You can read the thread at right here .
The latest exchange on the LNC is reported by Starchild to read:
> From: “Geoffrey Neale”
> Subject: Re: [Lnc-discuss] Alternative convention sites
> Reply-To: lnc-discuss@…
> Starchild – I really do not know why I even try answering your stupid,
> stupid, stupid emails. Maybe it’s because I’m stupid. I probably am just
> going to start deleting your messages without reading soon. I’ll just
> create an automatic delete rule from Starchild.
> You are not asking Mark or me to do this research for you, but you think we
> should direct one of the Convention committees to do this. Who the hell is
> this “we” you talk about? The LNC? Fine – bring it on – MAKE A F###ING
> MOTION! If the motion passes, the LNC will be issuing a directive, because
> the majority of the LNC would be in agreement with you. If it fails, we
> will not, because the majority of the LNC would not be in agreement with
> you. So why haven’t you just taken the remedy that our Bylaws allows?
> Personally, I think it’s because you know you will lose the vote – by a
> By the way – the earliest convention that this could apply for is 2018 which
> is FIVE YEARS AWAY!!!!! What a colossal waste of time.
> However, if your motion passes, I predict that the Convention committees
> will either ignore the directive, defy the directive, or quit. Because what
> you are asking for is stupid.
> You claim that there are numerous members who would welcome alternative
> venues, yet I hear none of them volunteering to help you put together a
> coherent proposal. Perhaps your cohorts are as unskilled as you are.
> Perhaps they are just as lazy as you are.
> Why don’t you get off your ass and do the work yourself?