Darrell Castle On Marriage and the State

Darrell Castle talks about the Supreme Court case of the U.S. v. Windsor in which the Supreme Court overturned the Defense of Marriage Act and Proposition 8 in California. Castle was the Constitution Party’s 2008 vice-presidential candidate and is considering seeking the CP’s nomination for president in 2016.

8 thoughts on “Darrell Castle On Marriage and the State

  1. Reuven

    I’m not surprised Castle immediately went into religion in his response.

    Rather disappointed in him personally, for rejecting all of modern science and instead accepting Adam and Chavah as the first human beings, ex nihilo.

  2. From Der Sidelines

    CPer’s do that, which is why they are politically as irrational as the major party statists, even if their non-religious views are closer to freedom than the major parties.

  3. Nick Hensley

    They need to change their name from the Constitution Party to the Bible Party. They only believe in one text, and it isn’t the Constitution.

  4. Nick Hensley

    @4 agreed

    “Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven” – King James Version of Luke 6:37

    The Constitution Party (And far right element of the Republican Party) is nothing more then a giant ball of judgment.

  5. paulie

    God made Adam and Eve..and Steve and Bob and Carol and Ted and Alice.

    Let God do God’s job and focus man’s laws on real crimes with real victims. IE those who are complaining or left unable to complain.

    Consensual acts between those able to give informed consent should never be against man’s law.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *