Join IPR Team

Comment if you are interested in posting articles here at IPR by or about alternative (“third”) parties and independent candidates. Our rules do not allow for publishing your own editorials, but you can save them as a draft and we usually have no problem finding other team members to publish them. Writing at IPR is a 100% volunteer activity, and you can post as often or rarely as you wish. If you posted articles at IPR in the past and haven’t in a long time, chances are you are probably still signed up; just ask, or feel free and encouraged to log in and post new articles no matter how long it has been. If you never signed up before and would like to give it a try let us know.

44 thoughts on “Join IPR Team

  1. paulie Post author

    Here’s what I found. I think there was a more recent revision but I’m not finding it.

    I’ll go over the basic ones I can remember, and I’m copying the group because there’s a decent chance there is something I forgot.

    1. Post as often or rarely as you want. There is no pay.

    2. All posts should have some relevance to alt (“third”) parties and/or independent candidates. If that relevance is not obvious, it should be explained with a blurb.

    3. We can post articles by or about people who have been associated with alt parties in the past but are now better known for their activities with establishment parties (e.g. Sanders, Trump – ran for Reform Party nomination in 2000, Ron Paul, Pat Buchanan), but should do so rarely and probably add a blurb reminding non-regular readers about the connection. Such articles should be posted *rarely* as otherwise it would be easy to overwhelm the site with them.

    4. Articles about alt parties in foreign countries are OK every once in a while, but again, only rarely. It’s not always immediately obvious what is or is not an alt party in foreign electoral systems.

    5. You can post editorials by other people with an alt party connection of some sort (it should be explained if they are not well known). You should either get their permission or post an excerpt and link back to the original. Same goes for news stories posted elsewhere. There are some sites which have given us blanket permission to post any of their articles in full so you don’t have to ask each time.

    6. Good sources for articles can include suggestions posted to the email list (I’ll send you an invite), suggestions in open thread, going through our links and seeing what they’ve posted lately, and google news. Anything that crosses your inbox that related to alt parties, etc. You can go thru old posts and find potential sources/ideas for future articles, etc.

    7. There’s a policy not to post your own editorials but if you save them as a draft and ask others on the list to post them they probably will. You can post news posted about yourself elsewhere, press releases that mention or quote you, and interviews by or about you with someone else.

    8. Don’t erase past articles, especially if they get comments. Mark them private so only IPR writers can see them if they cause a problem.

    9. Don’t erase old comments either, as they are part of the historical record and may make subsequent conversations seem disjointed.

    10. If you are not sure whether an article you are thinking of posting is in the guidelines or not, write the email list and ask. It can be used to discuss, and sometimes change, other site policies as well.

    11. Don’t add categories. You can add tags all you want.

    12. If an article has a category or several (it can have several), it should not also be uncategorized.

    13. Articles should almost never be uncategorized; as pretty much anything we post should fit in one or more of the existing categories.

    14. “Third parties, general” is not the same thing as non-left/right parties. It means articles whose subject matter applies to all third parties regardless of their ideology. This is one that a lot of people seem to get wrong 🙂

    15. Liberty/Free Market Parties are parties with an ideology roughly similar to the Libertarian Party but ***which are not the Libertarian Party***. Since that party already has a separate category, an article about the LP should not be marked as Liberty Parties unless it also pertains to some other liberty-leaning party besides the LP.

    16. Similarly, articles about the Constitution Party should not be marked right wing minor parties unless they also pertain to an additional right wing party or parties, and articles about the Greens should not be marked left/socialist unless they also pertain to additional leftist parties besides the Greens.

    17. There are some alt parties named Independent or Independence. That is not the same things as the independent category on IPR, which is only for candidates who run without a party. That’s another one I see people get wrong fairly often. Generally, most parties named Independent are non left right, but sometimes they are left or right. It’s usually pretty easy to tell which by a cursory look at their articles, platform, candidates etc.

    18. If commenters wish to be anonymous or pseudonymous, respect their right to do so and don’t share that information. An exception can be made for malicious trolls.

    19. Try to look through past articles and not post the same things someone else already did if you can help it.

    20. Have fun, pace yourself and take breaks.

    21. You made it! You can now drink legally. Don’t let the power go to your head.

    That’s probably more rules than we’ve discussed in a few years so maybe some of those will be revised if the email list has some discussion….but most of our rules are informal and you can find them through some trial and error and discussion on the email list and in site comments.

  2. Fernando Mercado

    Two more minor questions:
    1. Aside from those aforementioned rules, do writers pretty much have free rein?
    2. If articles had issues, would they or would they not be edited without the authors consent?

  3. paulie Post author

    Generally we only edit for style, not substance. But keep in mind you should not be posting your own editorials anyway. At least to begin with, since we don’t know you, you can save your articles as drafts and we’ll see if there are any big problems before they go live. If everything is smooth that restriction can be lifted.

  4. paulie Post author

    You said something about having problems with some site you wrote for before. What were the problems, and if you don’t mind me asking what was the site?

  5. Fernando Mercado

    I guess I see what you mean, I’ll probably save it as a draft first because I usually write in a first person perspective like an editorial, even if it’s not technically one

  6. Fernando Mercado

    First of all, I didn’t know I’d be supplied with an account so I tried to create my own, whoops!!! I’ll fix that before I start posting stuff

  7. Fernando Mercado

    Well the site was called RealProgressives, the experience was overall good aside from one thing, which is a long story that probably shouldn’t be said on a public forum.

  8. paulie Post author

    I’d love to write for the site!

    Thank you, I added you and sent you an invite. Draft articles only to start with since we don’t already know you, but that restriction can be lifted after some time.

  9. paulie Post author

    One more question, Are the pictures that go on articles put in during the writing process or after?

    I see you have a draft ready. If you know how to add the pictures yourself and want to do one that’s the best way to do it. If not let me know and I’ll pick out something generic to Green Party and approve it.

  10. paulie Post author

    There are add media and img boxes in the dialog it gives me to create a post. Do you have anywhere else to post it first and link to from here? If neither of those works for you email it to me. My contact info is in the About IPR tab.

  11. paulie Post author

    Forrest: Signed you up to submit drafts. I think there’s about a 50-50 chance you are actually Nathan or one of the other banned trolls, so I’ll be careful and tell others to be on alert, but we’ll give it a shot.

    Someone else who I am pretty much 100% sure is Nathan tried also, that one is a no.

  12. paulie Post author

    Fernando: I looked into it and it it looks like at your current wordpress level of contributor you can’t upload images to the IPR dashboard. So the best thing to be to upload them somewhere else like your weebly site or wherever and link them from there. The only other thing I can suggest is email them to me. Anyone else here know a lot about wordpress and have another suggestion?

  13. William T. Forrest

    I don’t have anywhere to upload images so in my case just add them after. Thanks bubba. And no I’m not Nathan, I don’t like him any more than I like you. You should probably sign him up too though since you are failing to get the job done on your own. Just my 2 cents. Also, while we are at it, why not go stick your head in an oven? Everyone will be happier, and even you will be less miserable. Kisses!

  14. paulie Post author

    Also, while we are at it, why not go stick your head in an oven?

    I may consider thinking about it if and when you provide a demonstration by doing it yourself.

  15. Fernando Mercado

    I was wondering why I couldn’t find what you were talking about, I’m not sure how I’ll put the image in at the moment. Aside from that image, a title, and it probably being too long, it’s pretty much complete.

  16. paulie Post author

    Looked done to me so I approved it. You should still be able to edit it after publication if you want to. Not saying you should, just that it is an option as far as I know (although I’d have to check if contributor level can, but I think so).

  17. James Clifton

    How do I submit articles? The American Free Soil Party just had its National Convention and nominated Adam Seaman of Massachusetts for President and Dr. Enrique Ramos for Vice-President. Also, I qualified to run as an American Free Soil Party candidate for Town Council in Millersburg, IN. Thanks.

  18. paulie Post author

    I can sign you up to post them yourself. Doesn’t do any good to submit anything unless there’s someone available to post it. I am sometimes and sometimes I’m not. I have people submitting stuff all the time and I forward a lot of it to the email list of the people signed up to post articles and most of the time no one wants to post anything. That’s why I am trying to sign up more people to post here. I’m sending an invite to your email.

  19. paulie Post author

    You’re already signed up. If you can’t find your password click that link under the name and password in the login box.

  20. Pingback: Thread for liveblogging – Libertarian Party of Alabama (and more states?) convention(s) this weekend | Independent Political Report

  21. paulie Post author

    I’ll set that up tonight or tomorrow. Just got back from a weekend trip so I had not got to it yet.

  22. Melinda Pillsbury-Foster

    We are launching DebateTourney.com this week. Here is a letter to some of our supporters. I would like to get an article on the Independent as this relates to all political parties and to the role of voters in elections.

    Today, over 400 Americans have announced their candidacies. You would never even learn their names or judge if they would be the best person for the job except for 2-Way Audience Participation. What we think we know is limited to what the Main Stream Media wants us to believe. Now, we can solve that problem starting with DebateTourney.com.
    DebateTourney will be like no debate you have ever experienced. The audience, connected by Smart TV, Smart Phones, through all platforms and devices, streaming, satellite TV, and cable, decides what questions they want answered.
    Today, a national dialog is possible because the matured technologies are now available. Learn about our courageous tech companies associates below. They have signed on to provide the tech interface to give you the power of asking questions, getting answers, making comments, uploading files and videos, donating, crowdfunding solutions yourselves, and buying tee-shirts and making suggestions. The audience also decides what the topics will be at the beginning of each 1 to 1 presidential candidate debate. A list of issues, including those provided by the audience, is on the screen. The audience votes on the nominated topics and so sets the agenda. In other words, the people can focus on their real concerns.
    We tried to give Americans this kind of choice in 1992. The interactive technologies were primitive then; but powerful enough to change the outcome of that year’s election.
    In 1992, PhoneVoter TV Network founder Brock d’Avignon, offered Bill Clinton a Road Show format, the last satellite uplink truck to follow their bus, satellite time to reach 10-Million people a day, and three ways for the audience to PhoneVote on Bill’s chats with people in diners, with those 10-Million people per day watching.
    Cast your mind back to January 1992. Bill and Hillary deflected the first accusation of sexually predatory behavior by Bill with Hillary’s Oscar-worthy performance on TV. Rejecting the Interactivity with voters, desperate candidate Bill Clinton overcame the two problems which he knew would stop his election. The two understood this was likely their only shot at the White House because of his sexual crimes, so they stepped up what had been a trial balloon campaign to the Full Monty. Building name recognition, and evading interaction with voters was essential. They were sunk if Bill could not edit his carefully fictionalized feel-good message. They sent only his ‘greatest hits’ from the road to news directors, after editing.
    At 89% popularity, President George H.W. Bush was oblivious to any thought of losing. Filled with smug pride, his campaign rejected 13 times Brock’s offer to place a satellite uplink on a flatcar next to their caboose during his whistle-stop campaign tour, going from Railroad Stop to Railroad Stop across America. Bush greeted only 10 voters a day. In 2000, H.W. made sure his son, W, had the uplink on the flatcar behind the caboose. In cahoots with the Democrats, BushCo, now including Dick Cheney, made sure, as they had in 1996 and then in 2000, no other Republican candidate could use satellite TV – or PhoneVoter Interactivity. The DNC and RNC self-commissioned Commission for Presidential Debates as was one of the reactions to PhoneVoter’s proposed debate and audience interaction. That control and manipulation has only tightened. Now we can end it in 2019.
    In 1992, PhoneVoter was designed so voters could ask questions and get answers. Voters reacted powerfully when they could interact with candidates who were not afraid of a dialog with the audience. This is what the Clintons most needed to avoid. Brock had three honest clients; Ross Perot, Jerry Brown and Pat Buchanan; all 60 other candidates had been invited to Interactive debates. Jerry would have won if he had started with PhoneVoter a week earlier with the AGREE-DISAGREE, PhoneVoter Unedited Presidential Candidate Speeches. As it was, Brown’s PhoneVoter campaign ran from late April to the Primary in California, six weeks, rising 2% in the polls a day. Brown was closing in on Clinton. Read the story on PhoneVoter
    Neither Bill, Hillary nor Clinton Media Consultant, Frank Greer, knew anything about satellite TV. The use of satellites was just then on the verge of changing the economics and power of television. PhoneVoter’s deal with Keystone Satellite Communications was made to popularize the use of satellite transmission with AGREE – DISAGREE Tallies, Telepolls forwarded to Congress and Media, and a choice of a panelist with whom the viewer could support.
    Today, the GOP’s RNC has told possible Republican candidates who were thinking about running against Trump to forget it; they are not welcome. The RNC announced they were merging their field teams with the Trump campaign. This is a first in history this happened before the primaries; but the Debate Tourney can bash past this attempt to restrict our choices with DebateTourney airing on a new network, Freedom Interactive TV Networks Association, on the Take It To The People Channel.
    Of the more than 400 candidates running now 65% of them are Independents, Decline To State, No Party or BLANK. America has a new majority non-party. 25 candidates, including Bill Weld, are GOP running anyway. The Democratic Party is now like the GOP a minority operation in America, therefore, is being slightly more subtle. However, 125 registered Democrats have filed with the Federal Election Commission along with more than 20 Libertarians and three Greens and other unknown political parties. Letters to each of these candidates for participation will go out this week.
    But elections have proven they do not solve problems, and what we need today is solutions to save our nation from economic meltdown.
    There is no solution in the soundbites being emitted by candidates to any of these problems if we are locked into the soundbite deadend delivered by NBC and CNN beauty pageants. What we need is 2-Way TV Interaction during one on one debates which allow us to know and understand the candidates. Americans need to accept that no one will step forward to rescue us. We must do this ourselves, beginning with the election to the office of president. We face an urgent need for effective action.
    The US Dollar (Federal Reserve Note) is dropping in value like the proverbial lead balloon; retail stores are closing at an unprecedented rate; joblessness is rising as people lose their homes to foreclosure and their cars to repossession. Today, 62% of us face homelessness in 2 – 6 months.
    During the Debate Tourney you will see real alternatives to these problems. Candidates will show you if they can recognize these as, together, we examine these in detail with the TV air time we need to see how these work and decide for ourselves if we want government to own 95% of mortgages, 65% of medical care, 95% of tuition debt, 80% of re-employment services, 40% of farm tool and vehicle credit.
    We arrived at this juncture through Rigid Installment Payments (RIPs), which allow banks to steal equity when the borrower is a few payments behind, which necessarily happens on occasion even in good times. Rigid Insurance Premiums, unpaid, cause your health insurance to be cancelled just when you most need it. We all want health care for all people. How do we do that? One proposal is a higher percentage of income tax to support Medicare for All. Another proposal is a free market percentage of income charging method called Percentage As You Earn (%PAYE) Finance and Mutual Medical Finansurance covering pre-existing conditions, insurances, and preferred personal choices. Hillary was offered this plan in 1993, conveyed to her by William H. Donaldson, Chair of the New York Stock Exchange. He handed it to Vernon Jordan for delivery to Bill, who handed it to Hillary, who tossed it.
    Now, the audience can decide. What a concept!
    DebateTourney confronts candidates with the need to compare their solutions to solutions which keep us in our homes and allow us to control our own health care while having access for all of us. All of these issues need to be discussed in detail in open debate. This tests candidates’ ability to see those problems, and be part of solving them. We need a president who understands this, and has proven he or she will not make the problems worse. Americans need an election, not another competition for who gets to waste our shrinking resources, nor comparing how long their fingers are.
    DebateTourney provides proven, working solutions to the problems which often requires no action by government. But leadership is needed. The people can do it themselves; they know what they want and need. Debate Tourney is a tutorial showing you how to use Interactive Technologies, as well. We now have the technology needed for real democracy, and to forge real solutions, together.
    Our Crowdfunder is coming up but if you could send us a few bucks, it would be much appreciated. There is a paypal at DebateTourney.com

  23. paulie Post author

    This is not the open thread. I’ll give you 24 hours if you want to repost that in the open thread, and will delete off topic comments on this one. Please only comment on this one if you are asking to be signed up to post articles here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *