Tag Archives: SCOTUS

Darryl W. Perry: SCOTUS Ruling Doesn’t Go Far Enough

Darryl W. Perry is a writer whose articles are published in several publications, including the monthly newspaper The Sovereign.  He is a co-host on a radio show on Liberty Radio Network. He is the owner and managing editor of Free Press Publications (FPP.cc). Perry is a co-founder and co-chairman of the New Hampshire Liberty Party, a party created in September 2012 to promote secession of the state from the federal government and individual liberty.Read more ...

Party for Socialism and Liberation: Supreme Court: When are supervisors not supervisors?

purchase viagra australia how does prednisone affect your period ideas to write an essay airport branding case study order viagra cialis help homework online how to write a discursive essay can you buy viagra over the counter in mexico source url https://geneseelandlordassoc.org/category/thesis-english/44/ go here enter site soft tab cialis levitra 2b online 2b thesis acknowledgement sample pdf research articles science see url viagra online prescription free nolvadex reduce gyno viagra coffee thesis topic outline sample instanttabs watch hindi essay on independence day in hindi language no prescription for levothyroxine 88mcg source url here how to write an analytical essay enter site viagra after bypass surgery good custom essay writing service Supreme Court: When are supervisors not supervisors?

When they are racist/sexist and company wants to avoid liability

By Jeff Bigelow

JUNE 29, 2013

Defining when someone is a supervisor and when they are not may seem like a ridiculous word game when by “common sense” everyone knows what a supervisor is.

Read more ...

Dr. Laurie Roth: This is not about gay marriage but about banishing God from American life

The following was posted by Joshua Fauver on the Independent American & Constitutional Review on June 29, 2013.

The following was posted by Dr. Laurie Roth on June 26, 2013 on RenewAmerica Dr. Laurie Roth is a nationally-syndicated radio talk-show host. She ran for the Constitution Party’s presidential nomination in 2012 and came in last (fifth place), with 6 votes, or 1.49%.
Read more ...

Darrell Castle On Marriage and the State

Darrell Castle talks about the Supreme Court case of the U.S. v. Windsor in which the Supreme Court overturned the Defense of Marriage Act and Proposition 8 in California. Castle was the Constitution Party’s 2008 vice-presidential candidate and is considering seeking the CP’s nomination for president in 2016.

Read more ...

Alan Keyes: High Court on DOMA, Borderline Insane

The following was posted on the Independent American & Constitutional Review on June 28, 2013 by Joshua Fauver. Alan Keyes, a former cabinet official under the Ronald Reagan administration and several-time Republican candidate for office, including president, sought the Constitution Party’s presidential nomination in 2008, coming in second place to Chuck Baldwin, with 24.36% of the vote.Read more ...

Green Party Statement on Supreme Court Decision Regarding the Voting Rights Act

Green Party: Supreme Court decision gutting the Voting Rights Act proves the need for an Amendment guaranteeing the right to vote

GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES
http://www.gp.org

For Immediate Release: Thursday, June 27, 2013
This release is online at http://www.gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=627

Contacts:
Scott McLarty, Media Coordinator, 202-904-7614, mclarty@greens.org
Starlene Rankin, Media Coordinator, 916-995-3805, starlene@gp.org

Green Party’s 2013 Annual National Meeting in Iowa City, July 25-28:http://www.gp.org/meetings/Iowa2013 / Media Credentialing for the meeting:http://www.gp.org/committees/media/press.php

Green Shadow Cabinet: http://greenshadowcabinet.us

WASHINGTON, DC — The Green Party of the United States called the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Voting Rights Act (VRA), which gutted key provisions of the law, a serious blow to the right of every American to vote in elections.… Read more ...

Green Party praises Supreme Court’s rulings on same-sex marriage

GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES
http://www.gp.org

For Immediate Release: Thursday, June 27, 2013
This release is online at http://www.gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=628

Contacts:
Scott McLarty, Media Coordinator, 202-904-7614, mclarty@greens.org
Starlene Rankin, Media Coordinator, 916-995-3805, starlene@gp.org

Green Party praises Supreme Court’s rulings on same-sex marriage

• Green Party’s 2013 Annual National Meeting in Iowa City, July 25-28: http://www.gp.org/meetings/Iowa2013 / Media Credentialing for the meeting: http://www.gp.org/committees/media/press.php

• Green Shadow Cabinet: http://greenshadowcabinet.us

WASHINGTON, DC — The Green Party of the United States praised the Supreme Court’s decisions, announced on Wednesday, on same-sex marriage rights.… Read more ...

Constitution Party of Wisconsin Reaffirms Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage

6/27/2013

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 27, 2013
Contact: 877-201-2441

The Supreme Court has been wrong before

“Because a sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil.” Ecclesiastes 8:11

Milwaukee-The US Supreme Court was wrong in 1857-The Dred Scott Case. … Read more ...

Libertarian Party of Florida Statement On SCOTUS Decision On DOMA and Prop 8

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects DOMA and California’s Proposition 8

June 27, 2013

By Randy Taylor
Public Relations officer, Libertarian Party of Florida

On June 26, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court made a decision based on the liberty of individuals and the right of states to determine laws regarding same-sex marriage. In separate 5-4 votes, the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, was declared unconstitutional; and Proposition 8 from California was kicked back to the state as the Court determined that supporters of it did not have the right to appeal the decision that it was unconstitutional by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Read more ...

Joshua Fauver: An Analysis of the DOMA Decision

Joshua Fauver is the vice-chairman of the Clarion Call to Unite Committee (CCTUC), an organization that aims to unite all right-wing and constitutionalist third parties under a single banner. Fauver is also the Southeast Regional Coordinator for the Robby Wells 2016 independent presidential campaign.

An Analysis of the DOMA Decision 

by Joshua Fauver

June 27, 2013

Originally published on the Independent American & Constitutional Review

 

On Wednesday, June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court rocked the nation when they decided on a 5-4 vote that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA, which barred the federal government from recognizing same sex marriages) was unconstitutional.… Read more ...

Constitution Party Reaffirms Platform Plank On Family In Light Of SCOTUS Ruling On DOMA

The following was posted on the Constitution Party’s Facebook page yesterday:

CONSTITUTION PARTY PLATFORM: FAMILY
No civil government may legitimately authorize or define marriage or family relations, as affirmed by the 10th amendment, delegating to the people as our founders understood the family as necessary to the general welfare.

We affirm the importance of Biblical scripture in the founders’ intent as eloquently stated by Noah Webster: “The moral principles and precepts contained in the Scriptures ought to form the basis of all our civil constitution and laws… All the miseries and evils which men suffer from vice, crime, ambition, injustice, oppression, slavery, and war proceed from their despising or neglecting the precepts in the Bible.”

The law of our Creator defines marriage as the union between one man and one woman.… Read more ...

Libertarian Party of Indiana Statement on U.S. Supreme Court ruling on Defense of Marriage Act

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

June 26, 2013

(Indianapolis, Indiana)  The Libertarian Party of Indiana applauds today’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling striking down key provisions of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

LPIN State Chairman Dan Drexler issued the following statement:


“Today’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court is clearly an historic move toward marriage equality consistent with the long-held libertarian belief that government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships.… Read more ...