Green Party supports 9/11 Truth search for Answers

Excerpt of an OpEd News article, as posted by Ian Wilder at onthewilderside.com:

911Truth.org Statement To The Press
Sept 4, 2009

Numerous media outlets have contacted 911truth.org, asking us to “make sense” of Van Jones’ “strange” behavior. We have issued the following statement:

“As the eighth anniversary of 9/11 approaches, what doesn’t make sense to us is that media outlets choose to impugn the character of the signatories rather than carry out your responsibility as watchdogs to call attention to the as yet unanswered questions raised in the 2004 statement. Five years later, we challenge you to finally print those same unanswered questions and pursue their answers with the same vigor with which you pursue the signatories.”

Those who are demanding deeper inquiry now number in the hundreds of thousands, including a former member of the first Bush administration, a retired Air Force colonel, a European parliamentarian, families of the victims, highly respected authors, investigative journalists, peace and justice leaders, former Pentagon staff, and the National Green Party. [emphasis added]

Full article at OpEd News

19 thoughts on “Green Party supports 9/11 Truth search for Answers

  1. Jeremy Young

    It is not clear that the “National Green Party” actually did sign this. David Cobb and John Rensenbrink signed it, but neither of them has the authority to speak for the Green Party. To analogize, if David Nolan and Michael Badnarik signed a letter, they could not claim to sign it in the name of the Libertarian Party. That would require a majority vote of the Libertarian National Committee.

  2. Jeremy Young

    And McKinney signed it as well. Still, if Nolan, Badnarik, and Bob Barr all signed a letter, they could not claim to sign it in the name of the Libertarian Party.

  3. Andy

    “Still, if Nolan, Badnarik, and Bob Barr all signed a letter, they could not claim to sign it in the name of the Libertarian Party.”

    For the record, Badnarik did sign a petition calling for a real investigation into 9/11 and he has publicly stated that he does not believe the official government story about 9/11.

  4. Michael Cavlan

    Well well

    This is interesting, to say the least.

    Because when I ran for the US Senate as a Green 2006, I ran in part as a 9-11 Truther. I am a Registered Nurse who actually treated some of the victims of the Pentagon attack a week after 9-11. My specialty is Burn and trauma ICU. I also had been an official GP official in the Ohio Re-Count 2004.

    In Minnesota, the former Green scheduler and organizer Danene (former Greens For Nader Co-Chair) supported me strongly. She also is a 9-11 truther. In fact she had some lit asking questions of the 9-11 attacks at the GP minnesota Fair booth.

    Both Danene and I were smeared, pilloried and attacked for our wacky positions by

    David Strand and others. Bestest friends with David Cobb.

    Did I mention that David Cobb refused to publicly endorse my campaign for US Senate 2006?

    I still received 86% of the vote for endorsement in that race. With an organized block of “greens” who wanted no green to run anywhere, any time.

    What a murky world is GP politics. A fine wire balancing act of words, while ensuring no real solid opposition to the pro-war, corporate corrupted Democratic party.

  5. Melty

    trauma ICU stands for “I see you in trauma”

    I’m sorry, Michael, I’m just so bad at acronyms, but I’m fascinated . . . you were on-the-scene so to speak?
    Your murky GP world description intrigues me too . . . I know little about the Greens, but I’ve been getting this vague sense of the party missing teeth, so to speak. I would’ve thought they’d be more irked about war by now. The same goes for the LP times ten.

  6. Melty

    Too bad the lily-livered Libertarian Party’s too gutless to jump on this list. Badnarik signed a petition calling for a real investigation and said publicly he doesn’t believe the official story? Why aint de entire LP done as much? Ever since the commission report deal I been callin it lame. Why shy away from calling for an investigation? It aint too late.

  7. steve

    We have a significant % of this population that will continue to block their minds to the truth, mo m,atter how strong the evidence (nano thermite)

    We’ve had the Cole, ss Liberty, Op Northwood, Oklahoma, Op Gladio.. How many more state sponsored false flag attacks are required before our ‘free & brave’ citizens understand & acknowledge what’s going on? 9/11 is the key.

  8. Melty

    myself, I’m just skeptical all round, so I don’t know if I qualify as a “truther” or not

    I prefer to call it the “jumbo jet fiasco”

  9. paulie

    Badnarik signed a petition calling for a real investigation and said publicly he doesn’t believe the official story? Why aint de entire LP done as much? Ever since the commission report deal I been callin it lame. Why shy away from calling for an investigation? It aint too late.

    True true….

  10. Michael Cavlan

    Melty

    ICU Intensive Care Unit – In other words very fucked up by trauma and burns

    //:-)>——-

    yeah, the GP……. well…………

    One of the reasons I supported McKinney was her public position on 9-11. She, like I called for an independent Investigation.

    When I was still part of the campaign I remember the Wisconsin GP getting their panties into a twist because of “some 9-11 Truthers taking over our press conference” with Cynthia.

    I told them that 9-11 Truthers were WELCOME to the MN press conference.

    I still wonder if Cynthia herself knew about the shit these folks were pulling off.

  11. Michael Cavlan

    Melty,

    Sorry, forgot to address one of your points.

    Yes, as a Registered Nurse with burn care experience, the gub’ment approached my unit ( a Regional Level One Trauma certification) and asked if some of us would aid in the treatment of those massively burned in the attacks. Six of us went. I went in the first wave and treated some of the pentagon attack victims.

    Which I have always found ironic, given my political history.

    I became a member of the NDMS National Disaster Medical Systems (an arm of the few founded Dept of Homeland Security)

    I became an official questioner of the official fairy tale of 19 muslims, with box cutters beating the most sophisticated air defense in the world, a few months later.

    In fact when I ran for US Senate 2006, virtually the only press I received was at my press conference, where I questioned the 9-11 story, the Ohio Election Theft and the death of senator Paul Wellstone.

    My one and only press which was, obviously a smear piece.

    Oh and the “left” in Minnesota either smeared me or ignored me and my campaign. including that minority section of the GP that have wreaked the GP.

  12. Michael Cavlan

    The Tyranny of the Minority AKA the Committee To End Free Speech is, of course whom I speak of.

    Thanks for the opportunity to speak my truth here.

    Damn you IPR. Damn you for allowing free debate and discussion. Where are the censors when you got folks speak truth to power?

    //:-D>——–

  13. Andy

    “Melty // Sep 6, 2009 at 8:42 am

    Too bad the lily-livered Libertarian Party’s too gutless to jump on this list. Badnarik signed a petition calling for a real investigation and said publicly he doesn’t believe the official story? Why aint de entire LP done as much? Ever since the commission report deal I been callin it lame. Why shy away from calling for an investigation? It aint too late.”

    That’s because there are too many cowards and naive people in the Libertarian Party. It is shameful.

  14. Dave Schwab

    The Green Party has consistently supported calls for a new, independent investigation into the events of 9/11/01. Here are a few press releases from the Greens:

    5/19/02: Greens demand an investigation into Bush’s prior knowledge of the September 11 attacks
    http://gp.org/press/pr_05_19_02.html

    4/28/04: Greens call 9/11 commission deeply flawed, call for an independent probe led by surviving family members
    http://gp.org/press/pr_04_28_04.html

    7/29/04: Greens cite reasons for a new, independent 9/11 probe
    http://gp.org/press/pr_07_29_04b.html

    9/11/06: On 5th anniversary of 9/11, Greens call for a new probe of unanswered questions
    http://gp.org/press/pr_2006_09_11.shtml

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *