Press "Enter" to skip to content

NC-Senate: Libertarian Beitler Excluded from Debates on a Technicality, NCAB Evolves Rationale for Decision in Favor of Exclusion

From Poli-Tea:

According to a report at UNC’s Daily Tarheel, Libertarian candidate for US Senate, Michael Beitler, will not be invited to a number of October debates being organized by the N.C. Association of Broadcasters and the Educational Foundation, despite the fact that Beitler successfully petitioned his way onto the state’s ballot by obtaining 100,000 signatures in support of his effort. In a campaign press release published at Independent Political Report, Beitler responded to the snub, arguing that such exclusionary tactics on the part of the media deny voters the ability to make an informed choice when casting their ballots:

“If you are on the ballot, you should be included in the debate. By excluding qualified candidates, the media is denying voters the ability to make an informed choice. We encourage voters to get informed and get out the vote,” said Beitler.

The official reason why the media organization has excluded Beitler from the forums is a familiar one. The group’s president, Tim Morrisey, says Beitler simply hasn’t demonstrated enough support in any polls to warrant his inclusion in the debates. As reported at WRAL:

North Carolina Association of Broadcasters President Tim Morrisey said Friday that Libertarian Michael Beitler had not been invited to the Oct. 11 and Oct. 21 debates because surveys fail to show him with at least 10 percent support. Morrisey said the threshold has been used before. [Emphasis added.]

Perceptive observers of this race will note that Beitler has indeed demonstrated 10% support in at least one poll. Following the first debate of the season, which was held earlier in the summer and included the Libertarian candidate, Beitler received a noticeable bump in the polls, garnering 10% support in a survey by Public Policy Polling. At the time, I wrote that this might ensure his inclusion in future debates:

the results of this poll may well ensure that Beitler is included in future debates, as 10% support in a “neutral” poll is one criterion of inclusion in such forums for many media outlets.

I probably should have known better. Even though surveys do not fail to show him with 10% support, Beitler is still being excluded from the forums organized by the N.C. Association of Broadcasters. I contacted the N.C. Association of Broadcasters to inquire about this obvious contradiction, and was told that candidates must show an average of 10% support across any number of surveys in order to be included in the forum. As Beitler’s support has generally hovered around 6-7%, and not broken through the 10% mark, the apparent ex post facto technicality ensures his exclusion from the NCAB forums. Beitler will, however, be included in an October 13th debate organized by the League of Women Voters, who are clearly interested in helping to ensure that the people of North Carolina make an informed decision when they cast their votes for US Senate.

5 Comments

  1. Michael H. Wilson September 16, 2010

    Someone might wish to point out in a press release that one of the reasons people distrust the press is because of things just like this.

    I guess there is a difference between reporting the news and making the news up.

  2. AroundtheblockAFT September 15, 2010

    1) talk to the Democratic candidate and see if he/she will make note in opening remarks that it is a shame the Libertarian candidate was not included (and tie the exclusion to the GOP if possible).
    2) every LPers in NC show up at the debate and demonstrate against the exclusion. That will probably get more media coverage than the usual sparse quotes they provide when an LP candidate is included!

  3. d.eris September 14, 2010

    Thanks for the correction on that point Richard. I was unsure about it myself, and so relied on the report from the Tarheel.

  4. Richard Winger September 14, 2010

    This is a good post, but it is not accurate to say that Beitler submitted 100,000 signatures. He didn’t submit any petition. Neither did the Libertarian Party, this year. The Libertarian Party is on the ballot automatically in 2010 because it got over 2% for Governor in 2008. It is true that the party petitioned in 2008, when the requirement was 69,734.

  5. Steven wilson September 14, 2010

    The league of women voters is the only safe haven anywhere I have seen. If the elephant has any pull at all, no libertarian will see the light of day. It doesn’t matter why. The two parties must facilitate the illusion of freedom, not the reality.

Comments are closed.