Freedom Socialist Party: Imagine … revolution! Lennon’s political legacy

Subscribe and donate!

Support the cutting-edge newspaper that provides the best in news, analysis, and humor from a working-class perspective. This corporate-free zone needs your backing!

Check out for more stories. Like us on Facebook or donate to keep the presses running and stories coming.

April-May 2013 – Volume 34, No. 2


Imagine … revolution! Lennon’s political legacy

Dave Schmauch
April 2013

John Lennon, circa 1971

John Lennon, circa 1971

Volumes have been written about the life and music of John Lennon. The least appreciated aspect is that his desire to make the world a better place was deeply political, and in turbulent times much like today.

As Marx might have put it, through his music Lennon carried out a battle “now hidden, now open” against injustice as he perceived it during his lifetime. Some of the best known Beatles-era songs were obviously couched in drug-induced metaphors of the ’60s. Others, mostly later in Lennon’s career, identified unambiguously with working class struggle, specific political causes and revolutionary change.

Music and politics reacting. Lennon was primarily drawn to the sound and lyrics of the Black American rock and roll musicians who eschewed religious material and instead sang directly and simply about life and living. The songs of musicians like Chuck Berry and Little Richard resonated especially with his own understanding of the world and how it works.

Although many different influences contributed to his music, Lennon’s overall output embodies a healthy dislike of organized religion, a hatred of capitalism and war, an internationalist perspective, a distinct class-consciousness, and a firm belief that ordinary people can change the world.

Right-wingers of course decried such apostasy. In 1966 he was targeted by evangelists for having remarked that the Beatles were “more popular than Jesus now.” Radio stations in the U.S. South boycotted Beatles music, and actually sponsored public bonfires of their records. Check out YouTube for a record-burning in Birmingham, Alabama.

During early Beatles tours to the U.S., Lennon defied manager Brian Epstein’s admonition to say nothing against the Vietnam War, and spoke up. In 1969, he and his partner Yoko Ono staged a “Bed-In for Peace” at a hotel in Amsterdam. Questioned about the consequences a famous musician might face for speaking out against the war, he answered, “If we’re going to be hounded we may as well say what we have to say about peace and things.”

Naturally, the FBI spied on him and eventually accumulated a 300-page file. Not until 2006 was the Bureau forced to release those files. Recently, the Russian female punk-rock collective called Pussy Riot sang a song criticizing President Vladimir Putin, using a Moscow Cathedral as the stage. For their inventiveness, three of them were sentenced to two years in prison, and the persecution continues. In the U.S. today, dissidents confront not only the FBI, but also Homeland Security and secret spies galore.

Getting more radical. Lennon’s music and activities changed following the breakup of the Beatles in 1970. In an extraordinary interview from 1971, which appeared in a small British Trotskyist publication called “The Red Mole” and was just recently published in “La Pluma,” a Mexican Trotskyist journal, Lennon describes the stifling effect of the music industry captains. By the time of the breakup he almost certainly wanted to get out from under the apparatus which controlled his artistry and politics.

In 1972, Nixon was campaigning for reelection. Lennon’s song “All we are saying is give peace a chance” had become the anti-war anthem for millions of young people. Tricky Dick was keenly aware of the impact Lennon was having, turning youth against the war.

In an attempt to head off the pop artist’s potential support for the Democratic Party challenger George McGovern, the U.S. initiated deportation proceedings. In the end Lennon decided not to actively campaign for McGovern or participate in any protest at the Republican National Convention.

Still, his music became more political. Take some of his songs from the 1972 album entitled “Some Time in New York City: “Angela” buoys the mobilization to free political prisoner Angela Davis; “Attica” denounces police brutality; “John Sinclair” pleas for the release of an American poet and supporter of the Black Panthers; “Sunday Bloody Sunday” explicitly condemns the murders of unarmed civil rights protesters in Northern Ireland and calls for the British to get out.

Lennon’s creative output in the last eight years of his life was uneven and decidedly less political. Significantly, during this period, he was often separated from his partner and political muse Yoko Ono who has sustained her political activism to this day.

Ultimately Lennon dropped the political torch for others to pick up. Fortunately there will always be people with courage to carry it on, among them a great many artists.

Dave Schmauch is a musician and longtime activist with FSP in New York City. He can be contacted at

Click here to see the current Freedom Socialist. To subscribe to the FS by postal mail, email, or audio CD, visit here or send $10 for one year or $17 for two to Freedom Socialist, 5018 Rainier Ave. S., Seattle, WA 98118.

(Students $8 for one year, strikers and unemployed $5, overseas airmail $18.)

Please contribute to sustain our work. You can donate now via PayPal

To see the booklist at Red Letter Press or to find out more about the Freedom Socialist Party, go, or reply to this message. We would love to hear from you!

Friend on Facebook | Forward to a friend

Freedom Socialist Party
Keeping you up to date on the FSP.

Our mailing address is:

Freedom Socialist Party

4710 University Way NE, #100

Seattle, WA 98105

Add us to your address book

Telephone: 206-985-4621

8 thoughts on “Freedom Socialist Party: Imagine … revolution! Lennon’s political legacy

  1. Concerned Citizen

    What this article conveniently fails to mention is that Lennon rejected Socialism and turned to both libertarianism and Pat Robertson’s evangelism before his murder.

  2. Deran

    Pat Robertson does not “believe” in personal responsibility. Robertson believes the written Bible is the written word of God and is to be obeyed at all cost. Deregulation of cannabis is a good thing, but hardly seems the definitive question when assessing someone’s adherence to libertarian capitalist principles.

    I’m not to keen on The Beatles, John Lennon or the FSP, but attempting to make Lennon out to be a Reaganite based on publications and a “documentary” made by a Christianist propagandist is not a form of verifiable evidence. evidence of anything.

    Besides, what multisource evidence there is abt Lennon and Pat Robertson has to do with Lennon’s activity in 1977, not a few months before he was killed. By then Lennoon had returned to his interest in New Agey crap.

    And it is also worth noting that on Dec 8, 1990 Pat Robertson used his TV show to do a public critique of Lennon (on the anniversary of his murder), and a line by line “critique of the song Imagine.

  3. Catholic Trotskyist

    Also, Pat Robertson’s 1988 presidential campaign was not very economically libertarian either.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *