Press "Enter" to skip to content

Thoughts on test Libertarian Party site?

As per the request of Wes Benedict, can IPR readers give their thoughts on this site?

http://libertarian.nationbuilder.com

22 Comments

  1. JohnJeremyVines February 20, 2016

    Having compared the two sites, the test site is an improvement but that’s not saying much. Certainly not worth $20,000.
    As for the logo, yeah, that’s just awful.

  2. Dr. Bud Martin February 19, 2016

    Someone needs to read WordPress For Dummies. Apropos generally, for LNC. Who is the proposed beneficiary of the $20K? It’s a secret, correct? What the LNC does best is mis-spend, and never tell anyone.
    Shane rules … .

  3. Shane February 19, 2016

    Yeah, that’s bad. Very hard to read and the layout is not ideal. It’s definitely not designed for call-to-actions, which is what you want.

    In designing an organization’s site, you’re not looking for people to visit it each day and develop a habit (very hard to do). The goal is to get a new visitor to take an action. Keep it simple.

    You can still have all the content and “clutter” but have a very direct way for a person to get into the conversion funnel. Contrasting the CTA against the rest of the site with the use of color and space is the easiest way to do that.

    You don’t have to “close the sale” on the first visit, you have to get a visitor to open the door.

    Having a pretty or clean site is all fine and dandy but if it does not serve its purpose, don’t bother dedicating time or money to it. Just put up a billboard site and call it a day.

    With that said, LPHQ should just pull the trigger on a template to get off of their current CMS. They’re locked into a proprietary version of PHP (called Moon PHP) and making any structural changes are a major PITA.

    So good or not, switch it over, load the old content into the new database and start tweaking.

    And Robert, when you switch, take me off of the freaking admin notifications with Rackspace! It’s been nearly a decade of annoyance . . . and I know you’re reading. 😉

  4. NewFederalist February 19, 2016

    Hate to sound like a curmudgeon but I agree with Austin and Darcy.

  5. Darcy G Richardson February 19, 2016

    I agree with Austin. I think it looks horrible, just like the new banana logo.

  6. Jeff Davidson February 19, 2016

    I think it looks good overall, but there was a whole lot of yellow for my taste. For me, the white printing on a yellow background did not show up well at all.

  7. Matt Cholko February 19, 2016

    I think it looks good. I’ve viewed it in Chrome on my PC and Chrome on my Android phone. Both versions look solid.

    I agree with a comment above that it looks fairly “stock”. But, that’s fine. Its a big upgrade from the current site, and it can be polished later.

  8. Austin Cassidy February 19, 2016

    Major downgrade, just like the new logo. Part of a totally confusing move to burn money and reduce the visual quality of the party’s communications… it all makes absolutely no sense to me.

  9. Shivany Lane February 19, 2016

    I think it looks nice and clean, yellow is always a bold choice 🙂 It is used tastefully on this site though.

    our Cyber Party had a test website I started to build out on Nation Builder. It’s a good choice since they probably are robust enough to keep the site safe and running.

    As mentioned if it has issues on smaller screens (tablet and smartphone) maybe just some style tweaks will get it to behave better. Life used to be simpler for us web designers when everyone had pretty much the same size screen and only 2 basic browsers. Oops, am I dating myself now? It used to be that bigger and more was better, I have 2 monitors. Most users use their smart phones these days.

  10. Ty Aldrich February 19, 2016

    It was an effort to finnd wherre to make a comment!
    That said, itt is a great idea, calling thee site “Independent Political Report. A lot of people are cal;ling themselves independents, these days.. Also, a good many independents will find out they are more libertarian than they thought.

  11. Jeremy February 18, 2016

    Disclaimer: not a Libertarian.

    It is a vast improvement over the old site, which is horrifyingly outdated. However, to those in the know, it is clearly a fairly standard WordPress site, which is a bit low-budget for an organization with the LP’s financial resources. I wouldn’t pay that dude $20,000 to upgrade it, but I would pay a developer a couple thousand to add the visual bells and whistles that would make it look more professional and sophisticated.

  12. Caryn Ann Harlos Post author | February 18, 2016

    Wes, I have posted this around FB as well and so far very positive reactions.

  13. Jill Pyeatt February 18, 2016

    Didn’t we determine a while ago that we’re really close in age, Mark? I can barely type the numbers, but rumor has it that I was born in ’55, which makes me…really old.

    What’s Facebook? It’s a place where I spend way too much time, but where I’ve made wonderful liberty-lovers across the continent.

  14. Mark Axinn February 18, 2016

    Jill,

    I’m not as young as you are.

    What’s a facebook?

    Wes,

    Looking good!

  15. George Whitfield February 18, 2016

    Looks great!

  16. Brian February 18, 2016

    Massive, massive, massive, massive improvement. Challenge will be to keep it clean going forward. Even the best designed site can look clunky and cluttered if updated carelessly.

  17. Jill Pyeatt February 18, 2016

    I like the site! I love that I can sign in through Facebook, and it’s easy to use.

  18. Caryn Ann Harlos Post author | February 18, 2016

    Wes, done.

  19. Kimberly February 18, 2016

    I like it. Clean and detailed.

  20. Wes February 18, 2016

    Can you link to the home page, instead of the register page? Thanks. libertarian.nationbuilder.com

  21. Caryn Ann Harlos Post author | February 18, 2016

    Commenting to subscribe

Comments are closed.