Press "Enter" to skip to content

Green Party Considers Special Fund to Identify Nonpartisan Local Candidates

The National Committee of the Green Party of the United States is considering a proposal to establish a special fund aimed at improving its ability to identify both registered Green Party candidates running in nonpartisan local elections and those already holding local office in states that track voter registration by party.

The proposal was introduced in early February by the party’s Steering Committee. It would establish the fund as a “Special Project” under the party’s Fiscal Policy, which would then be used to provide resources for state Green affiliates to track and recognize Green Party members who are either seeking or currently holding elected positions in nonpartisan races.

According to the proposal, 28 states and Washington, D.C., actively allow voter registration by political party. Among them, 22 states and D.C. specifically count Green Party registrations. However, in many of these areas, a majority of state parties lack the means to systematically identify Greens running for nonpartisan offices, leaving a significant portion of Green candidates and officeholders untracked.

“If this work was done in most of all of the voter registration-by-party states in which one can register Green and have it be counted, that also have non-partisan local elections, arguably even more registered Green candidates and officeholders would be identified,” the proposal argues. “Alternatively, the failure to do this work means the number of reported registered Green candidates and officeholders in nonpartisan races across the U.S. is likely significantly understated., and thereby the strength of the Green Party understated as well.”

The proposal notes that much of the current research identifying Green candidates in nonpartisan elections has been conducted by Elections Database Manager Mike Feinstein, with additional contributions from Maine Green Party co-chair Lyn Maravelli. However, these efforts are described as “extremely time-consuming,” and divert attention from other essential database management tasks. The proposal also argues that a more decentralized and structured approach would improve state parties’ awareness of Green candidates while also allowing them to learn more about specific local races in their states.

To that end, the proposal calls for a dedicated donation fund to support these efforts, with a standalone donation link featured on the Green Party’s website. The party notes that it won’t “compel any funding” from its annual budget. Additionally, it would include periodic fundraising emails targeting current and former Green officeholders. The Elections Database Manager position would also be expanded to oversee stipend administration for state parties choosing to engage in this work.

If approved, the Special Fund would remain active through 2029, with periodic performance evaluations determining any potential extensions. Discussion on the motion will continue until March 2, with voting scheduled for the following week. According to the Green Party’s National Committee vote tracker, the motion requires a two-thirds majority to reach a consensus.

2 Comments

  1. Jordan Willow Evans Post author | March 6, 2025

    Voting on this motion is currently underway (debate on the motion took place throughout February, with voting not going into effect until now). According to the vote tracker:

    “Votes Received So Far
    Yes 25
    No 6
    Abstain 3
    34 Total Votes Received from 23 States/Caucuses”

  2. Nuña February 15, 2025

    So if I’m reading this right, the Green Party is now so unpopular even among watermelons that nobody wants to be identified with them, thus necessitating this money laundering scheme with the nominal by-product of hunting down people to strap onto the bow of the party’s sinking ship against their will, while the rats flee with the money generated.

    Or is the take-away only supposed to be that the GP is too incompetent to keep tabs on its members – rather than that no candidate or elected official would voluntarily come forward and reveal they are members?

    “The proposal also argues that a more decentralized and structured approach […]”

    Let me stop you right there. How is wasting money on creating a central database of watermelons, supposed to be a more decentralized approach?

    “To that end, the proposal calls for a dedicated donation fund to support these efforts, with a standalone donation link featured on the Green Party’s website. The party notes that it won’t ‘compel any funding’ from its annual budget. Additionally, it would include periodic fundraising emails targeting current and former Green officeholders. The Elections Database Manager position would also be expanded to oversee stipend administration for state parties choosing to engage in this work.”

    And there we get to the real heart of the matter: Additional revenue and spending outside of the annual budget and its scrutiny. An excuse to send out even more spam grubbing for money. And setting up a nice little quango for the boys/girls…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

twelve − 4 =

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.