Press "Enter" to skip to content

Libertarian Party: Michael Cloud’s Invoice from May to December 2012

 

Michael Cloud

The financial transactions between Michael Cloud and Carla Howell have become the source of an audit discussion headed up by Aaron Starr and his audit committee. Here is some background .

Date: Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:17 AM

Subject: Michael Cloud’s Invoice for May-December 2012
To: Geoffrey Neale <[email protected]>, William Redpath <[email protected]>, Geoff Neale <[email protected]>, [email protected], Tim Hagan <[email protected]>, [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected],[email protected][email protected][email protected], Vicki Kirkland <[email protected]>, [email protected],[email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected], Jim Lark <[email protected]>, [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected], Paulie Cannoli <[email protected]>Hi Geoff,Attached is my invoice for my May to December 2012 Fundraising, Marketing,
Writing, and other services.$400,798 that I raised and brought in to the National Libertarian Party –
PLUS news releases, promo, and other creative services.See you in Dallas.Warmly,Michael Cloud

   Michael Cloud Invoice May-Dec 2012

Libertarian Party Fundraising Letters

Appeal

Drop Date

Description

Gross Revenue

1206 RE

07/02/12

Renewal Letter

 $    13,195.00

1207 HO

08/06/12

Don’t let this hold back..

 $    33,261.00

1209 HO

09/13/12

Urgent Libertarian Message

 $    19,684.00

1210 HO

10/04/12

If all americans knew

 $    16,646.00

1210-2 HO

10/30/12

Is this the ..Good News..?

 $    11,461.00

1211 HO

11/26/12

foot stompin, smil making..

 $    12,079.00

1212 HO

12/31/12

You gotta see this: can’t fail

 $    16,595.00

                 FUNDS RAISED

 $  122,921

 $    (7,000.00)

=

 $  115,921.00

Commission =

x

15%

  $1000/letter +

=

 $    17,388.00

   (Net-1000)*15%

 $     7,000.00

=

 $    24,388.00

 

Libertarian Party Fundraising Emails

Topic

Email Date

Revenue

Hope and Possibility for Liberty – A Christmas Message to You

17-Dec-12

$570

Was 2012 the best year ever for our Libertarian party candidates?

07-Dec-12

$365

A Whole Lotta Shakin Goin On

29-Nov-12

$16

Only 24 Hours Left for You to Help GOTV

05-Nov-12

$2,231

Last 4 Days ‘til Election

01-Nov-12

$1,730

Urgent Libertarian message- last 7 days election Day

29-Oct-12

$2,690

Breaking News LP Candidates + New Polls Reveal + What Rs Are Saying Privately

12-Oct-12

$5,159

Libertarian Party Fights Back Against NEW Republican Party Attacks

09-Oct-12

$1,695

Amazing impact of petition to include gov. GJ in debates

02-Oct-12

$8,530

The LP strikes back

28-Sep-12

$17,272

Ron Paul’s race is over – but his mission lives on! – Tom P’s Paul Fest list

25-Sep-12

$3,313

I’ve got to get this off my chest before I explode

07-Sep-12

$7,430

Republicans trying to knock GJ off ballot in PA

21-Aug-12

$7,973

Last call to get LP in on Tampa Ron Paul festivals. Need your help now! Half Michael/Half Carla

20-Jul-12

$3,305

Matching phone solicitation

$10,000

Follow up to BA Matching email of 6/25

27-Jun-12

$13,052

Ballot Access ALERT: Libertarian Votes On the Line

18-May-12

$11,157

                                               FUNDS RAISED

$96,488

10%

                                  COMMISSION

      $9,649

 

News Releases

Topic

Post Date

1,139,562 Votes for Gov. Gary Johnson. Record-Setting L…

07-N0v-12

$500

A Vote you’ll never regret

06-Nov-12

$500

Vote LP or Please don’t vote

05-Nov-12

$500

Why No True Libertarian Vote Romney

12-Oct-31

$500

An Open Letter to the Commission on Presidential Debates

01-Oct-12

$500

Gov. Johnson could cost Romney 5 states

13-Aug-12

$500

ObamaCare ruling

28-Jun-12

$500

Rand Paul Betrays His Father’s Principles Half Michael Half Carla

08-Jun-12

$250

$3,750.00

LP News Review & Editorial Services

Issues II, III, and IV – 3 issues @ $500 ea. = $1,500 

Miscellaneous Services and Charges

Item

Post Date

Editing for H1206 ARF – BA Alert

20-Jun-12

$250

Ron Paul Festival Flier/Email  Half Carla/Half Michael

15-Aug-12

         $250

   $500

 

LP National Convention Promos, Marketing, & Sales Emails

Topic

Post Date

Libertarian Party’s National Convention May 3-6 in Las Vegas

30-April-12

$750

Gold Packages sold out; 22 Silver Package left; More LP…

27-April-12

$750

Libertarian Party’s National Convention this May in Las Vegas

13-April-12

$750

How Many LP Candidates do You Want to Elect?

19-April-12

$750

Mark Hinkle, LP National Chair, 4 Reasons Why to Attend

29-Mar-12

$750

Ruth Bennett, Convention Chair, Invitation to Attend

21-Mar-12

$750

David Bergland Wants You to Come to the LP Convention

15-Mar-12

$750

“9 Reasons Why Libertarians Like You Are Going,,,”

8-Mar-12

$750

“Why Is This Year’s 40th Anniversary Libertarian National Convention Unlike Any Other In LP History?”

28-Feb-12

$750

Why Haven’t You Been Told These Things About the Libertarian National Convention this May 2-6?”

22-Feb-12

$750

“Why you? Why are you getting this first?” – Libertarian Party

14-Feb-12

$750

                                                                                   Total$8,250.00

Billed to the Libertarian Party

Zero – $0.00

       Generated  $170,846                                                                                                                in Paid Convention Packages

Fees and Charges for 2012

Fundraising Letters  RAISED $122,921

$24,388

Fundraised Emails   RAISED $107,363

    $9,649

LP News review & editorial services

$1,500

News Releases

$3,750

Misc.

$500

                                              Total

    $39,787

                                          Billed For

 

$38,800

 

 

                               +++++

Between February 14 and May 7, 2012    Michael Cloud generated over $170,514 in LP National Convention Revenue.

From May 8 to December 31, 2012, Michael Cloud Fundraised over $230,284 for the LP.

Total: $400,798 for the Libertarian Party.

54 Comments

  1. Mark Hilgenberg December 7, 2013

    I think everyone should have the opportunity to get a commission for raising money for the LP. Let the cream rise to the top.

  2. George Phillies December 7, 2013

    I have not seen an email proposing that Neale tried to persuade Starchild to silence himself.

  3. Wes Wagner December 6, 2013

    Paulie

    Strike two! 😉

  4. paulie December 6, 2013

    There is an F word for this type of conduct.

    …Fantastic?

  5. Wes Wagner December 6, 2013

    Yup that was Paulie’s link — and how Cloud discusses he had done work form May forward, yet his newest invoices have charges from before May…

    (facepalm)

    I stand by my first assessment:


    I think it is obvious to anyone who is looking at this that the most likely scenario is:

    Cloud did some work.
    Cloud wanted to be paid.
    Cloud made up a number of how much money he and Carla would afford to pay from the treasury at the moment.
    Now people are trying to create an alternate reality that matches it.

    There is an F word for this type of conduct.

  6. Jill Pyeatt Post author | December 6, 2013

    It was Starchild talking about how Geoff Neale even tried to get the lawyer to get Starchild to shut up, but he told us anyway? That Starr pointed out that Michael Could had said in May of 2012 in revealing any conflicts of interest with being on the LNC that he planned to do some work with the LP in the future, yet later on provided an invoice that he’d already started doing work before that?

    Anyway, I’ve gotta go to dinner. Alan is standing with with his keys. I’ll post it as an article if I can find it.

  7. Jill Pyeatt Post author | December 6, 2013

    I’m looking for the email with the info on it. If anyone has it, can you please email it to me? I’m leaving for a couple hours, but I think it should be posted, since this invoice has appeared.

  8. paulie December 6, 2013

    Which email are you talking about? You can at least post it as a comment, which would not keep it from being posted as an article later.

  9. Wes Wagner December 6, 2013

    I am very curious. Starchild’s emails are often very thoughtful.

  10. George Phillies December 6, 2013

    I imagine readers are preparing to die of curiosity. George

  11. Jill Pyeatt Post author | December 6, 2013

    Starchild sent out some amazing info that you will find particularly intering, George, if you haven’t seen the email. I think it needs to be posted here, possibly as its own article. Michael Clous had a reason to submit this “updated” invoice.

  12. paulie December 6, 2013

    Nothing in the post is from Neale. There is a very brief intro from Jill in italics, followed by an email from Cloud TO Neale and others.

  13. George Phillies December 6, 2013

    Thanks. I couldn’t tell if at some point Cloud stopped and Neale started again.

  14. paulie December 6, 2013

    The whole thing is a copy and paste of Michael Cloud’s email, so presumably he wrote it himself.

  15. George Phillies December 6, 2013

    On rereading this, who wrote the last five lines of the original post?

  16. George Phillies December 6, 2013

    Clarification: There are several payments. The payments to which I was referring were commissions. Others were flat fees.

  17. George Phillies December 6, 2013

    Paulie, I think you said it backwards. That payment is a commission. The number for the amount Cloud raised came from the LNC.

    The LNC credits Cloud with raising 100% of all convention revenues.

    We have a Treasurer. We have a CEO, the national Chair. These events happened on their watch.

  18. paulie December 6, 2013

    According to the information in the post above he is taking credit for 100% of all convention revenues, as far as anyone has been able to determine.

  19. LibertarianGirl December 6, 2013

    How does Michael Cloud get credited with Convention Fundraising? This number wouldn’t include any attendance revenue would it? If so It’s ridiculous that he get credit for raising that money, I mean come on guys

  20. paulie December 6, 2013

    LOL, YMMV.

    But I do think that claiming that 100% of the revenue was due to his efforts kind of strains credulity. At least some of the money would have come in with no letter at all, just a return contribution slip. How much? Hard to say.

    I can say that I would have gone to the convention without his promotion of it. But it is possible he convinced me to get an upgraded package. Or maybe I would have gotten that anyway as well.

  21. David Colborne December 6, 2013

    I’m less offended by Mr. Cloud getting paid to write fundraising letters and more offended by the fact anyone got paid to write those damned things. Seriously, most of them make me reconsider my membership in the LP more than anything.

  22. paulie December 6, 2013

    Buchman and Starchild at Phoenix airport … on the way to change planes to aborted LNC meeting

  23. Andy December 6, 2013

    Paul said: “Starchild objected.”

    OK, one person objected to your removal from the Ballot Access Committee. Thanks, Starchild.

    Where was everyone else on the LNC? Why was this travesty allowed to stand? Why didn’t anyone else point out the blatant hypocrisy and double standard here? Doesn’t it seem like a stupid move to remove the person with the most knowledge about ballot access from the Ballot Access Committee?

    It’s not like Paul was even really going to profit from being on the committee. He would have only been paid on signatures that he personally collected, and he was not advocating being paid anything outside of what are considered to be standard rates on petition drives (and the LP usually gets a good deal on ballot access compared to the amount of money that a lot of groups pay out, and I can back this statement up with plenty of verifiable evidence). He also was not advocating doing any work that does not need to be done anyway.

    It seems pretty stupid to me to knock the person with the most knowledge about ballot access who is on the LNC off of the LNC’s Ballot Access Committee, especially when there have been and currently are other people on the LNC who also do paid contracting work for the party.

  24. paulie December 6, 2013

    Unfortunately, from the tone of most LNC comments I believe the floor fee will pass. But we’ll see.

  25. Mark Vetanen December 6, 2013

    I hope the LNC will consider the financial hardship imposed now those board members who where already in transit or at the location when they canceled the meeting.

    I agree with Starchild that more documentation is needed about the activities of the LNC, and measure the results.

    I agree with Wes that the LNC can be replaced with an organization that will behave and perform as the members expect and that achieves or common goals.

    The ball is now in the LNC side of the court – all that can be done now is to see how they play this out.

  26. paulie December 6, 2013

    He did, but he was already in Phoenix to switch planes by then. He wasn’t the only one.

  27. Jill Pyeatt Post author | December 6, 2013

    Starchild, you did get the message that the meeting was postponed due to weather, right?

  28. Wes Wagner December 6, 2013

    I think there is one thing we should all keep in mind… the real assets of the Libertarian Party are not in the possession of the LNC Inc… they are in the people in all the various state and local affiliates and the ballot access (and local knowhow of how to obtain it), our candidates, etc.

    The actual national organization can be fairly easily replaced, to be quote honest, provided that its only one major function that it does that is important is replaced by some national organization/pac/group/etc. — obtaining ballot access in those difficult states and continuing the fight.

    Those of us in states, like say Oregon, who have full time ballot access and have it easy, benefit greatly from all 49 of the other states having ballot access … and we all have a vested interest in making that happen.

    That “need” is the one thing that holds many of us hostage to the ill behavior of the people in the LNC Inc … but it is not that difficult to replace if we all agree to accomplish this goal another way.

    We, the various state affiliates, do not need the LNC Inc … and I believe we are getting close to the point where the organization, and the costs of trying to reform it, has a cost that is much greater than the benefit of allowing it to continue.

    Is it time for the LNC Inc to go and another legal structure used to fulfill its purpose? Maybe not quite yet … but if we aren’t there we are close, and I am not seeing out of the current LNC board what I need to see to think we are turning it around.

  29. Starchild December 6, 2013

    Sitting here in the Phoenix airport reading… Good points Andy and George. Too bad we don’t keep better track of our convention details.

    I’ve advocated having a standard form to fill out immediately after each convention listing stuff like the breakdown of how much money was made (or lost), how many people attended, how many delegates, what the venue’s requirements were, who the speakers were, what they talked about, what they were paid or comped if anything, etc.

    Maintaining this kind of data on our website on an ongoing basis, easily searchable by year, would give convention planners, and LP members, some very useful benchmarks for planning or considering future conventions.

    It is a bit odd that we don’t have an LNC fundraising committee, isn’t it?

    Perhaps not having a committee allows some individuals to work on it without the oversight or accountability of a formal committee structure?

    Of course the committees that do exist often aren’t very transparent in their operations either. At least they all appear to be listed on one page on the website now, with their current members — but there is no contact information listed for those members, no descriptions of what the committees do, when/how they conduct meetings, etc.

  30. Wes Wagner December 6, 2013

    Don’t worry Nick … you can tell the campaign manager for the Johnson campaign to spike ballot access in a state just for political points in a absolutely pointless pissing match and not even get censured.

    Paulie might get promoted for this!

  31. Nicholas Sarwark December 6, 2013

    Did you know that we sacrifice and eat human infants during LNC executive sessions? True story. Oops, I hope I don’t get in trouble for telling you that!

    Great, now Paulie will be forced to resign for revealing the content of executive session.

  32. paulie December 6, 2013

    Hah, you fools think I’m exaggerating. My evil plan is working! BWAHAHAHAHA!

  33. Wes Wagner December 6, 2013

    paulie

    Please do not distract from all the evils that the LNC actually does do … we want to be sure they get credit for them.

  34. paulie December 6, 2013

    Did you know that we sacrifice and eat human infants during LNC executive sessions? True story. Oops, I hope I don’t get in trouble for telling you that!

  35. Jill Pyeatt Post author | December 6, 2013

    Matt, I appreciate the reality check, and I might ordinarily agree with you, but Carla Howell was being paid as our Executive Director, and Michael Cloud was hardly a volunteer if he accepted almost $39,000.

  36. Wes Wagner December 6, 2013

    Sorry Matt… when you become chairperson of a state that watched as the former LNC chair misappropriated $5000, and all but 5 members of the LNC voted lock step in support of him, to pay the your state’s general counsel for the republican party to do one sided legal research to initate an attempted coup to put a puppet GOP regime into power, I will believe you have more credibility to hold your opinion that they are good people.

    Until then I will regard you as naive political roadkill.

  37. Matt Cholko December 6, 2013

    Cloud and Howell may be guilty of improper record keeping. However, the implication that they were stealing from the LP seems highly unlikely to be correct.

    As to this idea that the LNC is made up of a bunch of “crooks and scoundrels”…… it’s so ridiculous that I don’t even know where to start. I don’t agree with lots of things that the LNC does. But, that doesn’t make the members bad people. The reality is, the LNC is made up of a bunch of VOLUNTEERS, that are trying to do what they think is right. What they’re doing may not always be the right thing. But, I see zero evidence that there is anyone on the LNC that is intentionally trying to screw things up, steal stuff, lead the party in a way that they believe is bad, or anything else of the sort.

    With that said, this is a political party, so some politics should be expected.

  38. paulie December 6, 2013

    Just about all the sitting members got thrown out

    Many of the region reps are the same as last term. And Mark Hinkle is back on the LNC in a different capacity. So only about half the committee is different than last term.

  39. Wes Wagner December 6, 2013

    LP Observer

    We have more crooks and scoundrels than we have seats at the table, so the delegates keep cycling through them hoping something will change.

    Does that remind you of anything?

  40. LP Observer December 6, 2013

    Well, the 2012 National Convention elected these people to the LNC. Just about all the sitting members got thrown out, except Bill Redpath and Wayne Root. So has anything changed?

  41. Jill Pyeatt Post author | December 6, 2013

    This is SOOO not okay with me! Starchild has shared a bit more of Aaron’s concerns, which I’ll post later today if no one gets to it first. Anything other than total transparency on this issue will not be acceptable!!! What the heck were Mr. Cloud and Carla thinking?? Or were they even thinking at all?

  42. paulie December 6, 2013

    There is an F word for this type of conduct

    Fabulous?

  43. Wes Wagner December 6, 2013

    I think it is obvious to anyone who is looking at this that the most likely scenario is:

    Cloud did some work.
    Cloud wanted to be paid.
    Cloud made up a number of how much money he and Carla would afford to pay from the treasury at the moment.
    Now people are trying to create an alternate reality that matches it.

    There is an F word for this type of conduct.

  44. paulie December 6, 2013

    Bruce was looking for a good accountant to do his complex tax return. He walked into a prospective accountant’s office and the accountant went over the services he could provide to Bruce. Before Bruce left, he wanted to test the accountants number skills so he said: “If you can tell me what 10,472 times 7 is without using a calculator, I will hire you today.” The accountant said: “I can make the number whatever you want it to be.”

    LOL

  45. paulie December 6, 2013

    FYI LNC meeting has now been officially rescheduled, same place, next weekend.

  46. Wes Wagner December 6, 2013

    Bruce was looking for a good accountant to do his complex tax return. He walked into a prospective accountant’s office and the accountant went over the services he could provide to Bruce. Before Bruce left, he wanted to test the accountants number skills so he said: “If you can tell me what 10,472 times 7 is without using a calculator, I will hire you today.” The accountant said: “I can make the number whatever you want it to be.”

  47. Mark Vetanen December 6, 2013

    George

    You are pointing out something that is scaring the hell out of me. If what you are saying is true, and I have all the reasons to believe you are telling me the truth, then there is a major con job being pulled on the LNC, or the entire LNC board is engaged in fraud.

    Either way, heads should roll.

  48. George Phillies December 6, 2013

    The LNC does not have a fundraising committee? Not that I do not know the answer?

  49. paulie December 6, 2013

    This talk of Michael Cloud being an LNC member and also working as a paid fundraising contractor for the LNC raises an interesting question, and that is why is it OK for him to be both an LNC member and a paid contractor for the party, but it was not OK for Paul to be on the LNC’s ballot access committee due to him sometimes working as a paid petition circulator for the party (at least this was the excuse given for him being removed from the Ballot Access Committee)?

    Well, he’s not on the fundraising committee…although if we had one, I would think he should be on it. The IT committee had actual or potential IT vendors on it, which did not seem to phase the LNC too much. And as Andy points out, Ms. Visek has been a ballot access vendor, although not nearly on the same scale as me. Also, I have done thousands of volunteer signatures myself as well, including in Illinois.

  50. paulie December 6, 2013

    Paul being removed from the Ballot Access Committee turned the Ballot Access Committee into a joke, and the fact that nobody objected to this or bothered to point out the blatant hypocrisy in regard to this is disgusting.

    Starchild objected.

  51. George Phillies December 6, 2013

    Readers will note that the “201[2] convention brought in $170,514” as its total income. See Liberty for America, libertyforamerica.com, November issue, typo in year corrected here.

    “$170,514” is exactly equal to the amount Mr Cloud raised.

    Mr Cloud is being credited with having brought in every single penny of income from the convention. That’s incredible!

  52. Andy December 6, 2013

    This talk of Michael Cloud being an LNC member and also working as a paid fundraising contractor for the LNC raises an interesting question, and that is why is it OK for him to be both an LNC member and a paid contractor for the party, but it was not OK for Paul to be on the LNC’s ballot access committee due to him sometimes working as a paid petition circulator for the party (at least this was the excuse given for him being removed from the Ballot Access Committee)?

    The Ballot Access Committee consisted of Paul, Bill Redpath, and Diana Visek, however, Paul was quickly removed from the Ballot Access Committee before he even really had a chance to do anything after Diana Visek made an objection to Paul being on the committee due to him sometimes working as a paid petitioning contractor for the party, even though Ms. Visek worked as paid petitioning contractor for the party in her home state of Illinois. Mr. Redpath made no comment either way about Paul being on the committee, at least not publically, but making no comment certainly did not work in Paul’s defense, nor did it do anything to point out the hypocrisy in the fact that the LNC has other board members – such as Mr. Cloud – who also work as paid contractors for the party.

    I guarantee everyone here that Paul knows more about ballot access than anyone on the LNC, including Bill Redpath. The only person in the Libertarian Party who knows as much about ballot access as Paul is myself. The Libertarian Party’s real ballot access experts are myself, Paul, and Richard Winger (Richard Winger knows the most about the law, and the court rulings in regard to ballot access).

    I find it to be rather disgusting that the most knowledgeable person about ballot access on the LNC was removed from the Ballot Access Committee on a flimsy pretext with no objection, especially since the reason given does not stand up to any intellectual scrutiny, and is in fact quite hypocritical given that the LNC has other members who also work as paid contractors for the party.

    Paul being removed from the Ballot Access Committee turned the Ballot Access Committee into a joke, and the fact that nobody objected to this or bothered to point out the blatant hypocrisy in regard to this is disgusting.

Comments are closed.