Press "Enter" to skip to content

It’s official: Jesse Ventura will not run

Jesse Ventura will not be an independent/Independence Party candidate for U.S. Senate in Minnesota.

He says the only way he’ll run is if God intervenes between now and the 5:00 P.M. filing deadline tomorrow.

42 Comments

  1. Mike Theodore July 15, 2008

    He doesn’t share much respect for religion in politics. No way he’d take a pastor.

  2. G.E. Post author | July 15, 2008

    There is no possible way Ventura would ever consider voting for Baldwin.

    That should have been very clear from last night.

  3. Nexus July 15, 2008

    It sounds like Milnes is on the upside of his bipolar swing.

  4. Ross Levin July 15, 2008

    I’m back for a few hours.

    Neocon? I’ve read a few of Franken’s books, and he is a man willing to speak truth to power. That, more than anything else, is why I like him so much. Sure, I don’t agree with him 100% of the time, or probably 75% of the time, but that’s no reason to hate him. And remember, I’m no libertarian.

  5. Mike Theodore July 15, 2008

    Just going on t.v. to announce you won’t run makes you an attention whore? Should he have just passed by the registration date for everyone to silently assume he’d not run?

  6. NewFederalist July 15, 2008

    Really nice, Jesse. Really nice. What an attention whore!

  7. Robert Milnes July 15, 2008

    Mike Theodore, “A running mate has to be compliant on the issues that the candidate supports.” That is so-20th century. TR might have won if he picked a progressive democrat running mate. If the p & vp agreed to disagree on many things in order to be as inclusive as possible, that would be fusion. That could WIN.

  8. Mike Theodore July 15, 2008

    I just don’t mind him over Coleman. But now I sense Coleman will win. It always seems to work that way.

  9. G.E. Post author | July 15, 2008

    You young lads don’t mind neocon Al?

    What exactly is good about him, other than his sense of humor?

    NOTHING.

  10. Mike Theodore July 15, 2008

    I don’t mind him. But I highly respect Ventura.

    ROSS! Your back from wherever you were.

  11. Ross Levin July 15, 2008

    I’m a bit glad. I really, really like Al Franken.

  12. Trent Hill July 14, 2008

    Austin,

    You’re getting called by the Washington Times and co.? Incredible.

  13. Mike Theodore July 14, 2008

    Because it can’t work. A running mate has to be compliant on the issues that the candidate supports.

  14. Robert Milnes July 14, 2008

    Mike, Nader=leftist vote + Ventura=Libertarian vote= progressive/libertarian plurality. Why don’t you see that?

  15. Robert Milnes July 14, 2008

    As opposed to the same old dem/rep crap. Mediocre caretakers at best.

  16. Robert Milnes July 14, 2008

    More specifically, the vast possibilities that could be within reach upon winning the presidency.

  17. Robert Milnes July 14, 2008

    I’ve made several suggestions for a progressive alliance ticket. I’ve said many times it doesn’t have to be me. But I would like a paid position as Special Advisor to what could very possibly be a winning ticket. My interest is winning.

  18. Robert Milnes July 14, 2008

    Mike, no. Nader is the quintessential leftist/progressive. Ventura is evidently a left-libertarian. Now, if one gets a sex change operation, a ticket made in heaven!

  19. Gene Trosper July 14, 2008

    Damn. I was hoping he’d run. However, I totally sympathize with his reasoning. The media and political enemies tear you apart limb from limb and you feel this need to hold your tongue and go against your better judgment to lash out. I went through that crap myself on a local level. It can be overwhelming at times. To survive, you have to get a really thick skin.

  20. Mike Theodore July 14, 2008

    Robert, it’s far out. It’s far out because it makes no sense. Your mind just wants to see two people that are supremely different, and putting them together. For no particular reason, mind you.

  21. Robert Milnes July 14, 2008

    But you see how that is too far out? It probably never occurred to EITHER of them.

  22. Mike Theodore July 14, 2008

    Robert, your killing me. Just killing me.

  23. Robert Milnes July 14, 2008

    Nader/Ventura could win. In my crazy progressive alliance opinion. Not the best ticket, but a possible winner.

  24. Mike Theodore July 14, 2008

    The Theodore Herald will quote you anytime.

  25. Austin Cassidy July 14, 2008

    Oh well, I had been called a few hours ago by the Washington Times to get a quote for their story in the event that he decided to run.

    But I guess that won’t be happening… :-/

  26. Mike Theodore July 14, 2008

    No, Robert. I’m just saying don’t start on the Progressive Alliance thing. I’m just not in the mood. I was addressing him filing anyway.

    He won’t. That would be an inssult to his family.

  27. Robert Milnes July 14, 2008

    Mike Theodore, if he filed tomorrow, that would be different than the Perot scenario. You threw me there.

  28. Robert Milnes July 14, 2008

    Mike Theodore, yes, but how does that relate to me?

  29. Robert Milnes July 14, 2008

    Anti-Corporate, agreed. It is a pet peeve of mine. It is all over the place; almost instinctive. There is only a choice between the dem & rep.

  30. Mike Theodore July 14, 2008

    Don’t start, Robert.

    Do you remember Perot dropping out and then coming out back before November? That killed his credibility a bit.

  31. Robert Milnes July 14, 2008

    Wikipedia: “Lacking a party base in the Minnesota House and Senate, Governor Ventura’s vetoes were often overridden.” This is exactly the reason the Progressive Alliance Strategy calls for vote coordination of Green and Libertarian downticket candidates. Ventura evidently identifies as a libertarian. He could very well be a left-libertarian, just like I believe Teddy Roosevelt was. & I believe I am. It is the most radical position as it is in the overlap area of left and right.

  32. Fred Church Ortiz July 14, 2008

    “However, if he files tomorrow, he will have gotten that much more publicity than he otherwise would have.”

    I’m with Trent & Milnes here.

  33. Anti-Corporate July 14, 2008

    I’m disappointed that he won’t run and challenge the two party system in Minnesota.

    But I’m even more disappointed that he keeps talking as though McCain and Obama are the only choices for president. I wish he would endorse/support a third party candidate

  34. Sean Scallon July 14, 2008

    What a tool. If I was Larry King I would have kicked him off my show at that instance screaming “Go jerk around someone else you fool! You don’t come on here to make a non-announcement.”

    Maybe he can find a job with Mr. McMahon. They’re perfect together.

  35. Robert Milnes July 14, 2008

    Trent Hill, he cited personal reasons involving his family and negative publicity. However, if he files tomorrow, he will have gotten that much more publicity than he otherwise would have. So, possible.

  36. MattSwartz July 14, 2008

    It’s not like Ventura would’ve wrenched the Senate apart. He was remarkable because of his interest in attention and his lack of a major party label.

    Maybe the LP guy will do better now.

  37. Mike Theodore July 14, 2008

    Trent, it’s dead. Get used to it. Dead.
    The future of our Senate and nation stays on it’s track.
    What the fuck.

  38. Trent Hill July 14, 2008

    GE,

    A steak dinner says he files for the office.

  39. Mike Theodore July 14, 2008

    You too? I’m speechless. I really am.

    My mom’s sitting here, she said I look like someones died.

  40. G.E. Post author | July 14, 2008

    I feel like I got kicked in the stomach.

Comments are closed.