Press "Enter" to skip to content

Darryl Perry: ‘Supreme Court to Decide Validity of Constitution’

Emailed to [email protected] by Boston Tea Party national chair Darryl Perry:

In a story that sounds like it may have come from The Onion just a few years ago, Breitbart is reporting

“the United State Supreme Court will soon issue a landmark decision (possibly by the end of the year) on the validity of the Constitution.” William M. Windsor has filed three separate Petitions for Writ of Mandamus with the Supreme Court; which forces the court to hear his case, as opposed to an appeal which the court can reject. He has asked the court:

1. Will the Supreme Court declare that the Constitution and its amendments may be voided by federal judges?
2. Should federal judges be stopped from committing illegal and corrupt acts to obstruct justice and inflict bias on litigants?
3. Will the Supreme Court be afraid to disclose the corruption in the federal courts?

Windsor says the federal court in Atlanta “operates like a Police State.” And if the Supreme Court “fails to act” the people need to know “there is not a shred of decency, honesty or Constitutional rights” in the courts and “we now live in a police state… Our laws are meaningless.”

It will be interesting to see how the Court rules on these questions. Obviously that the Court should answer: No, Yes, No. However, given the history of the Supreme Court since the late 1800’s I’m not going to hold my breath on the court giving the “right” answers.

But, what will happen if the court rules that judges in fact can “void” the Constitution and its amendments? Will the Declaration of Independence & Articles of Confederation also become “void” thus making the United States a British dependency? Will people finally begin to question the federal system that we’ve been taught to trust? After all, the PATRIOT Act virtually stripped most of the protections “guaranteed” by the Bill of Rights, yet most people have accepted it as part of “living in a post 9/11 world” where safety is more important than liberty. We still live in the freest country in the world, right? You are “free” to either have a radioactive naked body scan or an uncomfortable encounter with a federal employee that borders on molestation before boarding an airplane. You are “free” to drink milk, so long as it’s been pasteurized first. You are “free” to purchase any health insurance policy that complies to federal standards, but not across State lines; and if you choose not to purchase an acceptable policy you are “free” to either pay a fine or face jail time. You are “free” to use a fiat currency issued by a privately owned central bank with a government issued monopoly on the issuance of paper currency. You are “free” to pay taxes, if you fail to do so men with guns my come to your house. You are “free” to comply to the hundreds of thousands of pages of laws, regulations & codes issued by municipal, county, State & federal governments, government agencies & other bureaucracies. As Bill Hicks once said, “You are free to do as we tell you!”


In Peace, Freedom, Love & Liberty,
Darryl W. Perry
Chair Boston Tea Party National Committee
http://BostonTea.us

Owner/Managing Editor Free Patriot Press
http://FreePatriot-Press.com

2016 candidate for President of the United States of America
http://dwp2016.org


Darryl W. Perry is an Activist, Author, Poet & Statesman. Darryl writes a weekly article for the Mountaineer Jeffersonian and has appeared on various alternative media talking about his books, political career and goals. Darryl is the Chairman of the Boston Tea Party National Committee and Owner/Managing Editor of Free Patriot Press.

To schedule an interview with Darryl please send an email to [email protected] or call 205 863 0110 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              205 863 0110      end_of_the_skype_highlighting

7 Comments

  1. Ross Levin November 15, 2010

    @4, it depends. It looks like they just picked up his story, or he picked it up from the same place.

  2. Ross November 15, 2010

    Breitbart’s not much of a trustworthy source.

  3. Darryl W. Perry November 15, 2010

    You should be able to purchase raw milk if you want to, most people don’t know about the federal laws against it!

  4. P November 15, 2010

    Oh the tyranny of pasteurized milk!

    (N.B. I’m not trying to disregard the arguments of this article, I just thought pasteurized milk was a strange thing to pick on.)

Comments are closed.