How do we get there?
Step One — Quick fixes. Two years ago, the LNC was burning close to $100,000 a year on IT activity. New Path, which had IT professionals as candidates, demonstrated that the spending levels were way too high. We should change.
Second, the Watergate location is way too expensive. There are many far more suitable locations, well outside Washington, such as southern New Hampshire, San Francisco Bay area, or Colorado where the Party was founded.
Third, make enough progress on clearing the brush that we can convince members and former members to vote with their wallets.
Fourth, and most important, take that money discussed above, and point it at doing real politics, notably advertising.
Step Two — Do Real Politics. How?
Outreach and Advertising. Voter recognition.
Step Three — Raise and Spend Money Well. For some years, Massachusetts has had effective budget allocation schemes. They assure that when money comes in the door it is immediately assigned to the activities that we want done, not left in a pot for special interests. That scheme says that most money is not set aside for overhead and fundraising costs, as was the case in 2010.
Core to the Massachusetts plan are financial reports that include concrete dollar amounts and specific items on which they were spent. Those reports should correspond, as party bylaws re-quire, to the Federal Agency to which we make our financial reports — the FEC.
View money as something we must earn by achievement. Every new donor is a new person committed to the party.
Look carefully at actual dollar costs for items, and see that the things those items support are properly costed against them.
Second, prudent financial reserves — have money in the bank, so that when special opportunities appear we can exploit them. Also, there are always possibilities for disruptions. A reasonable insurance is six months’ net income as cash on hand.
The LNC’s most specific mission is coming up in 2014. The National Convention business meeting…set aside the money to pay for it.
Third, don’t waste money. Direct mail membership recruiting is the most important example. A decade ago, huge direct mail recruiting efforts directed almost exclusively to right-wing mailing lists almost drove our party into financial extinction.
Fourth, mobilize every libertarian as a libertarian volunteer. Some of us have money but not time, but far more have more time than money. Members should be viewed as potential activists, not just as wallets that walk.
Fifth, improve our marketing efforts. Republican religious extremists like Romney and Santorum are driving large segments of their traditional membership base out of their party. Those people are natural Libertarian recruits, but you won’t find them at tea party rallies and Sarah Palin appearances. You won’t find them through right wing hate radio, or listeners to Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and Michael Savage.
Sixth, restore the productivity of the LNC. That means shut-ting down parliamentary games. It means giving the LNC a subcommittee structure, so that when proposals come to the full committee they have already been vetted by people the LNC trusts. Look at the old LNC. A typical 1991 meeting had reports from
Executive Committee
Headquarters
Membership Committee
Affiliate Parties Committee.
Affiliate Campaigns Subcommittee
Audit
Management Committee
Outreach Committee
Convention Oversight Committee
Advertising/Publications Review Committee
Convention Committee
Appointments Bylaws and Rules Committee
Media Relations Committee
Internal Education Committee
Program Committee
LP News
Legal Action Committee
Budget
These were real committees with multiple members. As can be seen from their reports, they were actually doing substantial work between meetings. And they delivered reports in advance as opposed to having people sitting their reading their reports out loud.
Of course, the 1991 LNC actually spent considerable time in days gone by on the substantive conduct of its operations, as witness the following motion by Karen Allard as passed by the LNC by 1991:
Whereas contributors above a designated amount are promised a lifetime membership, and
Whereas the LP is thereby obligated to provide certain benefits over the Member’s or organization’s lifetime whichever is less, and
Whereas these benefits constitute a long-term liability on the part of the Party,
Therefore be it resolved that the LP fund this long-term liability according to the following terms:
1. That ninety percent (90%) of all designated Life Member-ships be deposited into a Perpetual Trust in the name of the LNC.
2. That ninety percent (90%) of the earnings on said Trust be distributed to the General Fund each quarter.
3. That the Fund be administered by a Board of Trustees comprised of three Trustees, each serving for a six year term.
4. That, whether in case of end of term, resignation, or other vacancy, the Chair of the LNC shall appoint the Trustees and the appointment shall be ratified by two thirds (2/3) vote of the LNC during the next regularly scheduled meeting.
5. That the terms of office of each Trustee be staggered in such a manner that one Trustee is appointed every two years.
6. That the Senior Trustee shall preside over meetings of the Board of Trustees.
7. That a Trustee may be removed from office by two thirds (2/3) vote of the LNC, but only by cause related to management of the Fund.
Upon adoption of this resolution the Chair shall be charged with nominating one Trustee for a two (2) year term, one Trustee for a (4) year term, and one Trustee for a six (6) year term. The announcement of nomination shall be at least thirty (30) days in advance of the next regularly scheduled meeting.
That’s how a serious LNC protects the moneys entrusted to it by the members. Well, that was how a serious LNC in days gone by protected the moneys entrusted to it by its life members. Those moneys are now gone. Ho wever, we can bring that past back to life.
The Distant Prospect
Where do we want to go?
To bring the libertarian future to the United States, we need to become the majority party, with regular control of Congress, the White House, state legislatures, and state houses across America. We don’t need to reach a one-party state like Massachusetts — that would be bad for us as well as for our country. We do need to be the political movement that sets the agenda, our libertarian agenda in which private Americans are able to choose their own futures.
Clearly, we are not going to become the majority party over-night. We are not going to become the majority party during the terms of office of the next National Committee. However, we should never lose sight of the ultimate objective, for if we do we will wander lost in political fever-swamps.
What do we need to reach the Libertarian political majority?
On one hand, there are the factors that will define us as the majority party. On the other hand, there are the social struc-tures and groups of people that will win us our majorities. Finally, there are the methods and tools that will start moving us in the right directions.
Your National Committee is not an electoral majority. It is not by itself the social groups and individuals who will win us majority status. What today’s LNC can and must do is to start putting in place those methods and tools. That’s right, the LNC can lay the foundation for the great political engine that will move us from small minority to political majority.
Let’s go back to those needs.
First, what are the factors that will define us as the political majority? They include:
*an incumbent pool
*strong candidates for every office at every level
*a large, supportive voter base
*concrete libertarian policies that actually work and are seen as working.
Second, which social structures will create and sustain our libertarian majority?
*Effective political party groups:
National Party
State Parties
Local political groups
*Libertarian affinity groups
*Libertarian think tanks
*Libertarian political consulting and polling houses
*Libertarian main-stream media
*Libertarian litigators and journalists
Finally, what are the tools and methods the National Commit-tee can start creating *now*. That’s how we’ll begin this very long march. We start taking small steps that get us moving in
the right direction. I’ve already talked about some of those tools and methods. They include
*Activist support
*Volunteer mobilization
*Candidate recruitment, support, and training
*Group formation and development
*Vibrant, active parties in every state, D.C., Puerto Rico, and wherever else our flag flies
*Outreach and Advertising
*Web and internet mobilization
*Literature and web templates
*Sound resource management
*Effective fundraising
That’s why I am running for LNC Treasurer.
I hope that you will support me.

Presuming they genuinely both want significantly less government than we have now, yes, until and unless we get to the point where government has actually shrunk to a level where one of them does not want it to become any smaller.
ralph writes “As an alliance of people at different levels…”. Huh? WAR and Angela Keaton are in an alliance? That thought defies comprehension.
The apologists within the LP who have for years talked about how such a “big tent” alliance is good for the party seem to have forgotten one biggy. IT HASN’T WORKED FOR 40 YEARS! Einstein’s definition of insanity applies perfectly here.
Pick a principle, LP, and stick with it.
Wondering about that also.
The LP members champion rights and challenge state cults, and to do so they formed a party standing for moving policy in the direction of voluntary governance, which may involve as options no or limited government–options, under the Dallas protocol, to be decided by the users: the LP’s responsibility is to make people aware of the options, not decide for them.
As an alliance of people at different levels, its present rallying cry is less government, more rights. Good ‘nuf for gummint work.
Its broad mission is to help people develop libertarian societies. Its specific mission is to help people get into office to move policy in a libertarian direction. Recently it decided that means focus on elected, though if you get appointed to something (like US President, an appointive office) the LP Chair will still love you.
The LNC is encharged with chartering parties and organizations or helping members know about groups to these ends; handling Fed paperwork; and seeing to a convention which generally educates, informs and gets some people nominated or fired up to seek office. It’s been trying for some time to get the states to zero in on ballot access and kill the problem, not waste energy on costly petitions. Its job is NOT to do anything about candidates–it has created another group, LNCC, to do that.
Given this very limited agenda it has from the members, I see by the website and Facebook it seems to be doing all of these things pretty well: There’re parties in every state (I remeber when there weren’t not so long ago–in some cases we even have two!) plus links to all kinds of affinity groups (I remember when there were 2: LIO and ISIL) many of which it –basically– helped found plus an array of web and educational tools for the members to get busy we only dreamed of even a few years ago; nobody’s in jail for not filling the paperwork or other hanky-panky (unlike the other parties);, and –while I’m no fan of the Convention fees and have some differences with the likely candidates– it looks like a hell of a Convention and the likely candidates are very good, especially compared to the other guys in the major parties, plus a good training conference that will have many benefits in future years plus many networking activities.
Sure, the LNC members may over-react sometimes, but they’re generally philosopher kings and titans of professional management compared to most political groups and corporate boards. I’ve seen a few.
All the things George is talking about are basically in the activist strategic plan. The activists didn’tt think LNC should do them, just that activists should see that they’re done. I think George has done a lot to get people motivated and appreciate his article.
I’m sure I forgot a few things LNC is supposed to do but over the years it keeps coming back to those and things are happening as they’re supposed to. The party is far from irrelevant, it is following its strategic goals as far as I can see, but also its just part of a wider plan and timetable very different from what some expect.
I would say if you like what George is saying, start in your neighborhood and stick with it.
None of George’s BIG PLANS have the slightest chance in hell of ever happening until the LP decides what it stands for. The options are:
1. constitutionally limited government, or
2. no government.
If the party chooses 1. and purges those who oppose, George’s BIG PLANS are a long shot, be they might happen.
If the party chooses 2. and purges those who oppose, then George’s BIG PLANS will never happen but at least the party can be a cohesive educational tool for the advancement of agorism.
If the party continues on the current course of not deciding what it stands for, it is doomed to continued irrelevance and to eventually fade away.
I can’t tell whether the editorial comment “positive article” is an attempt to endorse the article, or a subtle suggestion that it’s unusual for George to be “positive”.
I’m curious to hear George’s analysis of the the LNC’s headquarters building-fund efforts.