Press "Enter" to skip to content

Attorney for Reeves Group Files Response to LPO’s Request to Recover Legal Fees

The attorney for the Reeves Group, Tyler Smith, has filed a response to the request from the Libertarian Party of Oregon to the court to recover attorney fees.

ResponsetoDefMotionforFindings (P0337312) by Wes Wagner

 

Here is the Motion for Findings filed by the Libertarian Party of Oregon.

 

For background of this dispute, here are a couple links:

Motion for Summary Judgement

Libertarian Party of Oregon Lawsuit Dismissed

 

 

 

10 Comments

  1. paulie June 19, 2013

    *virtual popcorn*

  2. Jill Pyeatt Post author | June 18, 2013

    7 & 8: Interesting indeed

  3. paulie June 18, 2013

    Should be interesting 🙂

  4. Oregon Libertarian June 18, 2013

    A hearing on the issue of fees has been set at July 18th, at 11:30.

  5. Jill Pyeatt Post author | June 17, 2013

    I believe the Reeves group put quite a bit of weight on that video to prove their case, even though at least one of us here on IPR warned thm it really wasn’t going to convince anyone that the Reeves group were the good guys.

  6. Wes Wagner June 17, 2013

    FJ@4

    Yes it does take a very special person to re-imagine events such that the perpetrator of violence is somehow now the victim.

    Since the facts are not really relevant to the case we have not been bothering to correct the record. There are only so many lies you can waste your energy disputing when the other side’s strategy is to tell so many lies you can’t keep up with all of them.

  7. Fred Jabin June 16, 2013

    I love the part where they try to make it look like Dave Terry pushing someone at the meeting is somehow a justification for them suing the party. They even try to make it sound as if Wagner questioning Terry’s intentions was somehow a threat to Terry.

  8. George Phillies June 13, 2013

    @2 I imagine that the other party gets to correct the record, because they get I believe a response to what you are now seeing. Then I gather the judge has to decide whether or not to grant the fees or two require that the matter be argued/litigated/in there someplace.

  9. Thomas L. Knapp June 13, 2013

    Are written legal filings subject to perjury penalties, and does intentional omision of material facts constitute perjury?

    It seems to me that Smith should be sanctioned for his blatant misrepresentation of the LNC’s position.

  10. From Der Sidelines June 13, 2013

    Desperate times for desperate people…that’s what this brief (which isn’t brief) is all about.

Comments are closed.