Press "Enter" to skip to content

Barr on Ike: ‘Let the people go home’

Via LP.org

“There is something inherently wrong with the government forcibly keeping people away from their homes and property,” says Bob Barr, the Libertarian Party’s nominee for president, in response to the government’s continuing and heavy-handed attempt to bar Hurricane Ike evacuees from returning to their homes in Texas.

“There is, of course, an obvious risk to returning to a disaster area,” says Barr. “However, government should not forcibly prevent evacuees from returning to their own houses and property. It is their choice, for better or for worse, to return to their homes.”

Galveston officials initially allowed residents to return, but soon after rescinded the policy for fear of traffic backups and other problems. In some parts of Texas, martial law is being considered to forcibly expel hundreds of residents who refuse to leave their homes.

“It is absurd to keep people from their property when they willingly return or have remained,” Barr observes. “Instead, the government makes them refugees, reliant on the inefficient and expensive ‘charity’ of government.”

“During hurricane Katrina, the government said, ‘Trust us,’ and look what happened. Now, the government is saying the same thing again,” notes Barr. “Yet, many of these people would be better off on their own instead of in the hands of FEMA or some other government agency.”

“Government has no right to keep people from their property,” Barr insists. “Let the people go home.”

Libertarian Party presidential candidate Bob Barr represented the 7th District of Georgia in the U. S. House of Representatives from 1995 to 2003.

The Libertarian Party is America’s third largest political party, founded in 1971 as an alternative to the two main political parties. You can find more information on the Libertarian Party by visiting www.LP.org. The Libertarian Party proudly stands for smaller government, lower taxes and more freedom.

11 Comments

  1. Ross Levin September 19, 2008

    I guess I just instinctively disagreed with GE. I spoke too soon.

  2. svf September 19, 2008

    Holy shit, I agree with G.E. too… drinks all the way around, I’m buying!

  3. Jim Rongstad September 19, 2008

    Double checking my thinking here as I agree with GE. 🙂

  4. Mike Theodore September 19, 2008

    Same here, but I was talking more image in general, not this particular issue. Badly worded.

  5. Ross Levin September 19, 2008

    The more I think about it, the more I’m disagreeing with myself…

  6. paulie cannoli Post author | September 19, 2008

    I’m with GE on this.

  7. G.E. September 19, 2008

    WTF? Decrying the government’s prohibition of people having access to their own homes is “bad for our image”???

    You two have bad, bad cases of Stockholm Syndrome. The public schools have clearly gotten better at brainwashing the brightest kids.

  8. Mike Theodore September 19, 2008

    It is GE, but I’m with Ross on this one. Being the image media whore I am, I note we’re not to good at picking our battles, with the exception being battle everything everyone believed in…ever.

  9. Ross Levin September 19, 2008

    Maybe the government is cleaning up the roads, maybe they’re fixing piping, or doing something else that would require people to leave. Granted, there is something wrong with it, but, like I said, there are better issues to argue for smaller government. I guess it’s just one press release, though.

  10. G.E. September 19, 2008

    Really? Preventing people from access to their own property is a “fringe” issue or something?

    No, it’s evil.

  11. Ross Levin September 19, 2008

    Barr could find a better issue to use to argue for small government…

Comments are closed.