Press "Enter" to skip to content

Darryl Perry: ‘California’s Proposition 19: Yes We Cannabis’

By Darryl W. Perry
Chair, Boston Tea Party National Committee:

This fall Californians will be able to vote to completely legalize the herb commonly called “marijuana”. NBC Los Angeles reports the “California Chamber of Commerce on Thursday released a legal analysis that claims Proposition 19 would lead to more workplace accidents by forcing employers to let workers smoke pot on the job.” The California Chamber of Commerce website states, “If this measure were approved, employers, including the State of California, would be faced with the burden of proving that an employee who tests positive for marijuana is “actually impaired” from performing the job before taking any adverse action against the employee. This process would delay disciplinary actions used to protect workplace safety and drive up costs due to increased litigation.”

The Chamber is under the impression that employers would not be able to implement “drug free” workplace policies. I have to wonder if the California Chamber of Commerce is also worried about workers going to work intoxicated or under the influence of over-the-counter sleeping pills? I’m sure someone can create a test to determine how much THC is in someone’s system, similar to a test showing how much alcohol is in someone’s system. writes on the history of marijuana, “For most of human history, marijuana has been completely legal. It’s not a recently discovered plant, nor is it a long-standing law. Marijuana has been illegal for less than 1% of the time that it’s been in use. Its known uses go back further than 7,000 B.C. and it was legal as recently as when Ronald Reagan was a boy.

The marijuana (hemp) plant, of course, has an incredible number of uses. The earliest known woven fabric was apparently of hemp, and over the centuries the plant was used for food, incense, cloth, rope, and much more. This adds to some of the confusion over its introduction in the United States, as the plant was well known from the early 1600′s, but did not reach public awareness as a recreational drug until the early 1900′s.

William Randolph Hearst used “yellow journalism” to smear cannabis and cannabis ussers, with articles stating:

“Users of marijuana become STIMULATED as they inhale the drug and are LIKELY TO DO ANYTHING. Most crimes of violence in this section, especially in country districts are laid to users of that drug.”

“Was it marijuana, the new Mexican drug, that nerved the murderous arm of Clara Phillips when she hammered out her victim’s life in Los Angeles?… THREE-FOURTHS OF THE CRIMES of violence in this country today are committed by DOPE SLAVES — that is a matter of cold record.” further explains that Hearst was “then supported by Dupont chemical company and various pharmaceutical companies in the effort to outlaw cannabis. Dupont had patented nylon, and wanted hemp removed as competition. The pharmaceutical companies could neither identify nor standardize cannabis dosages, and besides, with cannabis, folks could grow their own medicine and not have to purchase it from large companies.”

Marijuana became illegal because of false-fear and to help a small group of powerful men retain power and control. The truth is, regardless if cannabis (marijuana) is legal or illegal people will still use it. However, by keeping it illegal, the “authorities” are forcing a dangerous black market, the exact opposite of their desired intentions.

If you believe that you and you alone own yourself and you are responsible for your actions; you must also acknowledge that neither you nor any group of people have the right or authority to tell someone (without their consent) what they can or cannot do that does not harm another person. If you believe in freedom and live in California, don’t listen to the smear campaign and support Prop 19. If you live elsewhere, call and write your “representative” asking them to introduce similar legislation. In the absence of these laws, feel free to practice “civil disobedience” but be aware of the consequences.

In Peace, Freedom, Love & Liberty,
Darryl W. Perry
Chair Boston Tea Party National Committee
Managing Editor Free Patriot Press
2016 candidate for President of the United States of America

About Post Author


  1. Darryl W. Perry Darryl W. Perry August 26, 2010

    @Mark, please note the BTP was founded in 2006 and should NOTbe confused with the Beck/Palin supported groups using the name “tea party”. The BTP has a one sentence platform, “The BTP supports reducing the size, scope and power of government at all levels and on all issues, and opposes increasing the size, scope and power of government at any level, for any purpose.” In October 2008, the party’s National Convention adopted the four point program of the Campaign for Liberty. The program called for an end to overseas occupation, a restoration of privacy and other liberties, no increase in the national debt, and a thorough review of the Federal Reserve. During the 2010 convention the Party adopted a new program to End the Wars of Aggression, End the Fed, End the War on Drugs, End the Abuses of Liberty, End the Immigration Fiasco.

  2. Mark Mark August 25, 2010

    After reading this I don’t think I gave the Tea Party a fair shake. Kudos for a great opinion that embraces limited government and less messing with people’s personal lives.

  3. Hemprenuer Dave Hemprenuer Dave August 16, 2010

    Up until now, politics has trumped science. Look where it had gotten us – deep sea drilling, plastic soup in our oceans, pollution from coal and oil – a NON-SUSTAINABLE situation. Hemp can literally SAVE THE PLANET!

    Another interesting article as to why hemp is illegal can be found at my web-site at

    Hemprenuer Dave
    Solutions for an Emerging Industry
    First Network Marketing Company in the Hemp Industry

  4. sniffle dog!!! sniffle dog!!! August 16, 2010

    the point that calimann makes is correct. employers are not obligated to allow employees to use substances on the job or at the work place just because a substance is legal. and if an employee shows up under the influence of anything that affects their job, legal or not, cant they be sent home and/or fired? i would hope so and i think marijuana should be treated the same.

  5. Michael Michael August 16, 2010

    The article is correct about the original reasons for the prohibition, racism and greed, but in the 70’s, a new reason came into play.

    Marijuana is identified with the counter-culture in this country. It has become identified with questioning authority (and most people who have watched the news while stoned knows why), independent thought and an unwillingness to go along with what we’re “supposed” to do. This scares the hell out of them.

    From “Reefer Madness” to the report by the Chamber of Commerce, all they have are lies, which have worked for them in the past and they are hoping they will still work in November.

  6. calimann calimann August 16, 2010

    The argument about stoned workers is bullshit, what about all the drunk workers? You can buy alcohol anytime anyplace, so the workers must all be drunk all the time right?

  7. bryan bryan August 16, 2010

    And still today the power mongers are trying to snuff out the legalization effort for the exact same reasons. PERSONAL interest and not the PEOPLES interest

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

20 + twelve =