Press "Enter" to skip to content

David Graves: Why I Support the Constitution Party

The Constitution Party website is running a series of comments from readers on why they support the CP. The latest one is from David Graves.

My Story – David Graves

I have always been politically conservative, but never really wanted to align with a party. I usually favored the Republican choice for President unless there was a good independant running. I just thought that any Republican is gotta be better than a Democrat, so regardless if I liked a candidate, I would vote for the lesser of two evils.

It was only after the GOP chose guys like Romney, Guliani, and McCain as their ‘”best choices”, that I realized we were in trouble!!

When they bypassed true conservatives like Duncan Hunter and Ron Paul, and chose McCain to lead them, i could not support them. I watched as the so called conservatives made fun of and trashed Ron Paul and his supporters, and then when it came down to Obama and McCAIN, I chose Chuck Baldwin because I had to vote my conscience and not for who the establishment told me to vote for.

I thank God that I have a true third party option now in the Costitution Party, instead of selling out to Party politics!! No more towing the red and blue lines for me now, at least on a national level anyway.

God bless,
David Graves

10 Comments

  1. Cody Quirk October 21, 2010

    Is that the best you got? You sound like a 5 year old. Go wrap some more toilet paper around your head.

    And the CP keeps on growing, especially in Colorado and Nevada!

  2. Jeep tracks // Oct 15, 2010:
    “Nice comments Cody!” *sarcasm*

    SNEAKIE SNARKIE CYBER PUNK AND INTERNET BULLY, CODY QUIRK, hey do ADDITIONAL research. Post choice for mindless potty mouth and ‘pick, pick, pick’ sub human political bull dog! Do the research!

    Aunt Nadine, Aunt Nadine, time to roll up that news paper [alternative post or main stream media]!

    Quirk Boy has failed in High School, college, Calfironia AIP and still embarrasses LDS, IAP and Aunt Nadine Hansen, at the same time he sponges off of her good will.

    Ya give folks the benefit of a doubt (like Jim King and Chelene Ward Nightingale) and like a bad odor, they keep on proving their essence!

  3. Cody Quirk October 19, 2010

    And don’t forget bring Lake the toilet paper!

  4. ….. just look at the activists ‘ [Lake] // Oct 19, 2010 at 8:09 pm

    Per Don Grundmann // Oct 18, 2010:

    Concerning Mister Gibbs – REviewing Constitution Party, Grundmann, Quirk, Gary Odom, Lussenhiede, Jim King, Nightingale, TEA Parties, Dem moles, GOP moles:

    [a] pull your panties up

    [b] make sure your socks and shoes are on straight

    [c] run fast

    [d] run far

  5. Coons interrupted her to say, “One of those indispensable principles is the separation of church and state.”

    “Where in the Constitution is the separation of church and state?” O’Donnell asked, a statement that drew laughter from the audience. When Coons returned to the topic a few minutes later, he said her comment “reveals her fundamental misunderstanding of what our Constitution is.”

    “The First Amendment establishes the separation, the fact that the federal government shall not establish religion,” Coons said.

    “The First Amendment does?” O’Donnell interrupted. “You’re telling me that the separation of church and state is found in the First Amendment?”

    When Coons summarized the amendment as saying government shall make no law establishing religion, O’Donnell interrupted again: “That’s in the First Amendment?”

    Her comments, in a debate aired on radio station WDEL, generated a buzz in the audience.

    “You actually audibly heard the crowd gasp,” Widener University political scientist Wesley Leckrone said after the debate, adding that it raised questions about O’Donnell’s grasp of the Constitution.

    [Lake: and in the larger sense, the Constitution Party’s grasp of the Constitution! As the local United States Tax Payers Party, the California American Independent Party did not seem to much care about tax payers. As the local Constitution Party ………….]

  6. As some one whom is actually registered to vote in Sandy Ego County, m;ay be the Duncans Hunter are both poster thugs for voting out the incumbents.

    And on a more local scale, there is always any San Diego County Supervisor, but especially Bill Horn!

  7. Timothy Yung October 15, 2010

    Well back when I was a neo-con I supported Duncan Hunter. He was the best neo-con candidate. In fact I would say he was the best second-best candidate in the Republican field second of course to Ron Paul.

  8. Red Phillips October 15, 2010

    Yeah, that surprised me too paulie. Duncan Hunter was more “conservative” by degree than someone like Romney or McCain. As is Ron Paul in a certain way of thinking about it. So I could see how someone could make that mistake in a Gestalt way if he was unaware of how the two differ on the particulars.

  9. [a] see what I mean?

    [b] ‘true third party option’?

    [c] more California southland cow poo:

    Elsewhere:

    » The [Pro Establishment San Diego] U-T is refusing to endorse embattled County Supervisor Bill Horn, saying he has “more baggage than a Lindbergh Field luggage carousel.”

    (Har!) But the paper won’t support his opponent either.

    http://www.voiceofsandiego.com

  10. paulie October 15, 2010

    Duncan Hunter? yikes.

Comments are closed.