Posted by Donny Ferguson at LP.org.
Reposted to IPR by Paulie.
The non-partisan Congression Budget Office reports the current economic slump will end sometime around mid-2009.
Keep in mind Obama himself admits any effect he thinks his government expansion will have on the economy won’t take place until 2010 — well after the slump will end anyway.
Between that, and the CBO’s research last week showing Obama plan will cause long-term damage to the economy, and that the economy will bounce back faster without the package, why is the Senate even considering a $1,100,000,000,000.00 Frankenstein’s moster of wealth transfers and fatter government?
It probably has much to do with the fact much of the money lines the pockets of groups that deliver votes to Democrats, and much of that borrowed taxpayer money could even end up in Democrat campaign accounts by way of funneling through labor unions, ACORN and such.
The only thing the package appears to be stimulating are government growth and Democrat vote-delivering mechanisms.
From wikipedia on Taoism:
Sexuality
See also: Taoist sexual practices
From a Western perspective, the Taoist view of sexuality is considerably more at ease. The body is not viewed as a dangerous source of evil temptation, but rather as a positive asset. Taoism rejects Western mind-body dualism; mind and body are not set in contrast or opposition with each other. Sex is treated as a vital component to romantic love, however Taoism emphasizes the need for self-control and moderation. Complete abstinence is oftentimes treated as equally dangerous as excessive sexual indulgence. The sexual vitality of men is portrayed as limited, while the sexual energy of women is viewed as boundless.
Me, @
https://independentpoliticalreport.com/2009/02/party-for-socialism-and-liberation-a-statement-from-leonard-peltier/comment-page-1/#comment-38883
Earlier, I said
open source tends to be better at finding and correcting problems than a centralized alternative.
The same, I think, is true of the economy, and is also how ?nature?/the environment works.
To expand on this in a slightly different direction, this is also why I think anarchism can work.
There is a tendency towards spontaneous order in society, and in nature. It works best when it is not centrally planned and organized.
For instance, see I, Pencil.
I think Lao Tzu, the founder of Taoism, was as far as I know the first writer to address these subjects.
He may have also been the first libertarian (at least in writings that have survived and been translated into the world’s most commonly used languages).
More recently, some of the insights of Taoism have been rediscovered and given new life by recent developments in science, for example The Tao of Physics (full title: The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels Between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism) , a 1975 book by physicist Fritjof Capra.
Also of interest in exploring this dynamic balance interplay of entropy and extropy in the creation of spontaneous order, “G?del, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid (commonly GEB) is a Pulitzer Prize-winning book by Douglas Hofstadter, described by the author as “a metaphorical fugue on minds and machines in the spirit of Lewis Carroll”.”
Steve Newton at Delaware Libertarian:
http://delawarelibertarian.blogspot.com/2009/02/metaphor-and-public-policy-danger-of.html
Steve Gordon at Gordon Unleashed:
http://gordonunleashed.com/blog/2009/02/09/economic-enhancement/
My comments:
1.
If we are going to continue with the sexual analogies, here’s a thought: Obama certainly isn’t going to stimulate me with a trillion-pound lady who has pork grease dripping off her chin.
…but thanks for the mental image.
If history can be used to predict the future, tomorrow’s Playboy Playmates will be even trimmer than today’s are.
Pretty soon, I won’t know whether I want to bang them or snort them off a mirror with a rolled up bill.
2.
See here about “priming the pump”
http://delawarelibertarian.blogspot.com/2009/02/metaphor-and-public-policy-danger-of.html
Maybe you can work that into some quip about pecker pumps. Or maybe thin seriously on the topic of “implications of applying the study of complex non-linear systems to social sciences, especially economics” – and relate that to the differences between male and female sexual response, with the Keynesian pump-priming view serving as a caricature of male shortcomings, or something like that.
There’s gotta be something there, and you can probably think of a good way to write it up.
The CBO must be dreaming. I think this slump is barely getting started, and will go a lot deeper.
And I’m usually an optimist.