In early 2011 the Boston Tea Party National Committee passed a resolution supporting War Crimes trials “for every person that has violated the ‘law of war’.” The BTP added that any potential War Crimes trials should be privately funded, instead of being paid for with taxpayer money. It seems that someone listened and on November 23, 2011 former U.S. president George W. Bush and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair were found guilty of war crimes by the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal after a four day hearing in Malaysia. The tribunal was initiated by former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, who is also President of the Perdana Global Peace Foundation, and was modeled after the 1967 tribunal in Sweden and Denmark that found the U.S. guilty of a war of aggression in Vietnam.
The prosecution argued that the U.S. and U.K. had advanced the viewpoint that regime change in Iraq could be the basis for the use of force. “This viewpoint had been expressed as far back as 1998 when president Clinton suggested that Saddam Hussein had to be removed to end his threat. The Iraq Liberation Act passed in 1998 declared that… the regime headed by Saddam Hussein [be removed] from power. This then became the official U.S. policy. Bush and Blair had on various occasions since then expressed this viewpoint.”
The prosecution further argued that “the Doctrine of regime change and doctrine of humanitarian intervention were declared illegal by the International Court of Justice in Nicaragua v U.S. [1986]. The U.S. by passing the Iraq Liberation Act went against the decision in the Nicaragua case.”
The judges agreed and ruled “[t]he 2003 invasion of Iraq was an unlawful act of aggression and an international crime… They acted in flagrant violation of international law of war and peace… We therefore find that the charge against the two accused is proved beyond reasonable doubt.” The tribunal ordered that Bush and Blair’s name be entered in a register of war criminals, urged that they be recognized as such under the Rome Statute, will petition the International Criminal Court to proceed with binding charges and will petition the United Nations to pass a resolution to end the American occupation of Iraq.
The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal is also scheduled to hold a separate hearing next year on charges of torture linked to the Iraq war against Bush, former Vice President Dick Cheney, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and four others.
In Peace, Freedom, Love & Liberty,
Darryl W. Perry
Chair Boston Tea Party National Committee
http://BostonTea.us
Owner/Managing Editor Free Patriot Press
http://FreePatriot-Press.com
2016 candidate for President of the United States of America
http://dwp2016.org
You can read the original article here.
(btw) The new leading R in the polls for POTUS is none other than LONGTIME cardcarrying Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member Newt G.
Have any questions???
The Party may change, but FOREIGN POLICY never will vary from the “gameplan”…….
Lake, haven’t you READ the paper trail through the years? A man of your age should have already figured it out !!!
Are We All Just Pawns on the Grand Chess Board? – http://constitutionpartyoftennessee.com/2011/03/07/are-we-all-just-pawns-on-the-grand-chess-board/
AFP Was Right: U.S. Funding Arab Uprisings: http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/afp_was_right_267.html
“There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years in the early 1960s to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies … but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.” – Carroll Quigley (Georgetown Prof.).
(Bill Clinton said Quigley was his mentor during 1993 Inaugural Address)
“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.” – Carroll Quigley-(Bill Clinton said Quigley was his mentor during 1993 Inaugural Address), speaking of the (CFR) Globalists’ American political strategy since the early twentieth century.
“The Council on Foreign Relations is the American branch of a society which originated in England … [and] … believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established.” – Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton said Quigley was his mentor during 1993 Inaugural Address), speaking of their (CFR’s) political goal since the early twentieth century.
“The dirty little secret is that both houses of Congress are irrelevant. … America’s domestic policy is now being run by Alan Greenspan and the Federal Reserve, and America’s foreign policy is now being run by the International Monetary Fund [IMF]. …when the president decides to go to war, he no longer needs a declaration of war from Congress.” – Robert Reich, Secretary of Labor under Bill Clinton
—
GUILTY! Give me the rope, I’ll help…….
#4 – I will not be seeking public office in 2012. I further ask that you not promote me as a candidate in 2012.
all the real problems in the world and this minute side line just dilutes the real issues ………
Darryl, we expect you to run anyway, we’ll probably be promoting your candidacy if you don’t object. We need to get you in the debate, but you may always stand down if/when elected.
This would be a great article if Darryl wasn’t already a nutjob.
@1 – I am ineligible to run in 2012.
Darryl W. Perry for President in 2012!