For the last few weeks LP.org Blog has picked up its pace of posting about state and local campaigns. I usually try to put up all LP Blog posts here for comment, since there is no public comment on the site itself, but I missed a lot of those posts due to repeated IPR site outages for around a week and a half during that time. I did post some of these articles, and some of the others are virtually identical to past IPR articles, although I or other IPR writers may or may not still post them later. In the meantime, here’s an index of what they have so far:
Libertarian Walters Only Partisan Candidate in Race for SC State House
Armed with Small Government Plan, Mark Grannis Battles for US House Seat in Maryland
MI Libertarian Senate Candidate [Scotty Boman] Commissions Poll to Qualify for Debates; Still Denied
2% for Libertarian Brubaker in Wyoming U.S. House Race Would Secure Ballot Access for LP
Florida Libertarian Takes On Big Government Republican in 2-Way Race for State House
Libertarian Cox Could Swing Key Senate Race in Montana
NH Libertarian John Babiarz for Governor seeks Ballot Access for LP
AZ Libertarian Joe Cobb in 2-way for U.S. House
Scandal-Plagued Republicans Leave Opening for Libertarian Menger in Race for CO House
Libertarian Passarelli Could Win Ballot Status for LP in Connecticut
Utah Libertarian Barry Short for State Rep Seeks to Shrink State Regulatory Agencies, Cut Budget
Libertarian Horning Gaining National Recognition in Heated Indiana Senate Race
Libertarian Dine Could Tip Highly-Contested Missouri Senate Race
Uphill Battle for Libertarian [Bruce Majors] in DC, But Reward Is Possible
GA Libertarian David Staples in 2-Way Race for Public Service Commission
Libertarian Barbara Howe Running Hard for Governor in NC
NH Libertarian Selectman and Former Candidate for State House [Brendan Kelly] Runs for Congress
Arizona Libertarian [Marc Victor]’s debate performance makes him a factor in US Senate race
Maine Libertarian [Andrew Ian Dodge] for US Senate getting visibility
David Moran, WV Libertarian for Governor, running on bold plan to cut taxes and state spending
PA Libertarian Councilman [Erik Viker] Running in 2-Way for State Rep
That covers three pages of posts going back to October 5. There were some more before then, but they were being posted less often and I think we copied all the rest here previously.

SF @ 11: “It has effectively eliminated the California LP.”
With all due respect, Stewart, Top-Two hasn’t really affected us yet, with the exception of not having many people running for office. The real test will be 2014, when we’ll have to have more than 10 percent of the amount of registered Libertarians as we have now.
The only reason the LP even came up with a Proposition list of recommendations is that I asked for it. As Region Chair of the Pasadena group, I’d organized a meeting with reps from 3 of the campaigns and
wanted to make recommendations to my group. I ended u[p doing my own research and made my own recommendations, 3 of which differ from theirs. Perhaps they would have made recommendations without my bugging them, but my meeting was early October, and one would think they might have done it before that.
As Region chair, after the election I plan to organize some registration events. Hopefully some other counties will join us.
I wish there had been some way to fight top two. It has effectively eliminated the California LP.
Jim Gray said at a recent campaign event that he supports GMO labeling.
Oddly only some of these show up on the front page, but I see them in the sidebar when I click on one off the front page. A new one popped up in the sidebar once you click on a link:
http://www.lp.org/blogs/staff/tn-libertarian-us-senate-candidate-and-former-republican-finds-true-fiscal-conservatism-
California does have some LP members who are running for office – most, maybe all, local and non-partisan. I think some are running for re-election. It’s possible LP blog will mention some of them, or already earlier than where I went back to.
I agree that the California LP should be more proactive with its proposition recommendations, but that’s somewhat outside the scope of this post.
Or it might be that it took until six days before the election for HQ to write something about the most winnable race for the LP in the entire country?
Or the weather…horribly cold out today. My iPhone says it is 59 outside and going to be as low as 46 tonight. Too cold…
But it should be back up in the 70s by the weekend.
I’m not sure, New Fudlerist. I guess it is age catching up to me. The government has taken away our freedom, they’ve taxed us to near starvation, and now someone can’t even spell my name right?
Either that, or this horrible cold weather. Must be down in the 60s today.
Why are you so upset, Stuart? 😉
—Start of Rant—
How can they possibly misspell my name? Everyone on staff knows how to spell my name.
Must be someone new writing stuff these days, but if they’re going to quote me…AT LEAST SPELL MY NAME THE RIGHT WAY!!!
—End of Rant—
FKC @ 2: “California is bereft of candidates due to prop 14”. True, but they could and should have been vocal about several of the Propositions.
Thanks for the link to the Boulder speech. I havdn’t had time to listen to it yet.
California is bereft of candidates due to prop 14 “88”.
Johnson said he supports labeling GMOs during his speech in Boulder last night
https://independentpoliticalreport.com/2012/10/broadcast-of-johnson-colorado-appearance-live/
I find it very telling that there aren’t any articles about California’s races, despite the fact that we have so many LP members in this state (well, at least right now we do). We have a few very contentious proposition races, 2 of which have been discussed here (30 and 34). I believe I’ll compile some of the articles written by Libertarians about Proposition 37, which is about labelling of GMOS. It’s a complicated issue which the LP will have to address sooner or later. Rumor has is that GJ said he supports labelling GMO foods yesterday, but I haven’t found any documentation of that yet.