Press "Enter" to skip to content

Constitution Party of Wyoming Organizing Petition Drive to Repeal School Superintendents Law

Published on 

Petition drive led by Wyoming Constitution Party seeks to repeal school superintendents law

By Bob Moen, AP

May 28, 2012


CHEYENNE, Wyoming — Organizers of an effort to repeal changes to the state schools chief’s duties and powers turned in petition signatures to the Wyoming secretary of state’s office with just minutes to spare before the deadline Tuesday.

Petition organizer Jennifer Young, of Torrington, said she isn’t sure how many signatures were collected because of the rush to meet the deadline.

“We were collecting and people were bringing them in from all around the state until the very last minute,” Young said. “People were collecting up until the last moment possible.”

At last count about two weeks ago, about 20,000 signatures had been collected, she said.

Young and others delivered about a half dozen boxes stuffed with petitions just before 5 p.m. when the secretary of state’s office closed for the day.

The secretary of state’s office has 60 days to check to see if they collected 37,606 valid signatures in order to put a referendum on the 2014 general election ballot.

Young said Wyoming’s referendum process makes it difficult to succeed because of cumbersome requirements and a 90-day deadline. But she said she was encouraged by the number of signatures they were able to gather in a short period time — a time that included one of the snowiest Aprils in history in some areas of the state.

“It’s amazing even if there isn’t enough signatures when it’s said and done,” she said.

Young is a member of the Wyoming Constitution Party, which led the drive to repeal the new law that takes away many of the powers and duties of the state superintendent of public instruction.

To read the rest of the article, please go to the following link:–Schools-Superintendent-Petition


About Post Author

Krzysztof Lesiak

I've been a contributor for IPR since January 2013. I consider myself to be a paleoconservative. I'm also the founder of American Third Party Report. Email me at


  1. Cody Quirk Cody Quirk May 30, 2013

    That would be something if they actually got over the required amount

  2. NewFederalist NewFederalist May 31, 2013

    According to Ballot Access News they did not.

  3. Cody Quirk Cody Quirk June 1, 2013

    Yeah, I read that. Though they did come close.

  4. paulie paulie June 1, 2013

    BAN said 21k, not sure if that is raw or valid. Requirement was 37k valid. If it was 21k raw, it may have only been about 10k valid.

  5. Cody Quirk Cody Quirk June 1, 2013

    Feel free to let us know

  6. T. Lee Ryde T. Lee Ryde June 1, 2013

    They won’t count how many valid because they did not even have enough raw.

  7. Sam Kress Sam Kress June 2, 2013

    It seems they only had maybe a quarter of the valid signatures required.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.