Andy Craig: How Accurate Are Polls that Include Third-Party Candidates?

Voting

Voting

Polling companies and media organizations sometimes argue that including third-party candidates in a poll produces an inaccurately high result for that candidate.

In the era of modern polling, there have been seven third-party presidential candidates included through the final polls in early November. Only one time did the difference between the final poll and the actual election result exceed 2%, and that was when Perot over-performed the final poll by five points in 1992.

Not once has a third-party candidate been included in polls, and then under-performed the final poll by more than the margin of error.

2000 Nader -Final Poll: 4% Result: 3%, Error +1%
1996 Perot -Final Poll: 7% Result: 8%, Error -1%
1992 Perot -Final Poll: 14% Result: 19%, Error -5%
1980 Anderson -Final Poll: 8% Result: 7%, Error +1%
1968 G. Wallace -Final Poll: 15% Result: 14%, Error -1%
1948 H. Wallace -Final Poll: 4% Result: 2%, Error +2%
1948 Thurmond -Final Poll: 2% Result: 2%, Error 0%

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_polling_for_U.S._Presidential_elections

This entry was posted in Third parties, general on by .

About Caryn Ann Harlos

Caryn Ann Harlos is a paralegal residing in Castle Rock, Colorado and presently serving as the Region 1 Representative on the Libertarian National Committee and is a candidate for LNC Secretary at the 2018 Libertarian Party Convention. Articles posted should NOT be considered the opinions of the LNC nor always those of Caryn Ann Harlos personally. Caryn Ann's goal is to provide information on items of interest and (sometimes) controversy about the Libertarian Party and minor parties in general not to necessarily endorse the contents.

5 thoughts on “Andy Craig: How Accurate Are Polls that Include Third-Party Candidates?

  1. Shawn Levasseur

    Of course this is all before the current era of polling, where people actively resist unsolicited phone calls, have unlisted numbers, and get oversaturated with political phone calls, both robotic and human.

  2. Zeleni

    There’s also a difference between early polling and the final poll before an election. It would be interesting to see that comparison for third party candidates. I wonder if others have seen the 10% plus that Johnson’s experiencing and seen it vanish.

  3. Just Some Random Guy

    “I wonder if others have seen the 10% plus that Johnson’s experiencing and seen it vanish.”

    I’m not sure any have seen 10% to begin with. There was Ross Perot, but I think he held onto it in the two elections. Between then and now, I don’t think any third party candidates got to 10% to begin with.

  4. Zeleni

    Looking at that link, there does appear to be a pattern of collapsed performance. John Anderson’s peak polling was three times his final result, while Perot and Nader’s runs saw peaks of twice the actual result (although we can point to Perot’s failings). We don’t know if Johnson and Stein have peaked yet. But either way it appears we’ll have a record breaking result for Libertarians and a strong showing for the Greens. Best guess is Johnson around 7% and Stein below Nader around 2%.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *