Press "Enter" to skip to content

Libertarian Party Judicial Committee Overturns Suspension of National Secretary

In a decision issued Tuesday, the Libertarian Party’s Judicial Committee overturned the suspension of National Secretary Caryn Ann Harlos, nullifying an earlier move by the Libertarian National Committee.

The decision comes as a response to an appeal filed in late October by Prof. George Phillies, challenging eight votes made by the Libertarian National Committee related to an investigation into Harlos’ conduct. The charges included allegations of gross misconduct and behavior deemed harmful to the operations of the Libertarian Party. Specific claims centered on Harlos filing presidential ticket paperwork with the Colorado Secretary of State against the instructions of the Libertarian National Committee Chair and allegedly maligning fellow committee members.

In the 57-page document, first published by Third Party Watch, the Judicial Committee invalidated all charges, specifications, and trial-related resolutions against Harlos, declaring them “null and void for failure to allege conduct that can reasonably be characterized as rising to a standard required for prosecution,” as outlined in the Libertarian National Committee Policy Manual.

The majority opinion, authored by Blay Tarnoff, emphasized that the charges failed to meet the thresholds of “gross malfeasance” or “failure to perform the duties of office” and that procedural due process, as required under the bylaws and Robert’s Rules of Order, had not been followed. The committee concluded that the allegations lacked sufficient evidence to warrant disciplinary action, rendering the Libertarian National Committee’s actions procedurally flawed.

Joining Tarnoff in the majority opinion were Stephan Kinsella and Rob Stratton, as well as Mike Seebeck and Marc Montoni, in part. Seebeck also wrote his own concurring opinion, which was joined by Montoni.

Dissenting opinions by Judicial Committee members Ken Krawchuk and Rob Latham argued that the Judicial Committee lacked jurisdiction over the matter and that the Libertarian National Committee’s actions were justified under its bylaws. However, these views were overruled by the majority.

The ruling reinstates Harlos to her position, which had been temporarily filled by alternate member Adrian Malagon as Secretary Pro Tem. It also raises broader concerns about internal party governance, with the Judicial Committee criticizing the Libertarian National Committee’s handling of the case. “This entire saga was a giant waste of time, energy, and stress that was completely avoidable if the LNC simply did its job correctly as the Secretary did, instead of engaging in unnecessary attempts to act in the exact same way their predecessors did that led those predecessors to be voted out of office,” wrote Seebeck in his concurring opinion.

Additionally, the ruling included recommendations for reform, urging the Libertarian National Committee to amend its policy manual to simplify the disciplinary process and clarify existing procedural standards to prevent future conflicts.

Following the ruling, LNC Chair Angela McArdle reportedly emailed Judicial Committee members, stating, “Either our attorneys or I will be in touch tomorrow afternoon.” The LNC is scheduled to meet in Rhode Island later this month for its next business meeting, which Harlos has already stated she plans to attend.

Editorial note: Prof. George Phillies is a member of the Independent Political Report editorial team. He was not consulted for this article nor was this author involved with the appeal.

8 Comments

  1. Nuña December 13, 2024
  2. Rick December 8, 2024

    Can Seeneck be thrown off of the JC? He’s clearly biased for Harlos, always has been. No way he can be impatial.

  3. Bob December 8, 2024

    Seebeck should have recused himself.

    Did Harlos pay off the committee for this favorable ruling? It’s clear as day to anyone who can look at this objectively she is guilty and the removal was done properly.

  4. Nuña December 5, 2024

    lol what a joke of an injudicial committee

    Latham’s dissent is a weaselly joke, Krawchuk is the only one with even a singular cojon.

    Statist Seebeck pretending that its criminal buddy Harlos (talk about conflict of interest) did its job correctly while the LNC didn’t, should be enough cause to kick it out of the injudicial committee if not the party. What a socialist sack of shit! But we knew that already from its complicity in defrauding the national convention.

    Anyway, if it is a stand-off the injudicial committee want, they have just set up the board for it and given LNC the opening move in a game that will likely destroy what little is left of the national party.

    Hopefully the LNC will continue to let Malagon act as secretary at Rhode Island, and bar Harlos from trespassing at the meeting – much less pretending she is secretary still/again.

  5. J. M. Jacobs December 5, 2024

    They did not overturn the removal, which is interesting. They void motions that were no longer in effect.

    The Bylaws (Article 6.7) state: “The Judicial Committee shall either affirm the National Committee’s suspension of the officer or order the officer’s reinstatement within 30 days of the hearing. Failure of the Judicial Committee to rule within 30 days shall constitute an affirmation of the National Committee’s suspension of the officer. ”

    The Judicial Committee has not done this and the have scheduled a hearing on Harlos’s removal on 12/14.

    The LNC is asking for clarification of their position.

  6. José C December 4, 2024

    Congratulations to George Phillies on this victory. We in the Libertarian Party are all better of for it.

  7. NewFederalist December 4, 2024

    Good for the JC to have the huevos to stand up to the tinpot tyrant. I guess Krawchuk checked his cojones at the door.

  8. Observer December 4, 2024

    lol what a joke of an organization

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

16 + 12 =

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.