Press "Enter" to skip to content

Boston Tea Party Response to the 2010 State of the Union Address

President Obama claims “that if we did not act” on “an economy rocked by
severe recession, a financial system on the verge of collapse, and a
government deeply in debt” that “we might face a second depression.” I’d
like to remind the President that his actions, as well as Congressional
actions and those of the Federal Reserve have not helped, but instead
caused higher inflation ad more federal debt. In fact, the Federal
government’s deficit from 2009 was the largest in American history. And
contrary to his opinion, “the worst” has not passed. Declining prices of
houses are not the problem, the problem was the “housing bubble” caused by
lose credit & risky lending, much of which was backed by the government.
The “decline” in “value” is nothing more than a return to where the prices
should have been. Attempting to keep prices high is nothing more than
trying to re-inflate a bubble that has already burst – and never should
have been inflated to begin with.

The President also claims he made the “financial rescue program”
“transparent and accountable.” Yet, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke
and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner both refuse to tell Congress which
banks received “bailout” money. And just 3 months ago the Recovery
Accountability and Transparency Board was exposed for having posted false
data, claiming 440 “phantom districts” had received nearly $6.4 billion
and only “saved or created” 28429.7 jobs. How is that “transparent”? More
importantly, how has the “recovered” money been handled? Has that money
been removed from circulation? It was “created” by the Federal Reserve
before it was given to the banks; if it isn’t removed from the money
supply, it will only further increase inflation. Until banks are no longer
allowed to practice the fraud known as fractional reserve banking and
interest rates are no longer kept artificially low the financial markets
will not be “stable”. There will continue to be “booms & busts.”

The President claims to have “cut taxes for 95% of working families… for
small businesses…. for first-time homebuyers… for parents trying to
care for their children & for 8 million Americans paying for college.”
These were NOT tax cuts, they were tax credits. By doing so, the President
& Congress are trying to encourage certain actions. He also claims to have
added two million jobs, the vast majority of which are government jobs,
most of the remainder are dependent on government contracts.
While I applaud his plan to eliminate capital gains taxes on small
businesses, I’d like to ask that instead of proposing more “tax credits”
and “incentives” he ask Congress to eliminate the income tax & abolish the
IRS. Doing so would greatly encourage economic growth without “steering”
their actions to those preferred by a group of bureaucrats.

The President laid out an energy policy that doesn’t allow individual
choices about alternative energy sources. While I support alternative
energy, it is not and should not be the government’s job to dictate which
energy sources people use.

He also claimed, again, that further government involvement in “health
care” will reduce yearly budget deficits and somehow cause medical costs
to go down, something that hasn’t happened since the government first
involved itself in the health care industry in 1965 with the creation of
Medicare.

The President says he wants to “freeze” spending, but “spending related to
our national security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will not be
affected.” And says he’s identified $20 billion in savings for next year –
$20 billion out of a $4 trillion budget is only a drop in the bucket –
0.5% (½ of 1 percent) to be exact, which is the equivalent of the average
household saving $251. But, I digress, President Obama claims he “go
through the budget line by line to eliminate programs that we can’t afford
and don’t work.” How about comparing the budget with the Constitution and
eliminating what isn’t authorized by the Constitution? Doing so would
result in cutting approximately 60% of federal spending and drastically
reduce or eliminate the amount of unfunded future liabilities – currently
estimated at $107 trillion. The government is bankrupt, the only solution
is decreasing spending, not simply “freezing” spending on certain
programs.

I would like to encourage the President to reconsider his foreign policy
and adopt the foreign policy of Thomas Jefferson, that of “Peace, commerce
and honest friendship with all nations–entangling alliances with none.”
This involves not only “trade agreements” – true free trade requires no
treaty – but also military intervention. There is no Constitutional
justification for having troops stationed in over 130 countries around the
world, nor the two “wars” that are being waged. the troops should be
brought home immediately.

The President talks about a lack of “faith” in the institutions, but i
think it’s a lack of respect. One of the reasons the people don’t trust
the federal government is because neither the Congress, the Judicial or
the Executive has any respect for the Constitution – the document that
established federal authority – or individual liberties. You give respect
to get respect! Why should anyone respect any government if the members of
that government don’t respect their constituents?

All in all, the President wants to continue expanding the size & scope of
the government while decreasing the amount of individual freedoms. I’m
again reminded of the word of Thomas Jefferson, “I would rather be exposed
to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending
too small a degree of it.”

Sincerely,
Darryl W. Perry
2016 candidate for President of the United States of America
http://dwp2016.org
At-Large Representative Boson Tea Party National Committee
http://BostonTea.us
Managing Editor Free Patriot Press
http://FreePatriot-Press.com

12 Comments

  1. Mark Veil February 5, 2010

    Vote left, right or centre. It is all the same. Politicians are owned by the Bilderberg group. They also own and gag all major media.

    The most important questions of our time are: Who are the Bilderberg group. How do they run the entire world. What are their plans for us.

    Billions of people are powerful, if we all locate the answers on the internet, which is not yet totally censored.
    Look up organized stalking and mobbing, too. They want a passive populace and have been destroying those with integrity and leadership qualities aggressively for over twenty years.

    Look up Mark Rich The Hidden Evil. Do not go into denial and say that this cannot be true. It has happened before. Look into it and tell the others. We are 9 billion strong. If they have their way, there will be a slave population of 500, 000.

  2. Thomas L. Knapp January 29, 2010

    NewFederalist,

    My involvement with the BTP is minimal at this time, and I’m in no way its official spokesperson.

    The proceedings of the BTP’s national committee, which strike me as the logical source of “official statements,” take place online.

    Regards,
    Tom Knapp

  3. Rob January 29, 2010

    Thanks for the clarification. What confused me was how Mr. Perry did not sign it as such; he instead put his future campaign first, then his rank in the party and then added his publisher (which serves, in large part, to print Mr. Perry’s books). I’ve never seen a party’s official response where the party is that far in the backseat.

  4. paulie January 29, 2010

    Again, Tom is no longer involved with the BTP, and this article IS the official response, as you can see by following the link in #4 back to the BTP website.

  5. NewFederalist January 29, 2010

    Thanks, Tom. Unless I am mistaken you are involved with the BTP and I figured a response from you would be more or less “official”.

  6. Thomas L. Knapp January 29, 2010

    Sorry, the following should have read:

    If you’re asking what I have to say about Obama’s speech, the answer is “not much, yet.”

  7. Thomas L. Knapp January 29, 2010

    NewFederalist,

    If you’re asking what I have to say, the answer is “not much, yet.”

    I slept through the State of the Union address. I don’t mean I was in front of the TV to watch it and that it bored me; I was in bed asleep and opted not to get up to watch it.

    I responded preemptively to the proposed “freeze” by pointing out that it doesn’t include the juiciest “discretionary” target for cuts (“defense” spending).

    I’ll probably watch and read the speech this weekend, and respond if there’s any substance to it worth responding to.

    Regards,
    Tom Knapp

  8. jim January 29, 2010

    What I’m tired of hearing is “Government Bad, Freedom good, ugga, ugga, ugga”. If you have a real worked out solution, to a real problem, let us all in on it.

  9. NewFederalist January 28, 2010

    What does Tom Knapp have to say?

  10. Thane Eichenauer January 28, 2010

    I’ll just mention that here and elsewhere the article title isn’t necessarily provided by the party being covered.

  11. Rob January 28, 2010

    Is this the BTP’s response? It looks like just Mr. Perry’s personal response. I hope he does better in 2016 than he did when ran for town supervisor in Stalhstown, PA. And when he ran for PA state treasurer. And when he tried to run for Latrobe, PA city council. And when he ran for mayor of Birmingham, AL. And when he ran for US Senate in Alabama.

    Ask Alan Keyes or Harold Stassen….if you want to knock off a permanent and perpetual office holder, you don’t want to send a permanent and perpetual office seeker.

Comments are closed.