Writing in the comments at
Last Free Voice, “NotABarrFan” says:
Jesse [Benton] is a bad boy and now is in a lot of trouble according to Ron Paul’s COS:
Tom Lizardo
Chief of Staff
Phone: 202-225-2831Jennifer Bailey
Scheduler
Phone: 202-225-2831Rachel Mills
Press Secretary
Phone: 202-225-2831
At
Ballot Access News, the same commenter advised readers to call 979-285-0231 for more information.
Ron Paul just now gave a speech about re-opening his Lake Jackson office. Call him now at 979-285-0231 and find out the truth yourself!
Jesse Benton is the Ron Paul spokesman who published the article which is causing all
the
commotion.
Hey, I had homework to do!
Plus, someone called and no one picked up, so we waited until today.
Probably unnecessary at this point. It’s off page one, and any question has long been settled by now.
If any of the other writers here still think it’s important enough, I’ll accept an edit by them.
^Maybe that should be edited into the article.
Don’t call Ron’s office congressional office!
It is against the law for his congressional staffers to discuss who he supports for President or any other aspect of his non-congressional business.
The Campaign for Liberty is his official political (campaign) organization. The people who work there are his political staffers. They speak for him regarding political issues. Here is that number: 612-559-6742.
Stop bothering his congressional staff!
I think this dude should be our first ban for creating fake aliases in order to intentionally spread lies.
I received a facebook reply from Rachel Mills confirming the post.
Hadn’t thought of that. Good job, thanks!
I think the endorsement is pretty obviously genuine.
I received a facebook reply from Rachel Mills confirming the post.
I simply can’t believe that I’m watching four or five people that would otherwise seem to care a great deal about the claims being made here go through some thirty-one, count ‘em, 31 posts making excuses about why they personally just can’t make a phone call to confirm them.
Obviously you didn’t actually read those comments.
I was in a library, and several other people here were at work, so could not all.
Eventually, some people did call, but it was after office hours.
With the confirmation in a CP press release, it now seems even less likely that Jerry is right, but I’ll still call the Ron Paul office in the morning to erase any lingering shadow of doubt.
Ok, I see it now – but I still don’t see it on baldwin08.com .
kkassam,
Email the IPR email address
[email protected]
And just say “Hi Trent, contact me at this email address” and ill get back to you in a few.
johnlowell,
The ones who wont call, wont because we know the truth. The ones doing the urging are busy.
The endorsement is mentioned at the CP site.
Make the call yourself, johnlowell. You don’t own me.
Trent, why no mention yet of the Ron Paul endorsement at the CP site?
Also, what’s your email address? I have a question I’d like to ask you.
I simply can’t believe that I’m watching four or five people that would otherwise seem to care a great deal about the claims being made here go through some thirty-one, count ’em, 31 posts making excuses about why they personally just can’t make a phone call to confirm them. What squirlishness!If you’re so concerned about the truth of the matter, confirm or disconfirm the claim for God’s sake. Either its true or it isn’t, but I’m getting the very distinct impression that a good bit more than the truth is involved for you folks, pride perhaps?
Ross – not necessarily but not necessarily NOT, either.
I’m leaning towards inside job on some level.
Baldwin has suggested that all questions should be answered and that an investigation should be conducted—because all government investigations are inefficient and/or corrupted. This doesnt neccesarily mean that he believes the government is criminally complicit in the attack or knew beforehand–or any of that.
There’s a difference between being for truth and believing that 9/11 was an inside job. That’s not necessarily the truth.
He’s not a theocrat and there’s nothing wrong with being for truth and distrusting government.
Chuck Baldwin puts WAY, WAY too much religion into his politics. Way x 50 at least.
But there’s a difference between that and theocracy.
The truther part would be fan.
The theocrat part, not so much.
Either way; Ron Paul endorsing a theocrat and Truther — not so good.
Yeah, honestly if there was something wrong with the post I think they would of pulled it or deleted it by now.
You are probably correct. But we should still cover all bases.
We already know what Ron Paul says. It’s at his Web site. How much more confirmation do you need?
Audio or video would clinch it.
Yeah, honestly if there was something wrong with the post I think they would of pulled it or deleted it by now.
svf – Send it to paulie.
Yeah, I haven’t worked since the 5th, so I’m running low on toilet paper.
We already know what Ron Paul says. It’s at his Web site. How much more confirmation do you need?
svf – Send it to paulie.
I don’t really care what Bubbu Blanco, or whatever, says. However, I would be interested to know what Tom Lizardo or Rachel Mills says.
The (202) number is just a recording for RP’s congressional office — hours 9am – 6pm Eastern Time.
The (979) number just rings and rings.
Where do I send my consulting bill…?
I called all the numbers, nothing is open.
Personally, I wouldn’t call the office, either.
It might be a bad time:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5xNpgLfq4w
PEACE
Steve
NotABarrFan = Bubbu Blanco aka MDBQC aka Jerry S
OK, where the fuck is Orvetti?
HAHA. I cant call, im also working.
I can’t use my work line for personal calls. Settle for a B- and call it, Ross!
I think Benton might have stolen RP’s thunder; we were supposed to hear a major announcement tomorrow, it’s possible everyone else was blindsided.
So we’re just going to report on it, talk about it, and not call it?
No one SHOULD call, its insultingly stupid.
Anyone actually gonna call? I have homework to do.
Absolutely ridiculous to even consider that Paul would take calls on the matter but NOT remove the article / post a disclaimer.
Nope. Rediculous(TM) assertion.
Why would it be “taking the bait”?
It’s possible, although highly unlikely, that Benton could have exceeded his authority.
Checking out stories is normal practice.
If I was not in a library, I would have called already.
I’m not taking the bait and calling the office. You’d think they could REMOVE the article before now.
What NotABarrFan, alone, is asking us to believe is that Jesse Benton hijacked the C4L Web site and no one else can get the post down.
Not even remotely believable.
Normally I would agree, but he does provide phone numbers. I’m in a library, but if anyone else here can get through, we should post the reply.
What this guy is saying is that Ron Paul’s grandson-in-law wrote a fake blog as Ron Paul and thought he could get away with it?
VERY implausible.
It doesnt appear that anyone but NotABarrFan (who still says we should all vote for Barr) is questioning this.