Press "Enter" to skip to content

New York Again Deprives Libertarian Party of its Own Voting Option in Fusion Congressional Race

Ballot Access News:

This year, the New York Libertarian Party nominated Daniel J. Halloran for U.S. House, 6th district. The party submitted 4,500 signatures to meet a requirement of 3,000 signatures. The petition was not challenged. But because Halloran is also the Republican Party nominee and he is also the Conservative Party nominee, the State Board of Elections will not print a separate box on the ballot so that voters can vote for Halloran as a Libertarian. Instead the Board said it would print the word “Libertarian” within the box on the ballot on either the Conservative line, or the Republican line, whichever he chooses.

This policy is already being challenged in court by the Libertarian Party. The hearing in the similar 2010 case will be December 4, 2012, too late to give any relief to Halloran. That earlier case is Credico v New York State Board of Elections, U.S. District Court, 10-cv-4555. The 2010 case involved the failure of the State Board of Elections to give Randy Credico, candidate for U.S. Senate, a box on the ballot so voters could vote for him as a Libertarian, and an additional box so that voters could vote for him as the nominee of the Anti-Prohibition Party. Both parties had their own lines on the ballot.

The state policy creates a confusing ballot. The Libertarian Party has its own party column on the ballot, and the ballot would be far less confusing if the Board simply printed Halloran’s name in the Libertarian Party column. Instead, there is a blank space for U.S. House in the Libertarian column, yet voters will see the word “Libertarian” in either the Republican column or the Conservative column. And voters will lose the ability to signal that they support Halloran as a Libertarian; they will be forced to cast a vote that will be credited either to the Republican Party or the Conservative Party, depending on which line Halloran chooses for the Libertarian label. Thanks to Mark Axinn for this news.

Mark Axinn on State Chairs list:

Fellow Libertarians:

Although he timely submitted over 4500 unchallenged petition signatures for the Libertarian line in the 6th CD, Dan Halloran has been advised that BOE intends to list his name only on the Republican and Conservative lines in clear violation of its own rules. Such determination is particularly egregious as the Libertarian Party has a line on the ballot in Dan’s (and every other) Congressional District, but BOE advises that it will leave the box for Congress blank in the LBT column notwithstanding Dan’s submission of requisite signatures to qualify therefor.

Dan’s campaign manager, who is also an attorney, plans to file suit in the US District Court, EDNY, to challenge this decision by BOE. If he does, I will join in the action as a party plaintiff similar to the pending action filed two years ago on behalf of Libertarian and APP Senate candidate Randy Credico.

This lunacy has to stop. BOE comes out with absurdly difficult rules WHICH WE FOLLOW and then they still fail to list our candidates as their own law requires.

Mark Axinn
Chair, LPNY

2 Comments

  1. Thomas L. Knapp October 30, 2012

    Marc @ 2,

    Yes, you are reading the rule correctly.

    The rule has been ignored for years when it comes to “fusion” candidacies.

    The best course would be for the national convention to modify the bylaws so as to allow for such “fusion” endorsements.”

    The second best course would be for the LNC to enforce the rule until the best course is followed.

    The worst course is for the LNC to ignore the rule when it produces results the LNC doesn’t like.

    That last course is the course the LNC tends to follow on any and all issues.

  2. Marc Allan Feldman October 30, 2012

    I don’t understand.

    According to LP bylaws
    “No affiliate party shall endorse any candidate who is a member of another party for public office in any partisan election”

    If Halloran is running as a Republican, shouldn’t this disqualify him from running as a Libertarian?

Comments are closed.