“The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is the servant to the lender.” Proverbs 22:7
By Riley J. Hood-State Chairman
It is too bitter to contemplate; but there are a majority of the people who are advocating for the preservation of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and the rest of the Great Society “Safety Net.” Perhaps they are tired of getting shocked every time they “touch the third rail of politics.” The point that must be made is that these systems, like all things socialist, are a perpetual debt that can never be paid. Take a look at these examples:
•Public School funding comes from Property taxes. You can never pay that bill off, as long as this is left in place. $5,000 a year in payments for a home you supposedly own. The City uses those taxes for it’s corrupt school system, as long as you advocate for Public schools, you advocate for property taxes and perpetual debt.
•Social Security Insurance taxes come out of every check you make. What started out as 1% of your paycheck is now 6.2% and if not phased out will increase. There are people who never worked, who get “upgraded” from welfare to SSI, so they can receive more money per month. Some people pretend they are mentally ill, so they can, on purpose, collect a “crazy check.” Not only is this tax socialistic, it is un-biblical, “…for children ought not lay up for the parents, but parents for the children.” II Corinthians 12:14 Under SSI, all the children have to pay for all the “parents.”
•Medicare D was put in place under GW Bush. Subsidized prescriptions for the elderly. According to most studies, 80% of all prescriptions under this program aren’t for physical illness, but are psychiatric drugs. So we have to pay a perpetual debt for people who are high on Zoloft; Zannax, and Prozac. That couples neatly with the above mentioned SSI payments, because folks on “medicine” usually can’t hold down a job, because their ability to concentrate is gone. Medicare D has created a class of Geriatric Delinquents. Now we have Obama-care, with all its costs and corruption.
The examples I have cited aren’t just inner city people. When I was attending an EV Free Church, several of the elderly ladies in that Sunday Morning Bible study said they were on Methadone. Earlier than that, a lady at a Wednesday night Bible study gave a “testimony” that she was “blessed” by having her AFDC upgraded to SSI. She regularly states she “lives by faith and blessing, not works.” I would say she understands neither, but is content to badmouth the people who pay her way. What about these people? CPoW will cut out all this nonsense; they will have to rely on private charity, not public taxation. The worst thing that will happen is that these adults will actually have to grow up.
Charity begins at home, and can also be found at your local church. Civil Government can only “redistribute wealth,” which is theft. The working man shouldn’t have a quarter off his check snatched from him. He shouldn’t have to rent his job from government, (Income Tax) so he can then pay rent on his home (Property Tax). CPoW means to end all federal direct taxation, and I would say eliminating every form of direct taxation is a laudable goal.
The people playing the system aren’t the first priority here. The people administering the system aren’t the first priority either. The first priority is the people who have to pay for all this nonsense in high taxes and high prices. We agree with Thomas Jefferson who stated, “To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty or profusion and servitude.” When the Government runs out of people’s money to steal, then it will begin rationing and liquidating. Or like European Nations, America will lose its independence. To answer Thomas Jefferson, CPoW promotes economy and liberty.
Thanks to Cody Quirk for the link.
But what other kind of link would you expect from a troll?
Here is the correct link from above:
http://www.gutsense.org/constipation/anal_sex.html
Wow, what a quack! He seems to be totally unaware of the body’s ability to adapt. I wonder how he accounts for pregnancy?
The fact is that anal sex is practiced by millions of people, and the vast majority of them suffer no long-term negative effects from it. Hmm, just like vaginal sex… Imagine that!
Which tradition would that be?
Traditional marriages were arranged, polygamous, incestuous, coerced, and often involved people too young to be allowed to marry today, so what’s with the argument from tradition?
No-fault divorce and, in some states, interracial marriage were banned as recently as the 1970s and 1960s respectively. How old of a tradition are we talking about?
Any questions?
God bless you Grundmann. You are correct. I’m glad you speak truth to these illiterate heathens who have obviously never read the good book. This book is looking out for your health in this case, as proven by the good doctor in the link above. Follow it.
You’ve brought up some interesting points to consider Josh, though also don’t forget the 14th Amendment, which makes sure that states can’t just up and infringe on our own Constitutional Rights- just sayin’.
Plus while I might be a social conservative that does want to protect & maintain traditional marriage, I do so in a practical & constitutional manner without taking the highly counterproductive and irrational approach of Donald (Dumb) Grundmann.
Your rebuttal, Mr. Grundmann, shows your lack of basic understanding of our constitution. Why can states pass such laws when the Constitution never mentions them? That can be answered by our 10th amendment, which reads, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” But please sir, please continue to ramble aimlessly and spouting off as many insults as your deranged mind can conjure up .
“The Constitution also says nothing about … children being molested”
Neither does the Bible.
“cannibalism”
Now I’m hungry for some fava beans and a nice chianti.
“NORMAL people”
You mean white? I bet you mean white.
“myself and Riley will oppose pervert marriage because we know that it will destroy the culture and shatter countless lives”
And provoke hurricanes, right? Damn, if only we used our superpowers for good!
“we now switch to total reliance on government instead of God”
One omnipotent master is as evil as the other. I seek freedom, not enslavement by god or government. If you choose to be a slave to a god that doesn’t exist and a book as flawed as any of the Twilight books, that’s your business, but don’t impose it on me.
—
This rebuttal brought to you by the Homosexual/Sodomy Movement Army of Death™.
1) Fauver – The Constitution also says nothing about – A) murder, B) rape, C) children being molested, D) perverts having sex with animals ( and then teaching that to children as they are working toward doing ), E) arson, f) cannibalism,… and on and on. Why can the government – national, state, or any other – then impose restrictions on any of these actions or any others not mentioned in the Constitution? Why not allow everyone to follow the example of Paulie and endorse anything?
Answer – ( partial ) – Societal norms. NORMAL people know that they, and especially ( at least ) their children, must be protected from the actions of others. But of course we are more than willing to change those norms when the religious foundation of both those norms and our nation changes from Christianity to Humanism/Satanism. The end result is that ” old-timers ” like myself and Riley will oppose pervert marriage because we know that it will destroy the culture and shatter countless lives while newly produced drones such as yourself will attack us and justify your own passivity to the monstrous cultural attack which our nation is now enduring. All to, as with Quirk, to protect your precious ” image;” i.e.; go along to get along.
2) Before the expansion of the leviathan/colossus state ” welfare ” was a matter for church and family to solve. With the rise of the anti-Christian and Satanic/Humanist state based on Darwinian ” survival-of-the-fittest ” we now switch to total reliance on government instead of God with the automatic result of never-ending and ever deepening permanent slavery for the masses. But of course Riley and I will be attacked for opposing such slavery. We are accused of attacking the poor when in fact we endeavor to bring them a freedom and prosperity which they have never known and never will know if they follow defenders of the state/Plantation Masters such as Quirk and yourself.
P.S. – The rest of the comments after yours show the pathetic state of their writers. Social Engineering has truly produced a bumper crop of shattered former humans who can be counted on to not lift a finger to oppose the Plantation Masters of our nation.
CLC…been there done that. 🙂
Riley the dingus can give me analingus!
Grundmann the dingus can also give me analingus!
You can personally follow whatever you want. What you try to make government law is a whole different matter. People have the right to take whatever risks they want as long as they take responsibility for the consequences and government should have no right to interfere in any activities between consenting adults.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbGkxcY7YFU
Here is the correct link from above:
http://www.gutsense.org/constipation/anal_sex.html
http://www.gutsense.org/constipation/anal_sex.hmml
Paulie, I don’t care what you or your friends do to each others’ anuses. But the bible’s prohibition makes good sense that I personally follow for public health purposes.
Your aesthetic sensibilities about sex don’t belong in government policy and more than your aesthetic sensibilities about what books, movies or music you like or do not like.
Everyone has the propensity. There’s no such thing as being gay. It only depends on exposure. I was exposed to female with male organs on the Howard Stern show. I saw a side of man I hadn’t considered. It was aesthetically pleasing but I rejected it for public health purposes. Women have more aesthetically pleasing bodies. Marianne Williamson is good example of that.
DeNyle is not just a porno star from Colorado.
How did you know I sneezed?
Nonesense. None of the hundreds of women I have penetrated anally has ever had a problem with being unable to take a dump because of it. None of the thousands of women and gay and bi men I have known in a non-biblical sense has ever reported having any such problem either. Sounds like either a myth or an extremely rare condition. Maybe you should stop believing and passing along BS you find at reich wing propaganda sites just to be an annoying troll..
Speaking for myself, I am not in any closet. Please do not use that slur about me. God bless.
CLC/Grundmann/Hood
What’s it like living in a closet with a see through glass door? Oh wait, I see…
God bless you Paulie, but engaging in penetration of the anus, fun as it may seem, will cause one to be unable to dump. Good sense for the bible and society to ban it; public health considerations.
God bless Riley Hood and Don Gruntmann. Nothing wrong with oral. It’s a friendly activity. Okay and healthy as long as anus not penetrated.
Another booty bump then take a dump while getting pumped…
…smoke another rock then smoke some more cock..
Maybe they take turns. Snort another line then some more 69…
I think the better question is who’s the top and who’s the bottom?
Sounds like a cool name for a band.
BTW, is there even a remote chance Grundmann and Riley are not hooking up for secret gay sex at CP conventions (or at least fantasizing about it)?
I’m a proud member of the Homosexual/Sodomy Movement Army of Death.
OOOH! My favorite Pharisee has come back to play! Lets get to the bottom of this issue shall we? We have people like Riley and Grundmann who claim to be both Christians and Constitutionalists but are, if we get to the bottom of the matter, not much of either. Lets look at it, shall we?
On the matter of the Constitution they throw out the pieces that don’t line up with their views on certain social matters. For instance, the Constitution Party opposes both gay marriage and the decriminalization of drugs. Where in the Constitution was the Federal Government given the authority to determine what marriage is and what WE THE PEOPLE can and cannot ingest into our bodies? Don’t worry guys, I’ll wait for you guys to quote an article, section, line.
So on the matter of social issues what do they want to do? They want to legislate Biblical morality. They are of the opinion, and rightfully so I would add, that homosexuality is a sin. Does that, however, mean it should be the law of our land? I don’t think so. But lets look at this matter seriously shall we? If we are going to legislate biblical moralit, which is what these people seem to want, then their opinion on these social programs is wrong. What does the Bible say on this matter?
“Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’ Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’ “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’ (Many believers like to stop this story here, because it’s very feel good. Oh I gave, I’m a good person. Or, maybe they believe that doing such works is voluntary for believers, but the passage does go on in fact.)
“Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.” “They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’ “He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’ “Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.” (Matthew 25:31-46)
“There will always be poor people in the land. Therefore I command you to be openhanded toward your brothers and toward the poor and needy in your land.” (Deuteronomy 15:11)
“Defend the cause of the weak and fatherless; maintain the rights of the poor and oppressed. Rescue the weak and needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked.” (Psalms 82:3-4.)
“Do not oppress the widow or the fatherless, the alien or the poor. In your hearts do not think evil of each other.” (Zechariah 7:10.)
“He who oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker, but whoever is kind to the needy honors God.” (Proverbs 14:31).
“If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered.” (Proverbs 21:13.)
“The righteous care about justice for the poor, but the wicked have no such concern.” (Proverbs 29:7.)
“He defended the cause of the poor and needy, and so all went well. Is that not what it means to know me?” declares the LORD.” (Jeremiah 22:16)
So what we have here is a situation where, much like they do with the Constitution, these people want to legislate only the parts they like. They can find one maybe two scriptures where the Bible says that homosexuality is a sin, and they want to quickly rush to make it illegal, but they don’t like social welfare programs so they want them done away with, despite the Bible being quite clear on this matter.
I say all that to say this, if we are going to legislate the Bible, then let us legislate all of it. Let us apply this logic of legislating the Bible across the board. Lets not just legislate the parts that we find agreeable, but let us legislate all of it. Especially the parts that serve a most practical purpose.
Quirk – Riley has done nothing to contribute to the decline of the CP. It is only your CLAIM that he has done so as he combats the pathetic and staggering weakness of yourself and your friends. The CP actually had a fantastic addition by subtraction when your foolness and betrayal was exposed. Your continuing pathetic weakness is shown by your continued trumpeting of my supposed threat of violence against you; an utterly stupid and nitwit claim which only an utterly stupid you could promote both then and now as a distraction to both your aspiring, and now demolished, betrayal and your ego preening which still takes first place in your existence. Thankfully Riley is fighting on so many issues, and I with him, which a fool like you dare not address because of your still perpetual indulgence with your precious ” image.” We are both standing for truth and, in complete opposition to yourself and your friends, don’t give a damn about ” image;” especially because weak cowards such as yourself will always both complain against and smear true fighters such as Riley and myself and grovel before true evil such as the so-called ” LGBT Movement ” ( actually the Homosexual/Sodomy Movement ). Your ” image ” and that of any so-called ” conservative Christian ” who follows your groveling path is that of a pathetic piece of dirt which is run over by the tanks of the Homosexual/Sodomy Movement Army of Death. Protect your precious image. That will ALWAYS be the primary purpose of your existence. Riley and I will continue to carry the battle to the enemies of both our nation and humanity as a whole.
I responded because I have grown tired of your perpetual attacks against a good, and – totally unlike you – REAL, man like Riley and your attacks against the CP. Whatever possible values your new party has they can now ” enjoy ” you as a millstone around their neck. The CP lost an aspiring backstabber when you left. Good riddance.
This guy needs a new hairdo.
Finally showing your face again around here, eh?
So you think a man with a distorted view of Christianity that bears false witness towards others beliefs (including Mormons) and who’s approach is help contributing to the decline of his political party is a “true Christian”.
But then again, this comes from a man that has made physical threats against me and others, and whose arguments against homosexuality actually make the LGBT cause look good and even furthers it; just like the WBC’s protests have further hurt the image of conservative Christians opposing Gay Marriage, and you are doing the same thing here as well.
Riley Hood has written an excellent short summation of the problem and, as usual, the pseudo Christian Quirk attacks him both for simply being a prominent member of the Constitution Party and because Quirk has no concept of the progressive expansion of the problem nor its origins via, among many other reasons, the decimation of our currency which has enslaved the nation.
Riley presented a basic formation of why those are welfare are actually slaves. They, as slaves, are indeed ” part of the problem ” as are all who feed off of the system, strive for its continuance and expansion, and ( especially ) don’t know what the hell they are talking about when they attack others such as Riley who are working to truly solve the problem. The progressive impoverishment of the populace cannot be solved until the economic chains upon the nation, many of them fashioned and put in place by the citizens themselves, are confronted and stopped.
I will present Riley any day of the week as an example of a true Christian who works to establish the Biblical principles upon which our nation was both founded and flourished before its unfortunate demise under a tidal wave of anti-Christian attacks and mutants inclusive of those who will sacrifice their fellows to slavery while working instead for their own glorification.
Looks like to Bro Perm, people on welfare (even if they are Christian), are evil and part of the problem.
Yeah, this guy is a bad excuse of a Christian, period.