Press "Enter" to skip to content

Chuck Baldwin: Democrats Want Votes; Republicans Want Cheap Labor…But What Do Globalists Want?

Posted by 2008 Constitution Party Presidential candidate Chuck Baldwin at ChuckBaldwinLive.com:

The invasion of illegal aliens across our southern border is no extemporaneous event. It is a cold, calculated, and cunning attempt to fundamentally change America. The Obama Administration has sent a loud and clear signal to our neighbors to the south that illegals are welcome, that they won’t be sent home, and that they will be provided either real or de facto amnesty–especially if those illegals are minors. The result is a torrent of illegals pouring over the border into the United States. These illegals are being housed, fed, given medical care, and are being transported to destinations throughout the U.S. Few are being deported. Several military installations have been essentially turned into daycare centers and nurseries, and according to several published reports, up to 70% of U.S. Border Patrol personnel are now being assigned to administrative duties in an attempt to process the hundreds of thousands of illegals that have amassed at the border.

 

Giving amnesty to illegal aliens is a long time goal of both Democrats and Republicans in Washington, D.C. U.S. Congressman Kerry Bentivolio (R-Mich) stated it succinctly: “Democrats want the votes, and the Republicans want the cheap labor.”

 

The only people opposing granting amnesty to illegals in Washington, D.C., are the Tea Party Republicans. And had it not been for the defeat of Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (a major proponent of amnesty) by Tea Party Republicans in Virginia a few weeks ago, there is absolutely no question that the GOP-led House and Democrat-led Senate would have collaborated on, and passed, an amnesty bill this summer. But with the defeat of Cantor, scores of GOP House members are extremely skittish about supporting amnesty–especially with the fall elections just around the corner.

 

Of course, the pro-amnesty media and their fellow-travelers in the Congress are pitching the idea that all of these illegal immigrant children are “refugees” escaping war-torn conditions in Central America. This plays well on the heartstrings of a compassionate American citizenry–just as it is designed to do. Even pseudo-conservatives such as Glenn Beck and Joe Scarborough are trying to score ratings points by getting into the “help the children” act by stunts like sending soccer balls and teddy bears to the border. But the facts just don’t support the hype.

 

Think about it: Does anyone really believe those youngsters traveled hundreds of miles on their own? Get real! They were led, fed, and supervised all the way to the border. Someone paid those coyotes (human smugglers) hundreds or even thousands of dollars to take those young people to the border. Make no mistake about it: This is a premeditated strategy of insurgents.

 

The only veteran of both the Vietnam and Iraq wars serving in Congress, Rep. Bentivolio took a fact-finding trip to Central America to assess conditions there. The congressman told World Net Daily that “conditions in Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador are certainly not great and there is much hardship, but they are not war zones.” In fact, the congressman noted that the conditions of the Central American countries are not dissimilar from many of the inner city neighborhoods of big U.S. cities.

 

Congressman Bentivolio also said that solving the illegal immigration problem is not complex: “If we had secure borders, we wouldn’t have this problem. We need to send a strong message that, if you want to come to America, do it legally, and get in line.”

 

See the WND report here:

 

Congressman Exposes Truth Behind Illegal Kids

 

Exactly! “Do it legally, and get it line.” That is the way it’s been historically done. The next time you hear someone say America is “a nation of immigrants,” realize that is not strictly true. America is a nation of LEGAL immigrants.

 

But neither Republican nor Democrat presidential administrations (Bush I, Clinton, Bush II, Obama) have done diddly-squat to protect America’s southern border. Does anyone not find it interesting that the federal government will send U.S. military forces to the Middle East with assignments that include protecting and securing the borders of those countries but will not protect the borders of the United States?

 

Of course, if the federal government was not underwriting illegal immigration with all kinds of government services, illegals would not even have that much incentive to enter the country in the first place. First, the federal government provides every incentive for illegals to sneak into the country via copious government-subsidized benefits, then it refuses to remotely secure the border, and then it refuses to deport them after they have arrived: DUH! I wonder why we have an illegal alien problem!

 

Beyond that, the federal government has released thousands of illegals from U.S. jails and prisons who have committed the most heinous crimes within this country. At the same time, it has not even attempted to arrest the influx of hundreds of thousands of violent illegals.

 

According to Texas State Senator Dan Patrick, there are at least 100,000 illegal immigrant gang members in the State of Texas alone. Breitbart.com covered the story:

 

“On Monday's The Laura Ingraham Show, Patrick, who is also the Republican candidate for lieutenant governor, said from 2008 to 2012, 143,000 illegal immigrant criminals were arrested and jailed in Texas. He said these were ‘hardened criminals, gang members, and other criminals that we identified as being in Texas illegally.’

 

"‘We charged them with 447,000 crimes, a half-million crimes in four years, just in Texas, including over 5,000 rapes and 2,000 murders,’ Patrick said. ‘We estimate we have 100,000 gang members here illegally.’"

 

Patrick also noted that only between one in five or one in ten illegals are actually apprehended. So, do the math.

 

See the report at:

 

Texas State Senator: 100,000 Illegal Immigrant Gang Members In State

 

If we know there are at least that many violent criminals coming across the border, how many potential terrorists must we assume have also come into the United States through this porous, unprotected southern border? The prospect is absolutely frightening!

 

In addition, the unchecked stream of illegals from Mexico and Central America is also taking a toll upon the health of everyone involved in this debacle. Border Patrol agents are coming down with diseases. There are reports of contagious diseases spreading rapidly.

 

ABC 15 TV (Phoenix, Arizona) recently gave a report regarding the concern many people have about the spread of contagious diseases being brought into the country by illegals from the third-world countries below the United States. Health workers are already seeing scabies, chicken pox, MRSA staph infections, and other diseases.

 

A quick note on the MRSA disease: MRSA is considered to be one of the 18 microbes listed by the CDC as a multidrug resistant microbe or “superbug.” You should Google up that disease and see what our children in the public schools are going to be subjected to when all of these illegals get farmed out to the schools of America’s heartland.

 

And, interestingly enough, the DHS has prohibited health care providers from talking to the media. I wonder why?

 

See the ABC report here:

 

Undocumented Immigrants Bringing Diseases Across Border?

 

Plus, the ABC report above does not even touch on the spread of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) that are being reported as being rampant among the tens of thousands of illegals on the border.

 

And, yes, America’s schoolchildren (and the rest of the U.S. citizenry) will certainly be subjected to the health risks described above. Listen to this:

 

“The U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee approved a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 that includes $5.508 billion for Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations. Included in that amount is more than $87 million for the transportation of illegal immigrants–most often via plane–from the U.S.-Mexico border to federal facilities around the nation.

 

“The FY 2015 bill summary states that the federal government will provide ‘$87.6 million above the request for the transportation of unaccompanied immigrant children–often via commercial or charter aircraft–from DHS custody to the legally required shelters operated by the Office of Refugee Resettlement within Department of Health and Human Services.’

 

“A DHS request for ‘escort services for unaccompanied alien children,’ posted online in January, claimed that 50 percent of transported foreign minors are brought to interior U.S. cities via commercial planes. The others are transported via local ground transport and ICE charter air crafts.”

 

See the report here:

 

Budget To Transport Illegals Across USA Approaches $100M

 

So, the people of the United States must be subjected to all of the above because “Democrats want the votes, and the Republicans want the cheap labor.” But what do the globalists want? The globalists are the real power behind both the Democrat and Republican parties in Washington, D.C. Nothing substantial happens in politics or business without their approbation. So, what do they want to get out of a chaotic border crisis?

 

Remember, the goal of globalists is the dismantlement of nationhood. They envision a global government complete with a global economy and global military. The United States is the biggest hindrance to this objective. America, alone, has the freedom-oriented history, heritage, culture, laws, arms, attitude, etc., that stands as a huge impediment to the globalists’ agenda. This is in spite of the fact that every presidential administration since Ronald Reagan, most congresses, and the national media have been dominated by globalists.

 

Remember, too, that the two main assets assisting the cause of globalism are perpetual war abroad and the rise of a Police State domestically. In fact, the latter is dependent upon the former. Perpetual war, conflict, crisis, upheaval, etc., is the impetus for the rise of the Super State, (aka the Police State), which is ostensibly designed to “protect” the people from the crisis. It is no exaggeration to say that most of the crises in the post-World War II world have been manufactured crises for the purposes of creating the Super State. The illegal immigration crisis is no exception.

 

The influx of millions of illegals–many of whom are violent criminals, murderous gang members, potential terrorists, disease-carriers, and people from third-world, socialist countries who have absolutely no understanding of, or appreciation for, constitutional law, Natural Law, republican government, etc.–will most definitely turn American cities into war zones. And that’s exactly what globalists want. They want every city in America to look like Chicago.

 

Do you know that there have been more murders in Chicago than in all of the mass-killings throughout the United States combined? See AWR Hawkins’ report:

 

Report: Far More People Killed In Chicago Than In All Mass Shootings Combined

 

And what is the City of Chicago but a Police State with barely any rights of self-defense. My friends, that is what the globalists have planned for your city. And illegal immigration is the vehicle that is designed to bring it to pass.

 

Yes, “Democrats want the votes, and the Republicans want the cheap labor,” but the globalists want a national crisis that will further facilitate turning America into a giant Police State. But, I suppose the biggest question is what do the American people want? We’ll soon see.

12 Comments

  1. paulie July 25, 2014

    Besides which, right after that we would be taken over by other countries and denazified, kind of how WF’s ideal society (Germany in the early 1940s) was.

  2. Jed Ziggler July 25, 2014

    “I’d love to tell you what should really be done with them, but there’s about zero chance it would get past the ziocommunist thought censors of IPR!”

    What’s the point? You’d just deny it ever happened, anyway.

  3. paulie July 25, 2014

    Ethnic cleansing of millions of immigrants is in most cases just a cheap and worthless campaign promise to rile up ignorant rubes and another convenient excuse for the ever expanding domestic police state apparatus. Those who seriously advocate it will never get in power. There is no way that any regime will ever get to power and deport millions of people, some of whom have lived in the US practically their whole lives, others who have married and had children with native born Americans, and so on. Nor will they ever effectively police the border either. As long as there is demand for banned goods and cheap labor, both contraband and un-government approved humans will find their way across the borders one way or another. Wolf whistles to the nativist and frequently racist anti-immigrant far right are effective at shearing them of their money and volunteer time, but little else, besides giving aid and comfort to the Department of Heimland Security.

  4. White Forever July 25, 2014

    Excellent article by Chuck Baldwin and right on the money. He doesn’t go far enough though. If we deport the invaders, what’s to stop them from just coming back? I’d love to tell you what should really be done with them, but there’s about zero chance it would get past the ziocommunist thought censors of IPR!

  5. paulie July 24, 2014

    The only legitimate question is whose property is it? Unless all property within the borders the regime claims is legitimately at least in part the regime’s property, it has no right to claim trespass and is itself the trespasser when it tells employers who they can and can’t hire, landlords who they can and can’t rent to, and so on.

    But, if we say that the state is the legitimate owner or part-owner of all property within the borders it claims, it can collect rent (taxes), pass any regulations it wants (just as you could in your own home or private business) and tell anyone it wishes to leave at any time – even native born citizens. The logic by which regime border control is legitimate also dictates an unlimited government in all other aspects.

    As a practical matter any government that is big enough to make anything like a real attempt at border control isn’t going to stop with just doing that, it will flex its muscles in many other parts of everyone’s lives that it gets its paws on. Even in matters that conservatives such as Baldwin agree with libertarians that the regime should keep out of.

  6. paulie July 24, 2014

    http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2014/07/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-closed-borders-libertarian/

    From that article:

    Consider that libertarians oppose laws restricting people’s ability to do things like consume drugs and sugary beverages, gamble their savings on professional sports, ride motorcycles without helmets, etc. But note that a major argument made on behalf of supporting these laws is that they prevent an increase in the consumption of state-provided benefits. People who ruin their health and their finances are more likely to avail themselves of state assistance. Still, libertarians reject these laws—not just in principle, but here and now.

    I see no reason to treat free immigration differently. (Indeed, if anything, we have far stronger reason to permit free immigration because it would produce significantly greater gains in human well-being than, say, helmetless motorcycle riding.) Now, you might zig where I zag: you could support ending the drug war, legalizing gambling and helmetless motorcycle riding, etc. only in principle but not in practice. This view reduces civil and economic libertarianism to a project without much real-world import. And maybe this is the view you take (although I doubt it). But if you don’t, then you should support people’s right to immigrate in the real world at least as strongly as you support their right to drive a car without wearing a seatbelt.

  7. paulie July 24, 2014

    Agreed completely with everything Jed said. Also:

    http://reason.com/archives/2014/07/21/the-truth-about-violence-in-chicago

    Chicagoans could be forgiven for envying the residents of Indianapolis.

    Imagine living in a place where homicides have been reduced by more than half in the past two decades, where robberies are less common than they’ve been in nearly half a century, where car theft is at levels not seen since “The Dick Van Dyke Show” was still in production.

    Actually, that’s where Chicagoans do live. I was only pretending to talk about Indianapolis. Those developments have all occurred right here.

    Right now, the city is getting national as well as local attention for outbreaks of bloodshed, which reinforce its reputation as the murder capital of America. In terms of total homicides, it may be. But that figure fails to account for population.

    In the overall rate of violent crime, Chicago ranks 19th—slightly worse than Minneapolis and better than Kansas City, Indianapolis, and Nashville. It has half as much violent crime, per capita, as Detroit or Oakland, California.

    Even when it comes to homicide, Chicago is enjoying, relatively speaking, a golden age. In 1992, it had 943 murders—2.6 per day. Last year, it had 415—1.1 per day. Two decades ago, such progress was the stuff of dreams.

    In 2013, the murder rate (homicides per 100,000 residents) was the lowest it had been since Lyndon Johnson was in the White House. So far, the homicide total for 2014 is 206, a bit below last year’s pace.

  8. Jed Ziggler July 24, 2014

    First off, this crap about immigrating legally displays complete ignorance of what our immigration laws actually are, for most it is literally impossible to immigrate legally. For skilled workers, the wait to finally be granted citizenship & entrance to this country is upwards of thirty years, for unskilled workers, it’s almost completely impossible: most die on the waiting list, it takes that long. We don’t have legal immigration in this country, mostly because of assholes like this.

    Second, to profess to be a Christian and then refer to human beings in such a way, as illegals, votes, labor, etc. is despicable and shameful. That goes for Baldwin and Bentivolio. They’re people, they have the same rights you do, Mr. Baldwin, including the right to immigrate and travel. Those rights weren’t given to them by a government or a Constitution, they were given to them by God. No law of the United States can supersede God’s law, or if you’re not religious, nature’s law.

    The United States of America has no right to keep anyone from crossing its borders, unless it can be proved said person poses a clear threat to national security, such as known criminals, terrorists, or people with extremely contagious diseases. The border between Texas and Mexico should not be treated substantially differently from the border between Texas and New Mexico.

    The rights to live, speak, immigrate, trade, travel, worship, congregate, bear arms, pursue happiness, and all others are not American rights, they are natural human rights, and when government takes them away, it is a crime against humanity. Shame on you, Mr. Baldwin.

  9. paulie July 24, 2014

    That’s a kind way to put it.

Comments are closed.