By Bryan Ellis at the PSL’s Liberation News:

In Florida, anti-transgender bill 583, known by many as the “bathroom bill,” recently made its way out of the House Civil Rights Subcommittee with a 9-to-4 vote. Like bills in Kentucky and Texas, the proposed law would make it illegal for transgender people to use public facilities that correspond with their gender if it is different from the one assigned to them at birth.
The bill has sparked several protests and been met with vocal resistance by the trans community and supporters of human rights. Liberation spoke with several people to hear their thoughts on the bill.
Lauren Brenzel, a 23-year-old living in Sarasota, told Liberation how the bathroom bill is both transphobic and a threat to public safety.
“It’s very thinly veiled transphobia,” said Brenzel. “It’s especially offensive because it’s claiming to be something that protects women when really it’s putting some of the most vulnerable women in an even more vulnerable situation by forcing trans women to use restrooms they don’t identify with. And we know that cis men are particularly likely to commit violence against trans women. So it’s a huge concern for public safety in the state that a bill like this would be passed.”
Brandi Branson of Trans Support Network of West Central Florida told Liberation how the bill, though a serious matter, serves primarily to distract attention from proposed legislation that would offer substantive protection to trans people.
“The ‘bathroom bill’ is pernicious in the sense that it’s really a distraction,” said Brandi. “Yes, it could be lethal, it could be very
difficult. But it’s so draconian in its structure and bigoted in its writing, that there’s no question that it won’t succeed. But it is a distraction, because the real issue is getting the bill passed called the Florida Competitive Workforce Act, which would put our civil rights into Title XII and guarantee us rights equal to anyone else in the state of Florida.
“The Florida Competitive Workforce Act is designed to guarantee the right of transgender people to be free from discrimination at work, being fired, or being harassed on the job, but even more than that, it affects all facets of life. We’re trying to add four words to Title XII: ‘gender identity’ and ‘gender expression.’ And those four words would cover basically the needs of the transgender community and its variants and it would then bring us into a place where we have genuine equality with the rest of Florida.”
Branson sees a long road ahead in the fight for trans equality, but believes the enactment of federal and state protections is achievable.
“In reality we’re going to keep having these kinds of things come up until we get established as a real people. The problem right now is we’re viewed as a non-people by most factions of society, even in the gay and lesbian community, so consequently our rights are very thin at best. Until we get this done, hopefully at the federal level but certainly at the state level, we’re going to continue to have these types of entrapments.”
Dr. Emily Fairchild, Associate Professor of Sociology at New College of Florida, spoke to Liberation about her reaction to HB 583, as well as the nature of sex and gender. Fairchild teaches classes such as Sociology of Gender and the Body, Queer Studies and a number of other gender related courses.
“[The bill] is discriminatory in that it only addresses trans people. I think it’s ignorant in that it references biological definitions of sex that are really problematic given how people actually conceptualize gender and how they live their lives as gendered people. And that’s why the bathroom issue is an issue, because it’s a physical space that’s usually segregated and designated and it’s a reminder of the fact that our society is organized by sex,” said Fairchild.
Fairchild also spoke about the term “trans” and how it underscores how concepts of gender have changed from how many understood them in the recent past.
“A common way that the way the word ‘trans’ is being used right now is to use it with an asterisk. Trans* emphasizes the fact that trans is an umbrella term. It can refer to someone who has actually had what in the past has been named ‘sex change surgery,’ and that might be what folks might see as the most ‘extreme’ form of being trans. It could reference something from having actual complete sex change surgery, to partial, to presenting as a man if you were born as a woman, or presenting as some form of genderqueer, so just challenging what people might expect of you, that might be gender ambiguous, androgynous, expressing both a masculine and a feminine presentation or different presentations on different days, or it might be ambiguous such that your goal is that people cannot necessarily place you. All those identities could be considered trans identities,” said Fairchild.
“Society used to think that there was a direct connection between sex and gender, that when you’re born, you’re labeled a boy or girl and then you grow into a man or woman. And that’s based typically on genitals, although it might be based on hormones or on chromosomes. The problem is,” said Fairchild, “that these all come in different kinds of combinations and they might not all line up perfectly in the way that fits that conventional definition of what a man or woman is. So science has come a long way in
identifying the fact that, actually, sex is a lot harder to define than we used to think. It’s not that easy to categorize someone as male or female. There’s not necessarily this one on one relationship between sex and gender. That’s what trans* makes clear and that’s what sex segregated bathrooms tries to force on us, which just doesn’t really fit with how people are living their lives.”
Liberation also spoke to Milo Bickel, a New College student who is dfab (designated female at birth) trans and genderfluid. Bickel explained that HB 583, based on dangerous myths, threatens to increase an already startling homicide rate against trans people.
“The new law is an act of violence from the state and the deaths that can come from this is blood on the hands of the legislators. The homicide rate against trans people, these numbers made mostly up of trans women of color, is one in 12, and there’s no way those numbers can get any lower if legislation forcing trans people into unsafe situations will [pass.]
“There’s literally never been an instance of a trans person committing an act of violence against a cis person in a restroom, so the narrative of predatory trans people—generally the narrative of the ‘man in the dress’ looking to attack women in their safe space—is completely unsubstantiated, transmisogynistic, and contributes to the deaths of trans women who are attacked by cis people.”
Bickel spoke about the importance of gender neutral restrooms.
“Having access to gender neutral restrooms around my campus has improved my psychological wellbeing and reduced the anxiety and dysphoria that accompanies using a gendered restroom and if I’m presenting masculine saves me the trouble of choosing between the dangers of using a gendered restroom at all.”

It all depends on which facilities you end up in. Accomodations vary quite a bit.
I think most places its only one hot (warm…ish) meal, two cold ones, and a concrete slab with thin pad on top. And that’s if I’m lucky enough to get the “bed”, rather than the floor in the one person cell I share with another inmate.
That’s easy enough to arrange. They’ll even give you three hots and a cot for the privilege.
I like government watching me poop.
Get government out of our wallets, our bedrooms…and our bathrooms…
While Jed may have a valid point (that it sounds like a fun room), frankly I think this will encourage more businesses to duck out and close access to public restrooms altogether.
The flip side of this controversy is that while there should be no regulation of which sex goes in which private-sector bathroom, it is a given that those opposed to the regulation would have little problem with a law that *required* access be given to trans people as they wish. Survey a few trans people in your area if you doubt it.
Freedom of association includes the freedom to not associate — with anyone, at any time, for any reason. Regardless of whether the setting is someone’s personal home, or a business.
As with all things, the only thing that will give both sides (in this case, conservatives traditionalists vs trans people) what they want is protecting their freedom to do what they wish as long as they respect the rights of others to run their businesses however they wish.
These activists are right about one thing: This is all a distraction from the rent-seeking real aim:
“Civil rights” has become a code word for “protected class”. Once in Title XII, the lawsuit lotto will begin and any business that wishes to eschew dealing with any trans individuals will be looted for doing so.
While I certainly do not support bills such as #583, I also do not support any suggestion that any “group” should enjoy “special protection” that isn’t offered to EVERY individual citizen. Nor would I support any “civil rights” law that forces businesses to accommodate anyone or otherwise restricts or penalizes free speech.
The “public accommodation” nonsense Haaaaaaahhhhvvvvaaaaaahhhhdd-miseducated idiot lawyers came up with to make “looting in the name of civil rights” possible needs to be erased completely as the affront to freedom of association it is.
And, like I said above, this isn’t enforceable. It seems that I would have to see the sexual organ of the person next to me in the bathroom, call the police, demand that the offender sit there for 15 minutes waiting for the cops to show up, and then the offender would have to actually sit there and wait to get arrested.
Or, they could put cameras in the bathroom stalls.
It seems like a hateful, despicable, political ploy to me. Nothing gonna come of it except some conservative scumbags talking some s**t for a week or two.
If we stopped acting like there is something wrong with people for choosing to live they way they want to, there wouldn’t be much chance of anyone being assaulted in any restroom.
Why anyone gives a damn about what bathroom people choose to take a dump in is beyond me.
LOL.
Or they could just treat trans girls as girls, since there is a lot higher chances of trans girls being assaulted by cisgendered boys in a boys room vs. trans girls assaulting cisgendered girls in a girls room.
Sounds like a fun room.
…and replace them with mandatory all sex rooms.
“Excuse me, teacher, may I please be excused? I need to go to the all sex room!”
Jill P. – Unfortunately for you and your fellow freaks the majority of the citizens have not yet ” gotten past ” being normal and healthy; although the Homosexual/Sodomy Movement which you support is certainly working on changing that.
To see that our nation has degenerated to the point where self-mutilating psychotics will demand their ” rights ” to use opposite bathrooms is bad enough although I know that worse; far, far, far, worse; is intended as the game plan is to first start with using opposite bathrooms and lead to the ultimate goal, courtesy of feminist theory, of banning mens and womens bathrooms as ” bigoted ” and replace them with mandatory all sex rooms.
The greatest tragedy out of this insanity is just now starting as you freaks work to mentally molest children that there are more than 2 genders. This is not just and simply insanity and psychosis but pure evil – something which you god-forsaken rats will not have the slightest peep of objection to.
That is why this psychotic movement must be subjected to non-stop continual scorn, criticism, ridicule, contempt and counter attack of the highest degree. The citizens are going to stand up and fight back in defense of the children of the nation and drive this freak movement, and its supporters like you, back under the rock that they have crawled out from.
Yes, they are!
Jed and Jill are absolutely right.
Jeez, this really should be an issue we should be way past in this country. It’s amazing the issues people get caught up in.
I agree with Jed that individuals and schools and businesses should deal with it on a case-by-case issue.
It’s no business of the government where you pee, or how businesses choose to label their restrooms. Let individuals work it out themselves.
The freak parade in the picture would be great for target practice!
I can’t imagine how they would enforce this law.