Press "Enter" to skip to content

Samuel Edward Konkin III: History of the Libertarian Movement

SEK III

This was posted to Facebook. The name of the site is Left-Liberty.net

History of the Libertarian Movement

by Samuel Edward Konkin III

Posted on 02/16/2012

BEFORE 1969

Prior to 1969, there was no “organized” Libertarian Movement. In the 1800s, circles formed around Lysander Spooner’s individualist abolitionism in Massachusetts, followed by Benjamin Tucker and his Liberty magazine (not to be confused with the Seattle ‘zine of the 1980s & 1990s) which upheld the black banner of individualist anarchy from 1870s to 1907. In that year, the entire stock of back issues and books were burned and Tucker left America to live obscurely in France until his death in 1939.

The orgy of statism peaked first with World War I and then receded. Randolph Bourne uttered the memorable line, “War is the health of the State” just before his death in 1918 and the Roaring Twenties saw a brief revival of freedom. The two main spokesmen were Albert Jay Nock and his Freeman magazine (where Suzanne LaFollette first came to prominence) from 1920-24, and then H.L. Mencken and his American Mercury in the late 1920s and through the 1930s until the approach of the second statist orgasm, World War II.

Nock’s student, Frank Chodorov, was responsible for the first proto-libertarian student organization in the 1950s, the Intercollegiate Society of Individualists (still around, but now called the Intercollegiate Studies Institute). Murray Rothbard, a political fan of Chodorov (but disagreeing with his Georgist deviation on “The Land Question”), formed the Circle Bastiat in the late 1950s after being purged from William Buckley’s National Review. (Buckley was a fan of Nock himself, and had described himself as a “philosophical anarchist” before anointing himself the avatar of modern American conservatism, having “seen a Dream Walking.”)

Robert LeFevre and Leonard Read, like Rothbard and Chodorov, evolved from the “Old Right” alliance against the ultra-statist New Deal war machine of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Classical liberals (like John T. Flynn) and anarchists and even socialists like Norman Thomas joined in the great America First crusade against U.S. imperialism between 1939 and 1941 with never less than 80% of the people behind them…until Pearl Harbor.

LeFevre had a fling at running for Congress with the likes of Richard Nixon in 1948, but soon realized that one could not build a movement for freedom without first re-informing the American people what freedom was, something they had lost in five decades of non-stop statism. He formed the Freedom School in Colorado and his youthful graduates became the original activists in the student movement. Older people attended Read’s Foundation for Economic Education in upstate New York.

Rothbard was attracted to the growing student movement and actually entered the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) with his small following. He broke with those libertarians still clinging to an alliance with the anti-New-Deal Right by opposing Barry Goldwater in 1964 and beginning publication of Left & Right in 1965. He actively attended New Left meetings, wrote for Ramparts magazine, and even formed tactical alliances at the Freedom & Peace Party conventions with Maoists against old-line socialists.

LeFevre’s students began the Libertarian American in Texas and Liberal Innovator (then just Innovator) in California but, when Kerry Thornley became editor, also pursued a pro-New Left alliance. The Innovator leafletted Goldwater delegates at the 1964 Republican Convention at the San Francisco Cow Palace. Innovator also published the first articles concerning underground market activity which was later to be known as Counter-Economics. Alas, the Innovator contributors went underground just as the Libertarian Movement was about to explode aboveground.

Daniel Rosenthal, Sharon Presley, Tom McGivern and others broke from the Youth for Goldwater campaign to form the Alliance of Libertarian Activists, the first explicitly libertarian activist organization at the end of 1964 at the University of California at Berkeley. Meanwhile, the earlier 1960 Youth for Goldwater which had reformed at Buckley’s Sharon, Connecticut estate continued to attract libertarian students largely unaware of the other groups. The new student group, Young Americans for Freedom, had one libertarian chair, the founder, Bob Schuchman, who rejected the label “Young Conservatives.”

Thus, while the early libertarian activists following Rothbard and LeFevre mostly fought on the side of the New Left, the later and much larger group of hard-core campus activists who sympathized with liberty found themselves on the opposite side in the largest anti-New Left group, YAF, in the summer of 1969.

A WORD ABOUT AYN RAND

Jerome Tuccille’s claim (in his book title and elsewhere) that It Usually Begins with Ayn Rand was not accurate, but was indicative. Tuccille himself joined Rothbard and others in the early pre-St. Louis attempt to create a Libertarian movement out of YAF and SDS chapters, the Radical Libertarian Alliance (RLA). Rand herself opposed independent political activism, always supported Republican candidates (going back to Wendell Willkie) or no one, and strongly rejected any association with libertarianism. She called her followers Students of Objectivism and they operated on campuses independently. (For example, at the University of Wisconsin in 1968-70, around 300 of them were called Committee to Defend Individual Rights, or CDIR.) But it is true that many YAF members were influenced by reading Rand, and chapters in Pennsylvania and Maryland were openly Randist. Don Ernsberger and David Walters of Pennsylvania formed the Libertarian Caucus within YAF with Dana Rohrabacher and Bill Steele of California (LeFevrians). According to David Nolan of Colorado, an earlier Libertarian Caucus was tried at the previous National YAF Convention of 1967.

Another of Rand’s following who contributed to early libertarianism was Jarrett B. Wollstein, who created Students for Rational Individualism and The Rational Individualist magazine. Along with Rothbard’s new Libertarian, which he changed when he found the name was used by an obscure newsletter to Libertarian Forum, and LeFevre’s Rampart Journal, Rational Individualist became the leading libertarian publication until 1971. Also influenced by Rand was Lanny Friedlander, who began a fanzine called Reason in 1968.

Writing for RI and Rampart Journal was anarcho-objectivist Roy Childs. Childs wrote an “Open Letter to Ayn Rand” which obtained no response from her other than the usual purge for questioning her ideology. But its case that objectivism lead naturally to free-market anarchy left unanswered provided a conduit for many conversions to libertarianism by such as philosopher and friend of Childs, George H. Smith.

In 1968, Ayn Rand split with her chief disciple, Nathaniel Branden, who had run her activist organization, Nathaniel Branden Institute or NBI. Ex-objectivists filled the ranks of YAF and SRI.

At the end of 1968, Rothbard attempted a Left-Right Anarchist supper club in New York with anarchocommunist Murray Bookchin which lasted two meetings. Rothbard was joined by the former speechwriter for Barry Goldwater, Karl Hess, in Libertarian Forum and in SDS activism. Hess went so far as to join the Black Panthers; his article in early 1969 in Playboy, “The Death of Politics,” was second only to Robert A. Heinlein’s The Moon is A Harsh Mistress (published serially 1967-68) with its portrayal of a largely successful libertarian revolution on the moon in swelling the ranks of the about-to-be-born libertarian movement.

Finish the article here

14 Comments

  1. Robert Capozzi September 19, 2015

    pf: Actions speak louder than words

    me: In a sense, I of course agree. NAPsters however use the word “principle” more like a hard-and-fast rule, with little room for deviation. After a time, I suspect most non-NAP-ster Ls begin to realize they are considered second-class citizens, and are undermined by the NAPsolutists, who have very little tolerance for deviations from the plumbline.

  2. Dave Terry September 19, 2015

    I earlier wrote: “I am proud to say that I was fortunate enough to be one of the few hundred people who were able to write in John Hospers and Toni Natham on my ballot.”

    I am equally proud to have helped (in a small way) in forcing John Hospers to NOT appear as a speaker in the 2004 Libertarian Convention, here in Portland. You will recall that in 2002,
    Hospers endorsed Bush, rather than the Libertarian candidate; Michael Badnarik

    In 2008, Hospers added insult to injury by endorsing Wayne Allen Root for president, stating
    “He is the perfect Libertarian candidate — fiscally conservative, socially tolerant, strong
    on national defense, and mindful of the many threats to our liberty that we face across
    the globe. He wrote on this with such eloquence and conviction as to convince me that
    there could be no better candidate than he is for the Presidency of the United States in
    2008. As one of the original founders of the Libertarian Party, and the first LP
    Presidential candidate, I believe Wayne is the right man at the right time to bring the
    freedom movement to prominence and eventually, victory.”

    The newest obscenity is, in turn, Root’s glowing endorsement of the ‘Chump named Trump’

  3. paulie September 19, 2015

    Actions speak louder than words.

  4. Robert Capozzi September 18, 2015

    In practice, no, true.

    In theory, the Mighty and Most-Wise (20-something) Founders locked down NAPsolutism into the foundation.

  5. paulie September 18, 2015

    I see no evidence that the LP in practice is nearly that exclusive.

  6. Robert Capozzi September 18, 2015

    Randians, Rothbardians, and Longites.

    Still a pretty tiny subset of lessarchists…

  7. paulie September 18, 2015

    Both myself and people much more in line with Ms. Rand fit comfortably within the LP.

  8. Robert Capozzi September 18, 2015

    pf: There are many different kinds of libertarianism,

    me: But the LP is only really for ONE kind, yes? NAPsolutists, and those Quixotics who challenge the cult of the omnipotent state.

    Other lessarchists get the B, non-voting stock, in a sense.

  9. paulie September 18, 2015

    There are many different kinds of libertarianism, many of which are quite different from Randianism in many ways.

  10. jim September 18, 2015

    Dave Terry, you said:
    “I bring this up because although Jim doesn’t consider himself a ‘Randian’, he was clearly influenced by her ‘Objectivism’ as were MOST of us in the early years of the Libertarian movement.”

    But remember what I said, and more that I will say now: I believe I was first exposed to libertarianism with some literature my (apparently libertarian) uncle David had around his house, in 1975: I was not “convinced”; I didn’t need “convincing”, I knew I was already “there”, and I knew that I had been so for as long as I could remember. At that point, it would be improper to say I was “influenced” by Rand, since I was completely unaware of her works at that time. But I don’t think I ever disagreed with them, years later, to the extent I became aware of them.

    Occasionally I jokingly refer to Randianism as “libertarianism with a personality cult”, and to libertarianism as “Randianism without a personality cult”.

  11. paulie September 18, 2015

    Nevertheless, while I am not a ‘Randian’, I am not at all hostile to her ideas.

    Some of them are OK, but my libertarianism is different from objectivism in a number of significant ways. I’ve read Rand, but long after I was a libertarian, and she was never an influence on me.

  12. Dave Terry September 18, 2015

    Jim wrote; “Nevertheless, while I am not a ‘Randian’, I am not at all hostile to her ideas.”

    I read ‘Atlas Shrugged’ in the earlyl 60’s while in The Army stationed in Japan. It prepared
    me perfectly for YAFF which I joined in college in California and ultimately to become active
    in the Libertarian Party.
    I am proud to say that I was fortunate enough to be one of the few hundred people who were able to write in John Hospers and Toni Natham on my ballot. Later, after I moved to Oregon some 30+ years ago, I was honored to meet and befriend Toni.
    I bring this up because although Jim doesn’t consider himself a ‘Randian’, he was clearly influenced by her ‘Objectivism’ as were MOST of us in the early years of the Libertarian movement. ,

  13. jim September 18, 2015

    I learned I was a libertarian before I’d ever heard of Ayn Rand. (1975). I didn’t read Atlas Shrugged until 2001. (Although I’d heard of it in the late 1970’s) I am aware that Rand didn’t particularly like libertarianism, but I ascribe this to simple resentment of what she probably saw as a “me too” idea. Nevertheless, while I am not a ‘Randian’, I am not at all hostile to her ideas.

  14. Jill Pyeatt Post author | September 18, 2015

    I knew Sam a little, but he passed right around the time I was getting involved in the party. He was an interesting character, and I had no idea he was known for his writings. His son is around my boy’s age, but I never met the young man.

    According to the Wikipedia article, he died in his West LA apartment, but I seem to recall he died in a small town close to where I live (Azusa). I’ll have to ask some of the “old-timers” (as far as the Libertarian Party) Where it happened.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Edward_Konkin_III

Comments are closed.