Press "Enter" to skip to content

Joshua Fauver: Demanding More From the Constitution Party

Joshua Fauver is the vice-chairman of the Clarion Call to Unite Committee (CCTUC), an organiztion seeking to unite all minor right-wing and constitutionalist parties under one banner. He is the volunteer coordinator for Free and Equal Elections Foundation and  is the Southeast Regional Coordinator for Robby Wells’ 2016 independent presidential campaign. Formerly a member of the Constitution Party, Fauver is now running for Louisiana state representative for the 21st district in the 2015 elections. 

 

Demanding More From the Constitution Party

Published June 7th, 2013

by Joshua Fauver

I will confess myself an avid follower of the Independent Political Report. They are without a doubt the most up to date and resourceful source of news in the world of third party & independent politics. One story I’ve been following is that of a certain Riley Hood (State Chairman of the Constitution Part of Wisconsin) Mr. Hood has a blog where he has written many pieces that I as well as many others find to be inflammatory, insensitive, and offensive and impermissible from a man in his position.

I want to share some of the things Mr. Hood has written. In his piece, Marry Two Same Sex Dogs?Riley Hood makes some incredibly offensive and insensitive remarks concerning homosexuals. In this particular piece Mr. Hood writes:

 “To “marry” two men is the equivalent of performing a ceremony, and issuing a license to two same-sex dogs. The same statement goes for lesbians.“

It is one thing to be fundamentally oppose to same sex marriage because of one’s personal religious belief or ideology, but to compare homosexuals to dogs, to suggest the two are in some way synonymous is nothing short of bigotry and offensive. Mr. Hood goes on to write, “Sodomites are already molesting your children…” Does Mr. Hood in all sincerity believe that the molestation of children is only being done by homosexuals? Sodomites are already molesting are children; is Mr. Hood not aware of all the molestation being carried out by heterosexuals? Is Mr. Hood blissfully unaware of the women who are raped by heterosexual men? Those who endure brutal sexual assault by those who are not homosexual. It is both ignorant and unacceptable for Mr. Hood to write such ignorant bigotry while holding the position of State Chairman of the Constitution Party of Wisconsin.

Riley Hood is not content to “bash” those who are homosexual or may support their lifestyle, no no no. He has to verbally “attack” those of a different faith as well. In his piece How About Those Muslim Student Union Alums? he stereotypes all those of the Muslim faith who have been educated in American Universities and been associated with the Muslim Student Union, using a list of 7 former Muslim Student Union Members who became terrorist as his evidence that all Muslims are terrorists. He suggests that in fact all Muslims are inherently evil when he writes: “To educate an evil man, is to empower him to commit greater acts of violence.”  
How absurd! All Muslims are not inherently evil and somehow subhuman or un-American simply because of their faith! Are we as a people really supposed to deny them the same right to education that every other American enjoys simply because of their chosen religion? Because we’ve concluded it is somehow evil? The idea is preposterous! Mr. Hood’s claim that all Muslims are terrorist and are evil human beings is nothing short of religious intolerance and religious discrimination.

Does Riley Hood stop there? No, that would be letting us all off way to easy! He continues in another one of his pieces entitled Stop Worshiping the Elephant God to attack the Republican Party. While attacking another political party is certainly not unheard of, it is the manner in which he chooses to do it that is alarming to me. Mr. Hood decided to compare the Republican Party to the Indian “elephant god” Ganesh when he writes:

 “Most Americans would find this appalling, yet there is an Elephant-god that is worshiped in America today, it is called the Republican Party. It has living icons, who speak the Elephant’s commandments.” 

Has the CP state leadership stooped so low that they take the approach to building the party that includes accusing those who vote for and support another political party are guilty of the sin of idolatry? How ridiculous! I’d hope to, at the very least, see a WWJVF (Who Would Jesus Vote For) campaign before they started condemning people of idolatry.

I’d like to call on the leadership of the Constitution Party (National Chairman Frank Fluckiger, Vice-Chairman Randy Stufflebeam, and the National Committee) to do something about this situation with Wisconsin State Chairman Riley J. Hood.

At the very least I’d like to see a public disavowment of these pieces by the national party.

Article source:

http://iacreview.blogspot.com/2013/06/demanding-more-from-constitution-party.html?view=sidebar

16 Comments

  1. paulie June 9, 2013

    “The crime against nature” I’m most familiar with is nosy people who try to impose their values on other people.

    Eaxctly! Well said.

  2. Mark Seidenberg June 9, 2013

    Paulie

    Sheep are not all kinds of animals. Please explain your posr #3?

  3. Mark Seidenberg June 9, 2013

    To my post 10.

    I stated that the ruling was 6 to 3. That would be
    an error to the underlining ruling of fellatio and
    cunnilingus as a crime. Justice O’Conner ruling
    did not reach that issue on privacy. Her ruling
    was far more limited. So the ruling in LAWRENCE case on this issue was 5 to 4.

  4. Cody Quirk June 9, 2013

    Apparently with Little Red Riley Hood, that’s an understatement, lol

  5. Jill Pyeatt June 8, 2013

    MS @ 10: “The crime against nature” I’m most familiar with is nosy people who try to impose their values on other people.

  6. Mark Seidenberg June 8, 2013

    William Saturn at Post 5

    Lawrence vs. Texas, was a 6 to 3 case before that
    court. It was limited to only 14 states. Judges can and have changed their minds over the years
    from case to case. It only applied to consenting
    adults acting in private. Fellatio and cunnilingus
    are still crimes if its is in public or by non consenting adults or children. With the exception of the State of Rhode Island, sex between humans and animals are crimes in all
    the remaining 49 states and the District of Columbia even if it is in private. The crime against nature between humans and animals
    includes the acts of fellatio and cunnilingus.
    See, ANDREWS vs. VANDUZER, N.Y. Sup. 1814
    and ROSE vs. LOCKE, 423 US 48.

    Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman,
    American Independent Party of California

  7. Krzysztof Lesiak Post author | June 8, 2013

    I’m betting money he’s not. Some people in the CP actually believe that shit.

  8. paulie June 8, 2013

    LOL

    Well, if he is, why would he admit it? The gig is not up yet.

  9. William Saturn June 8, 2013

    Last night, I emailed Mr. Hood and asked whether he is a performance artist as Tom Knapp suggested.

    He has yet to respond.

  10. William Saturn June 8, 2013

    Mr. Fauver would be wise to have someone copy edit his work.

  11. William Saturn June 8, 2013

    @1

    See Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).

  12. Cody Quirk June 8, 2013

    True on animals, albeit for the “pecking order” mainly, IMO.

  13. paulie June 8, 2013

    Just because some wacko(s) in robe(s) spouted some nonsense does not make it true.

    Crime against nature? All kinds of species have homosexual sex.

  14. Cody Quirk June 8, 2013

    What about his other comments, Mark?

  15. Mark Seidenberg June 8, 2013

    I find the statement made by Mr. Hood is true.

    The crime is “BUGGERY” and the acts of
    sex between humans and animals or anal
    sex between men is the same crime against
    nature.

    See the cases of R vs WISEMAN, Fortel Rep. 91,
    and R vs. BOURNE, 36 Cr. App. R. 135.

    Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman,
    American Independent Party of California

Comments are closed.