From Karl Dickey at The Examiner:
The new book “The Clintons’ War on Women, the definitive exposé of Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton”, was released yesterday, October 13, 2015, and is available in bookstores across the country. The book was written by Roger Stone and Robert Morrow. “If Clinton Cash was the essential exposé of the Clintons’ financial crimes, this is the ultimate exposé of their non-financial crimes” said New York Times bestselling author Roger Stone. “This is the sordid true story of serial rape, intimidation, strong arm tactics, physical violence against witnesses, break-ins, coverup, drugs, greed, and ambition.”
The authors map the arc of Bill and Hillary’s crimes and coverups, starting with details about their crimes in Arkansas, as well as Bill Clinton’s time in the White House, Hillary’s tenure as Secretary of State, their time at the Clinton Foundation, and concluding with Hillary’s current campaign for president including the incredible email scandal in which the authors assert she has erased evidence of her crimes.
“Hillary is an advocate for women unless the woman is unlucky enough to be a victim of Bill Clinton’s sexual assault, then they are the target of Hillary’s denigration and terror tactics aimed at silencing them,” said Stone. “While Bill Clinton has abused women physically, Hillary has abused them psychologically.”
…
Roger Stone is a seasoned political operative and pundit. A veteran of nine national presidential campaigns, he served as a senior campaign aide to three Republican presidents before leaving the GOP for the Libertarian Party. He is author of the New York Times bestseller The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ and has written for Fox Opinion, Breitbart News, StoneZone.com, theDaily Caller and the Op-Ed page of the New York Times. A well-known voice in politics for over forty years, Roger Stone often gives insights on behind-the-scenes political agendas on Fox News, CNN, CNBC, and MSNBC. He lives in South Florida and is considering running for U.S. Senate as a Libertarian Party candidate.
What makes you think he is a libertarian?
Roger Stone is one of the few strategically-intelligent libertarians that exists. I don’t always like what he likes, or agree with his strategic view, but at least it’s intelligent.
Stone probably shouldn’t run for U.S. Senate, because winning, though possible, is probably more effort than he wants to put forth.
Instead, if he wants to run for office as a Libertarian, he should run for State Senate and win with an overwhelming percentage of the vote. He should walk door-to-door (as much personally as possible, or with high-quality college libertarian activists) and get around 80% of the vote. He should make a conciliatory statement after winning that he will do his best to respect the individual rights of those who did not vote for him, and those who did not vote for anyone, as they have rights that are equal to those who supported him.
THEN, in two years, he should have built up the Libertarian Party in neighboring districts, and gotten several Libertarians elected to neighboring and overlapping districts in the FL State Senate and State House. One thing they should campaign on is abolishing one of the houses, via the initiative process, like NE did. They should directly replicate this, piggy-backing their initiatives on gambling legalization initiatives, and taking the wind out of anti-gambling religious people using a vigorous property rights argument.
THEN, once he has built up the Libertarian presence in the FL State Senate, IF he comprehends how to win U.S. Senate, he should run for U.S. Senate and win, piggy-backing his run on an overwhelmingly popular single-issue initiative.
The prior is an example of a non-delusional, non-fucking-stupid Libertarian strategy that is consistent with libertarian philosophy. All other strategies (such as the ones the LP is now pursuing) are abjectly stupid, and obviously so.
Of course, big-L Libertarians are self-selecting for delusion, stupidity, and lack of ability to comprehend when they are infiltrated. They are more willfully blind to strategy than the average elector. As such, libertarians are self-selecting to become “controlled opposition.”
I just thought I’d throw this message out there for any well-intentioned, intelligent libertarians. The portion of your psyche that rebels against this message is the portion that ensures libertarianism will never be viable (…unless and until the prohibitionists and central bankers intend to blame it for the problems they’ve caused as their “golden parachutes” deploy, and they’re looking for a scapegoat).
Bon chance,