Plunderbund: Kasich Dodges Another Bullet In Judge’s Order to Dismiss Charlie Earl’s Case

LP Ohio

March 1, 2016
by John Michael Spinelli

More than any other news group, Plunderbund has covered the legal case against Camp Kasich, filed by the Libertarian Party of Ohio [LPO] who saw its candidate for governor two years ago tossed off the primary ballot through a scheme that involved long-time political operatives spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to find a protester who could challenge signatures on party petitions.

For all practical purposes, that fight is now over in light of an order released Monday by Franklin County Common Pleas Court Administrative Judge Patrick Sheeran, who dismissed an appeal by lawyers representing the LPO to a ruling by the Ohio Elections Commission to not pursue the complaint.

Asked to comment on today’s decision, LPO attorney Mark Brown declined to do so. Brown would say no more than the order can be appealed to the 10th District Court of Appeals. Brown has long argued that evidence shows that the Kasich Campaign, the Ohio Republican Party and its Chairman Matt Borges, along with a long-time friend and political operative Terry Casey and officials in Secretary of State Jon Husted’s office were all involved in a scheme to remove Earl from the primary ballot in 2014.

“The Court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of this appeal,” court documents read. “Appellant has no right to appeal the Ohio Elections Commission’s June 30, 2015 Order dismissing Appellant’s complaint for lack of probable cause. The ‘Ohio Elections Commission’s Motion to Dismiss,’ filed on August 25, 2015, is therefore GRANTED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.”

In the judge’s order today, he laid out the heart of the case: “On April 15, 2015, Appellant filed a complaint with the Ohio Elections Commission, naming as respondents Governor Kasich, Lieutenant Governor Taylor, Kasich/Taylor for Ohio (Kasich/Taylor Campaign), Terry Casey, Matt Carle, Jeff Polesovsky, and Dave Luketic (collectively Respondents). Appellant alleged that Respondents had acted in concert to have Appellant removed from the primary ballot in May 2014 and that, in the course of such conduct, Respondents had violated Ohio election law. Specifically, Appellant alleged that Mr. Casey had made an in-kind contribution to the Kasich/Taylor Campaign that was not properly reported, by arranging for third parties to pay the attorney fees incurred in connection with Mr. Felsoci’s protest of Appellant’s candidacy.”

Finish the article here

2 thoughts on “Plunderbund: Kasich Dodges Another Bullet In Judge’s Order to Dismiss Charlie Earl’s Case

  1. Richard Winger

    I hope IPR revises the headline to make it clear that this is not about the Libertarian Party’s ballot access case. Instead it is about Charlie Earl’s lawsuit arguing that the Ohio campaign finance body should have enforced the campaign finance laws against John Kasich’s campaign. Kasich’s campaign spent $592,000 on legal bills to keep Charlie Earl off the 2014 ballot, and didn’t report it in campaign finance reports.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.