Press "Enter" to skip to content

Bob Eoff: There is Only ONE Pro-Life Political Party in Texas

Constitution Party supporters and friends:

In the midst of preparing for the upcoming 2014 elections I want to remind all members and friends we are the only 100% pro-life party, without apology, without compromise and without exception. I believe God will honor our efforts in this regard.

Our party platform lists the Sanctity of Life at the very top — out of alphabetical order for a reason – because of its importance.

January 22, 1973 is a day that will live in infamy. Now, some 41 years from that fateful decision over 50 million innocent babies have not experienced Life God intended.

In view of the Roe anniversary this week, I thought it would be fitting and proper to post a reminder of the most important plank in our platform. Life. Without Life, there is no Liberty.

As some of you may know, Norma McCorvey became pro-life in 1995 after one of our longtime party supporters, Flip Benham, led Norma to the Lord. Norma wrote a book about her conversion Won by Love. An excellent book.

The 5 minute video below will undoubtedly inspire all those who are pro-life and perhaps change minds of others.

Rusty Thomas, a tireless pro-life leader from Waco and one of our longtime supporters, will once again, be one of our speakers at our April 12 State Convention in Haltom City. Rusty Thomas’ website.

For restoration of the republic and the cause of Life.

Bob Eoff, Texas Chairman

Source

14 Comments

  1. paulie January 24, 2014

    I have an even more expansive definition of life that includes the not yet conceived.

  2. RedPhillips January 24, 2014

    “This man clearly cannot grasp the degree of suffering that this narrow interpretation of “life” inflicts on the innocent.”

    Dave Terry, whatever you may think about the issue, pro-lifers do not have a “narrow” interpretation of life. They have an expansive view of life that includes the unborn. That’s what you have a problem with.

  3. paulie January 23, 2014

    The others not so much.

  4. paulie January 23, 2014

    1787 party may actually be able to pull it off, if I am correct that they are the new incarnation of Americans Elect with their big money.

  5. Jed Ziggler Post author | January 23, 2014

    Paulie is correct, the only ballot-qualified parties in Texas currently are the Democratic Party, Republican Party, Libertarian Party, and Green Party. However, there are other parties organized in Texas that may attempt to gain ballot access, and may do activism work, field write-in candidates, run candidates as independents, and/or endorse candidates of other parties. Politics1 lists state affiliates of the Communist Party, Constitution Party, Reform Party, and Socialist Party, and I already posted a story about the 1787 Party petitioning for party status this year.

  6. Jed Ziggler Post author | January 23, 2014

    “Is there a IAP, as in Nevada? Or, is the IAP too liberal for the Texas CP?”

    The IAP in Nevada is in no way connected to the national IAP, the Nevada IAP is an affiliate of the CP. The CP in Oregon is affiliated with the IAP. It’s confusing, but the Nevada IAP and the national IAP are two very different entities.

  7. paulie January 23, 2014

    The only parties well organized enough to clear the state regime’s massive hurdles right now are the duopoly, LP and Greens. Everyone else is not a party according to that state, and none of the rest are close enough to make a serious stab at becoming one.

  8. johnO January 23, 2014

    Is there a IAP, as in Nevada? Or, is the IAP too liberal for the Texas CP?

  9. paulie January 23, 2014

    I believe the CP is against drone use in undeclared wars. I think that’s one area almost all non-duopoly parties agree on. If I’m wrong feel free to correct me.

    I think you are correct. Hoefling’s party may be an exception, though.

  10. paulie January 23, 2014

    There are probably a whole bunch of organizations that are rabidly anti-abortion which are, just like the CP, not recognized as parties in Texas and lack the resources to become recognized as parties in Texas.

  11. Jed Ziggler Post author | January 23, 2014

    I believe the CP is against drone use in undeclared wars. I think that’s one area almost all non-duopoly parties agree on. If I’m wrong feel free to correct me.

  12. Jill Pyeatt January 23, 2014

    I hope that, by calling themselves pro-life, they really mean pro-life, even for brown people who live in other countries. And yes, I’m talking about those coward machines (drones).

  13. Dave Terry January 23, 2014

    Isn’t it interesting to note that the TEXAS C.P. is the ONLY party courageous enough to elect an Oaf as Chairman.

    This man clearly cannot grasp the degree of suffering that this narrow interpretation of “life” inflicts on the innocent.

  14. Spence January 23, 2014

    These wackos are delusional and are not recognized as a party by the state, which is just as well….they should just keep their religion in their own snake handling churches and stop trying to use the state to impose them on everyone else.

Comments are closed.