Press "Enter" to skip to content

Johnson-Weld is Not a Perfect Ticket, But I’m Still Supporting the Libertarian Party


The Libertarian Party Has Nominated Johnson-Weld — What Next?

By Avens O’Brien
June 1, 2016

On Sunday, the Libertarian Party selected its ticket. Governor Gary Johnson as their presidential nominee, and Governor William Weld as their vice presidential nominee. I was there, and yes, I was on a different “team.” I watched both win on the second ballot, but not by large margins. Johnson only won 55% of the 928 votes, and Weld only 50.5%. Weld won because Johnson pretty much begged us to nominate him. This was not a mandate. This was what appeared to be a begrudging majority. I didn’t vote for either candidate and I’m not going to pretend I’m thrilled with the results.

The fact is, the Libertarian Party is experiencing some growing pains. This convention was the most attended in the party’s history. The world is actually looking at us, since the major parties have opted to choose some of the universally least likable candidates as their nominees. People are flocking in from the left and the right, and the LP is deciding what it wants to be when it grows up.

Choosing someone like John McAfee, as I preferred, would have been a statement on the sheer nonsense of the political process — how our politicians don’t represent us, how the system is rigged against the American people, and how wanting to be like the rest of the political class does dilute the principled message we believe at our core. Choosing someone like Gary Johnson says we’re trying to play the game, and we have faith that the system is eating itself up enough that we have a chance, if we just put up a moderate, non-extreme, non-offensive, safe option for Americans who cannot handle their other two choices.

Which one could work? I don’t actually know. Some of us are jaded enough to believe the system is too rigged and too corrupt to allow us near the presidency, and others think we just need to play their game. I’d say the people deluding themselves are those who think they know for certain which side is right.

However, the Johnson-Weld ticket presents an interesting opportunity. Johnson does have appeal to the left and the right. They aren’t “scary” to the mainstream world. They have executive experience, moderately libertarian views, and they’re trying to prove they can succeed by playing by the rules. Regardless of statements about being a “separate” campaign from the party, and regardless of the criticism that this ticket is just a Republican takeover, the fact is that Johnson is absolutely *more* libertarian than the other two options that will be on the ballot in November. I will vote for him because I want to see my Party succeed by those terms, if it’s possible.

Maybe it’s not possible; maybe everything is broken, but this is great year to find out. We have a perfect opportunity, and if Johnson-Weld can’t perform, maybe we’ll all learn for sure that we can’t win by playing by their rules. Maybe this is the way to convince the delusional that we did everything we could and we still lost or we barely made a dent — maybe this isn’t our game. Or maybe we win. I’m okay with being wrong if it means having Johnson in the White House over the other options on the ballot.

I once had a job that had what I considered to be a stupid process for selling their product. I asked to change the process and my boss asked me to try it their way first and see if I could find success. If my numbers still weren’t performing, he’d be open to trying a different way, but he refused to allow me to deviate from company policy until I’d tried and failed their way. So I did it. I did a month by their rules, and then tried a month by my own, and I presented the results of my A/B test. My boss allowed me to do things my way. I think of that story when I think of this election.

The delegates have spoken and we have our nominees. I’ll try playing by the rules and see where it leads us. I understand if other Libertarians can’t bring themselves to support this ticket, but I wish they’d reconsider. I know straight partisanship is not appealing within the libertarian movement, but I think of my former boss and I think: okay, let’s try your way, and when it doesn’t work and we tried our best, we can honestly say “I told you so” without having been a cause for the failure.

Read more: The Libertarian Republic
Follow us: @TheLibRepublic on Twitter

Bio from the Libertarian Republic:

Avens O’Brien is a second-generation libertarian residing in Los Angeles, where she works in digital media advertising, handling Operations & BizDev at Thoughtful Media Group. Prior, she worked for Peter Schiff at Euro Pacific Capital. She’s been active in anti-war protests since 2003, & volunteered on Badnarik’s LP campaign in 2004 as well as Ron Paul’s primary campaign in 2008. She was Vice Chair of the LPNH from 2006-2008. She thinks civil & economic liberty are equally essential to the human spirit. Her goal is through her experience in advertising to assist the libertarian movement in messaging & increasing awareness. She’s a Facebook agitator turned writer, dissident feminist, contributor to Thoughts on Liberty as well as TLR, & articulates life experiences & their inspired philosophical thoughts on her personal blog: Taste it Twice. You can meet her at Freedom Fest in Las Vegas every year, or at Burning Man if you’re that wild.

About Post Author

Jill Pyeatt

Jill Pyeatt is a small-business owner and jewelry designer from Southern California. She currently serves on the Judicial Committee of the Libertarian Party of CA. She can be found on Facebook and Twitter.


  1. Andy Andy June 1, 2016

    I met Avens at the convention. She seemed cool.

  2. Bondurant Bondurant June 1, 2016

    Weld, like Barr, makes the LP the lesser of three evils option. That’s not good enough to earn my vote.

  3. Jon Jon June 2, 2016

    There seem to be so many in the Libertarian Party that refuse to grow up and recognize if the party is ever going to become a serious alternative to the R’s and D’s it has to nominate candidates like Gary Johnson and Bill Weld. So many of the alternatives who are named could easily be confused with the average insane asylum inmate. Does Ms. O’Brien seriously think somebody like McAfee would get even a half percent of the popular vote in a general election? The same goes with the others and history has borne this out. Gary Johnson is polling at least 10% now and I’ve seen one poll after the convention that has him even higher. The Libertarian Party needs to decide whether it wants to continue running fringe candidates that nobody votes for or even listens to or whether it’s time to mature and see where the get by running serious candidates. There is a reason the party has only 400K registered members. In order to win a general election you’re going to have to draw heavily from the independents and D’s and R’s and somebody like Gary Johnson can do that.

  4. Bondurant Bondurant June 2, 2016

    @ Jon

    Diluting the message for electoral gain is not a genuine winning strategy. It’s called the Libertarian Party and not the GOP Lite Party for a reason.

    The hypocrisy of running a ticket with a gun grabbing, Patriot Act supporting fan of eminent domain as our veep is not difficult to see by actual libertarians.

    It makes perfect sense to GOP interlopers. GOP hacks destroyed your party and allowed someone like Trump to happen with your bullshit ideas & wanton corruption. Leave that crap out of our party.

  5. Brad Brad June 2, 2016

    One of the definitions of “Perfectionism” is this:

    “a personal standard, attitude, or philosophy that demands perfection and rejects anything less.”

    This seems to be the drive behind the disgruntlement of libertarian-minded people to the LP’s nominees for PUSA. They want pure adherence to their version of libertarian philosophy. That makes the LP a social club not too unlike the Freemasons or Odd Fellows. That is not a true political party.

  6. Wes Wagner Wes Wagner June 2, 2016

    There seems to be some drive behind the disgruntlement in the republican-minded people for the GOPs nominee for POTUS. They want some sort of pure adherance to conservative standards and platform and their version of republican philosophy. That makes the republican party a social club, not unlike the Gypsy Jokers or Hell’s Angels. That is really not a true political party.

  7. Phil Gray Phil Gray June 2, 2016

    There may be a path to the White House. If Johnson Weld wins a very few targeted states, and deny the others 270, the newly seated House votes by state. If there are 26 deadlocked states by representative count, they may choose Johnson. The road runs through Ohio, and the single district Western states

  8. langa langa June 2, 2016

    One of the definitions of “straw man” is this:

    “a weak or imaginary argument or opponent that is set up to be easily defeated”

    I have yet to see a perfect candidate, in the LP or anywhere else. Yet I have seen many candidates that were good enough for me to support, including Harry Browne, Ron Paul, and basically every other LP candidate. Heck, even though I bitterly opposed their nomination, I reluctantly supported Barr/Root. Furthermore, even though they were far from my “perfect” ticket, I still somewhat cheerfully supported Johnson/Gray. But at some point, you have to say enough is enough. And in this year, which has been characterized by such widespread public disenchantment with the status quo and the Establishment types, running a couple of Establishment insiders on a milquetoast platform, is simply beyond the pale.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.